ABSTRACT
Diabetes mellitus and its complications are a known public health problem nowadays. Diabetic nephropathy is one of the main complications and the result of multiple mechanisms, including: activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, formation of advanced glycation end products and chronic inflammation that led to glomerular and tubulo-interstitial damage producing mesangial expansion and glomerulosclerosis, which finally results in chronic kidney disease. Early detection of diabetic nephropathy is essential for adequate intervention to stop, or at least slow down its progression. Multiple markers have been described, not only the classic ones such as serum creatinine, urea, and albuminuria, but at this point also novel biomarkers such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, tumor necrosis factor 1 receptor and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, among others. The aim of this article was to provide an update review of the role of biomarkers in the diagnosis of diabetic nephropathy.
ABSTRACT
Background: A sedentary lifestyle and an unhealthy diet have considerably increased the incidence of diabetes mellitus worldwide in recent decades, which has generated a high rate of associated chronic complications. Methods: A narrative review was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASES and SciELO databases, including 162 articles. Results: Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is the most common of these complications, mainly producing two types of involvement: sensorimotor neuropathy, whose most common form is symmetric distal polyneuropathy, and autonomic neuropathies, affecting the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and urogenital system. Although hyperglycemia is the main metabolic alteration involved in its genesis, the presents of obesity, dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, and smoking, play an additional role in its appearance. In the pathophysiology, three main phenomena stand out: oxidative stress, the formation of advanced glycosylation end-products, and microvasculature damage. Diagnosis is clinical, and it is recommended to use a 10 g monofilament and a 128 Hz tuning fork as screening tools. Glycemic control and non-pharmacological interventions constitute the mainstay of DN treatment, although there are currently investigations in antioxidant therapies, in addition to pain management. Conclusions: Diabetes mellitus causes damage to peripheral nerves, being the most common form of this, distal symmetric polyneuropathy. Control of glycemia and comorbidities contribute to prevent, postpone, and reduce its severity. Pharmacological interventions are intended to relieve pain.
ABSTRACT
Lipschütz ulcer is a non-sexually transmitted genital lesion of unknown etiology, which presents as a painful vulvar ulcer. Lipschütz ulcers have been described in most continents. This is the first case reported in Peru and South America. We present the case of a 33-year-old female patient with a Lipschütz ulcer after being vaccinated with the second dose of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. She reported having had only one sexual partner in her lifetime. Laboratory results were negative for herpes simplex 2, Cytomegalovirus, Toxoplasma gondii, Epstein-Barr virus, and syphilis. The patient received symptomatic treatment. Ten days after the onset, the patient was significantly better during follow-up. This case report displays a potential adverse effect of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine as a Lipschütz ulcer triggered by the host humoral immune response. However, further research is needed to establish the causal relationship between these two.
La úlcera de Lipschütz es una lesión genital no transmitidas por vía sexual de etiología desconocida, se presenta como una úlcera vulvar muy dolorosa. Las úlceras de Lipschütz se han descrito en la mayoría de los continentes. Este es el primer caso que se reporta en Perú y Sudamérica. En este reporte de caso se presentauna paciente de 33 años con una úlcera de Lipschütz luego de haber sido vacunada con la segunda dosis de la vacuna AstraZeneca COVID-19. Refirió haber tenido una sola pareja sexual a lo largo de su vida. Los resultados de laboratorio fueron negativos para herpes simplex 2, Citomegalovirus, Toxoplasma gondii, virus de Epstein-Barr y sífilis. La paciente recibió tratamiento sintomático. Diez días después, durante el seguimiento, la paciente estaba significativamente mejor. Este reporte de caso expone un potencial efecto adverso de la vacuna AstraZeneca COVID-19, en forma de úlcera de Lipschütz, desencadenado por la respuesta inmune humoral del huésped. Sin embargo, es necesario realizar más investigación para establecer la relación causal entre ambos.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Vulvar Diseases , Adult , Female , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , South America , Ulcer/etiology , Ulcer/drug therapy , Vaccination , Vulvar Diseases/etiology , Vulvar Diseases/drug therapy , Vulvar Diseases/pathologyABSTRACT
Lipschütz ulcer is a non-sexually transmitted genital lesion of unknown etiology, which presents as a painful vulvar ulcer. Lipschütz ulcers have been described in most continents. This is the first case reported in Peru and South America. We present the case of a 33-year-old female patient with a Lipschütz ulcer after being vaccinated with the second dose of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine. She reported having had only one sexual partner in her lifetime. Laboratory results were negative for herpes simplex 2, Cytomegalovirus, Toxoplasma gondii, Epstein-Barr virus, and syphilis. The patient received symptomatic treatment. Ten days after the onset, the patient was significantly better during follow-up. This case report displays a potential adverse effect of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine as a Lipschütz ulcer triggered by the host humoral immune response. However, further research is needed to establish the causal relationship between these two.
La úlcera de Lipschütz es una lesión genital no transmitidas por vía sexual de etiología desconocida, se presenta como una úlcera vulvar muy dolorosa. Las úlceras de Lipschütz se han descrito en la mayoría de los continentes. Este es el primer caso que se reporta en Perú y Sudamérica. En este reporte de caso se presentauna paciente de 33 años con una úlcera de Lipschütz luego de haber sido vacunada con la segunda dosis de la vacuna AstraZeneca COVID-19. Refirió haber tenido una sola pareja sexual a lo largo de su vida. Los resultados de laboratorio fueron negativos para herpes simplex 2, Citomegalovirus, Toxoplasma gondii, virus de Epstein-Barr y sífilis. La paciente recibió tratamiento sintomático. Diez días después, durante el seguimiento, la paciente estaba significativamente mejor. Este reporte de caso expone un potencial efecto adverso de la vacuna AstraZeneca COVID-19, en forma de úlcera de Lipschütz, desencadenado por la respuesta inmune humoral del huésped. Sin embargo, es necesario realizar más investigación para establecer la relación causal entre ambos.
