Literary evidence of the impact of nonbiological risk factors on CRMS/CFSPID: A scoping review.

Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) occasionally results in an inconclusive diagnosis of this disease, and these individuals are designated as CFTR-related metabolic syndrome (CRMS) in the United States, and CF Screen Positive Inconclusive Diagnosis (CFSPID) in other countries. Some of these asymptomatic individuals will progress to symptomatic disease, but risk factors associated with disease progression are not well understood. This scoping review was conducted to comprehensively map nonbiological risk factors in the CRMS/CFSPID literature and to identify understudied topics. Six electronic databases were systematically searched, resulting in 2951 studies. Forty nine eligible works were identified as including information on nonbiological risk factors related to CRMS/CFPSID. Eligible studies were published from 2002 to 2024, most prevalently in the United States (36.7%), and as quantitative data (81.6%). Of the 49 eligible works, 23 articles contributed only intellectual conjecture, while 26 articles contained original data, which underwent full-text qualitative content analysis. Key themes identified in descending order of content coverage included Psychological Impact, Management Care, Newborn Screening and Diagnostics, Communicating Diagnosis, and Lifestyle and External Exposures. This scoping review identified that while nonbiological risk factors are being studied in the CRMS/CFSPID literature, there was nearly equal distribution of works gathering original data to those citing previously published information. These findings indicate a critical need for original data collection on these risk factors, particularly on understudied topics identified herein.

Differential distribution of ivacaftor and its metabolites in plasma and human airway epithelia.

Ivacaftor is the first clinically approved monotherapy potentiator to treat CFTR channel dysfunction in people with cystic fibrosis. Ivacaftor (Iva) is a critical component for all current modulator therapies, including highly effective modulator therapies. Clinical studies show that CF patients on ivacaftor-containing therapies present various clinical responses, off-target effects, and adverse reactions, which could be related to metabolites of the compound. In this study, we reported the concentrations of Iva and two of its major metabolites (M1-Iva and M6-Iva) in capillary plasma and estimated M1-Iva and M6-Iva metabolic activity via the metabolite parent ratio in capillary plasma over 12 h. We also used the ratio of capillary plasma versus human nasal epithelial cell concentrations to evaluate entry into epithelial cells in vivo. M6-Iva was rarely detected by LC-MS/MS in epithelial cells from participants taking ivacaftor, although it was detected in plasma. To further explore this discrepancy, we performed in vitro studies, which showed that M1-Iva, but not M6-Iva, readily crossed 16HBE cell membranes. Our studies also suggest that metabolism of these compounds is unlikely to occur in airway epithelia despite evidence of expression of metabolism enzymes. Overall, our data provide evidence that there are differences between capillary and cellular concentrations of these compounds that may inform future studies of clinical response and off-target effects.

Pharmacokinetic variability of CFTR modulators from standard and alternative regimens.

Elexacaftor, tezacaftor, ivacaftor (ETI) is a CFTR modulator combination approved for use in ∼90 % of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) over 2 years old. While most pwCF tolerate this therapy well, some are intolerant to standard dosing, and others show little response. Clinical providers may adjust ETI dosing to combat these issues, but these adjustments are not well guided by pharmacokinetic evidence. Our post-approval study aimed to describe pharmacokinetic variability of ETI plasma concentrations in 15 participants who were administered a standard or reduced dose. ETI were quantified by LC-MS/MS in plasma samples taken prior to the morning dose. Results showed non-significant differences for each compound regardless of dosing regimen and after dose equivalence normalization. The majority of participants in both dosing groups had concentrations expected to elicit clinical response to ETI therapy. These findings indicate that dose reduction may be a viable strategy to maintain clinical benefit while managing intolerance.