Antibiotic prophylaxis in children undergoing abdominal surgery for neoplastic diseases.

Little is known about the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) in paediatric abdominopelvic surgical oncology. A retrospective analysis was performed upon the incidence of SSIs in children receiving a 24-hour antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin for abdominopelvic oncological surgery. In all, 145 patients (57% females) with a median age of 4 years underwent surgical procedures for abdominopelvic tumours. No SSIs were detected, despite the various risk factors known to be associated with their occurrence (such as pre- and post- surgical chemotherapy, long hospitalization, intensive care unit admission and drain placement). Cefazolin prophylaxis seems to be safe and effective in preventing SSIs in children undergoing abdominopelvic surgery for oncological diseases.

Complications of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children: A Prospective Morbidity and Mortality Analysis Using the Clavien-Dindo Classification.

There is a lack of information about evaluation of pediatric minimal access surgery complications; the Clavien-Dindo classification was never used for a large series of laparoscopic and thoracoscopic pediatric procedures. With a prospective Morbidity and Mortality database, all the minimal access surgical procedures carried out between 2012 and 2016 were included in this study. Statistical analyses were used to valuate modification of surgical techniques in to 2 periods (period 1: January 2012 to February 2014; period 2: February 2014 to February 2016). A total of 1374 minimal access procedures were performed on 1371 patients. The overall complication rate was 2.9%. No differences, in terms of complications, were observed between elective and emergency procedures (P=0.3). There was a significant difference between the complication rate of thoracoscopic surgery (P=0.027). These results provide the relevance of adequate recording system and standardized classification for analyses and reduction of complications for pediatric minimal access procedures.

Da Vinci Robotic Surgery in a Pediatric Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Since the use of robotic surgery (RS) revolutionized some adult surgery procedures such as radical prostatectomy, it has been progressively and increasingly introduced in pediatric surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate how the Da Vinci® Si HD technology impacts a pediatric public hospital and to define the use of a robotic system in pediatric surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively included patients older than 6 months of age undergoing RS or conventional minimal access surgery (MAS): Study period ranges between February 2015 and April 2016. Surgical indications were defined after a detailed disease-specific diagnostic work-up. We analyzed surgical outcomes and the most relevant economic aspects. The 30-day postoperative complications were evaluated and retrospectively collected in an electronic database. RESULTS: From February 2015 to April 2016, we performed 77 procedures with RS and 84 with conventional MAS in patients with a median age of 77 and 98 months at surgery and a median weight of 20 and 23 kg, respectively. Median operative times were 130 and 109 minutes, respectively. We observed 9.1% of complications in the RS group and 6% in the MAS group and the difference was not statistically significant. Of note, 8 out of 77 RS procedures would have been performed with open classic surgery in case of conversion or failure of RS. CONCLUSIONS: This initial experience confirms that RS is as safe and effective as conventional MAS. A number of selected procedures performed with RS would only benefit from this approach, as it is not suitable for conventional MAS. Although economically demanding, in particular for a pediatric hospital, we firmly believe that centralization of care would allow pediatric surgeons adopting RS to perform complex reconstructive surgical procedures with great advantages for the patients and a minimal increase in overall costs for the health system.

Use of failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis to compare the vulnerabilities of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

PURPOSE: To measure the feasibility of using FMECA applied to the surgery and then compare the vulnerabilities of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy by using FMECA. METHODS: The FMECA study was performed on each single selected phase of appendectomy and on complication-related data during the period January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2010. The risk analysis phase was completed by evaluation of the criticality index (CI) of each appendectomy-related failure mode (FM). The CI is calculated by multiplying the estimated frequency of occurrence (O) of the FM, by the expected severity of the injury to the patient (S), and the detectability (D) of the FM. RESULTS: In the first year of analysis (2009), 177 appendectomies were performed, 110 open and 67 laparoscopic. Eleven adverse events were related to the open appendectomy: 1 bleeding (CI: 8) and 10 postoperative infections (CI: 32). Three adverse events related to the laparoscopic approach were recorded: 1 postoperative infection (CI: 8) and 2 incorrect extractions of the appendix through the umbilical port (CI: 6). In the second year of analysis (2010), 158 appendectomies were performed, 69 open and 89 laparoscopic. Four adverse events were related to the open appendectomy: 1 incorrect management of the histological specimen (CI: 2), 1 dehiscence of the surgical wound (CI: 6), and 2 infections (CI: 6). No adverse events were recorded in laparoscopic approach. CONCLUSION: FMECA helped the staff compare the 2 approaches through an accurate step-by-step analysis, highlighting that laparoscopic appendectomy is feasible and safe, associated with a lower incidence of infection and other complications, reduced length of hospital stay, and an apparent lower procedure-related risk.

Near-miss events are really missed! Reflections on incident reporting in a department of pediatric surgery.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of surgical and organizational events that occurred in the whole Department of Paediatric Surgery at Gaslini Children's Hospital through an incident-reporting system in order to identify the vulnerabilities of this system and improve it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a 6-month prospective observational study (1st January-1st July 2010) of all events (including surgical and organizational events, and near misses) that occurred in our department of surgery (pediatric surgery, orthopedics and neurosurgery units). RESULTS: Over a 6-month study period, 3,635 children were admitted: 1,904 out of 3,635 (52.4%) children underwent a surgical procedure. A total number of 111 adverse events and 4 near misses were recorded in 100 patients. A total of 108 (97.3%) adverse events occurred following a surgical procedure. Of 111 adverse events, 34 (30.6%) required re-intervention. Eighteen of 100 patients (18%) required a re-admission, and 18 of 111 adverse events (16.2%) were classified as organizational. Infection represented the most common event. CONCLUSIONS: An electronic physician-reported event tracking system should be incorporated into all surgery departments to report more accurately adverse events and near misses. In this system, all definitions must be standardized and near misses should be considered as important as the other events, being a rich source of learning.

Risk management in pediatric surgery.

PURPOSE: To present the experience documented over 1 year of analysis and quality control on surgical complications and organizational accidents. METHODS: All children admitted during the study period at our Institution were included in the analysis, which consisted of four phases: (1) definition and standardization of perioperative diagnostic and therapeutic tracks; (2) staff education; (3) documentation and data implementation, and (4) "Morbidity and Mortality" audit. RESULTS: Over a 1-year study period, 3,116 children were admitted to our Institution: 2,222 out of 3,116 (71.3%) children underwent a surgical procedure. A total number of 184 complications were recorded in 149 patients. One hundred and seventy-one (92.9%) complications occurred following a surgical procedure. Fifty-six out of 149 complicated patients (37.6%) required a re-operation. Thirty-five out of 184 (19%) complications were classified as organizational. Infection represented the most common complication. All cases of anastomotic dehiscence and perforation, bowel obstruction, and stoma malfunction required reintervention. None of the postoperative bleedings required a second surgical procedure. CONCLUSION: Although a proper statistical comparison with literature complication rates is not feasible, our experience confirms the importance of quality-control audit in health care systems. Prolonged observation, long-term follow up, and comparison with previous results will represent our future goal.