ABSTRACT
Abdominal pregnancy is defined as one that occurs outside of the uterus and fallopian tubes in the abdominal cavity. We present the case of a 30-year-old Peruvian female patient from Lima with a surgical history of exploratory laparotomy due to tubal ectopic pregnancy and appendectomy without further relevant personal or family histories. She attended the emergency room of a social security hospital in Peru with a referral from a district hospital and a diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy at 14 weeks of gestational age without previous prenatal controls. Symptomatology at hospital admission was colic-type abdominal pain in the hypogastrium without vaginal bleeding, fluid loss or fever. During hospitalization, she underwent an exploratory laparotomy with embolization of the uterine artery, left salpingectomy, and removal of the abdominal ectopic pregnancy. The evolution was favorable after the surgery, and she was discharged. Without further complications, she continues her controls at the obstetrics and gynecology outpatient service without complications.
El embarazo abdominal es aquel embarazo que ocurre fuera del útero y las trompas de Falopio en la cavidad abdominal. Presentamos el caso de una paciente peruana de 30 años proveniente de la ciudad de Lima, con antecedentes quirúrgicos de laparotomía exploradora por embarazo ectópico tubárico y apendicectomía, sin otras patologías ni antecedentes familiares de importancia. La paciente acude al servicio de urgencias de un hospital del seguro social en Perú derivada de un hospital distrital con diagnóstico de embarazo abdominal a las 14 semanas de edad gestacional, sin controles prenatales previos. La sintomatología al ingreso hospitalario fue dolor abdominal de tipo cólico a nivel del hipogastrio, sin sangrado vaginal, pérdida de líquidos o fiebre. Durante su hospitalización se le realizó una laparotomía exploratoria con embolización de la arteria uterina, salpingectomía izquierda y extracción del embarazo abdominal. La evolución fue favorable tras la intervención quirúrgica, siendo dada de alta. Actualmente continúa sus controles en el servicio de consulta externa del servicio de ginecología y obstetricia sin complicaciones.
ABSTRACT
Abdominal pregnancy is defined as one that occurs outside of the uterus and fallopian tubes in the abdominal cavity. We present the case of a 30-year-old Peruvian female patient from Lima with a surgical history of exploratory laparotomy due to tubal ectopic pregnancy and appendectomy without further relevant personal or family histories. She attended the emergency room of a social security hospital in Peru with a referral from a district hospital and a diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy at 14 weeks of gestational age without previous prenatal controls. Symptomatology at hospital admission was colic-type abdominal pain in the hypogastrium without vaginal bleeding, fluid loss or fever. During hospitalization, she underwent an exploratory laparotomy with embolization of the uterine artery, left salpingectomy, and removal of the abdominal ectopic pregnancy. The evolution was favorable after the surgery, and she was discharged. Without further complications, she continues her controls at the obstetrics and gynecology outpatient service without complications.
El embarazo abdominal es aquel embarazo que ocurre fuera del útero y las trompas de Falopio en la cavidad abdominal. Presentamos el caso de una paciente peruana de 30 años proveniente de la ciudad de Lima, con antecedentes quirúrgicos de laparotomía exploradora por embarazo ectópico tubárico y apendicectomía, sin otras patologías ni antecedentes familiares de importancia. La paciente acude al servicio de urgencias de un hospital del seguro social en Perú derivada de un hospital distrital con diagnóstico de embarazo abdominal a las 14 semanas de edad gestacional, sin controles prenatales previos. La sintomatología al ingreso hospitalario fue dolor abdominal de tipo cólico a nivel del hipogastrio, sin sangrado vaginal, pérdida de líquidos o fiebre. Durante su hospitalización se le realizó una laparotomía exploratoria con embolización de la arteria uterina, salpingectomía izquierda y extracción del embarazo abdominal. La evolución fue favorable tras la intervención quirúrgica, siendo dada de alta. Actualmente continúa sus controles en el servicio de consulta externa del servicio de ginecología y obstetricia sin complicaciones.
Subject(s)
Pregnancy, Abdominal , Pregnancy, Tubal , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Adult , Pregnancy, Abdominal/diagnosis , Pregnancy, Abdominal/surgery , Pregnancy, Tubal/diagnosis , Pregnancy, Tubal/surgery , Uterus , Salpingectomy/adverse effects , Abdominal Pain/etiologyABSTRACT
Background: Primary aldosteronism is a disorder due to excessive aldosterone production in the presence of low renin levels. It is an underdiagnosed pathology despite its simple screening. Establishing the unilateral or bilateral location represents the greatest diagnostic challenge and is crucial to define the therapeutic approach. Adrenal venous catheterization (AVC) is the best test to establish the location, but it is invasive and expensive. New predictive markers of laterality are being developed. Case series presentation: We present a case series of 8 patients diagnosed with primary aldosteronism due to arterial hypertension with hypokalaemia, elevated aldosterone-renin ratio and compatible computed tomography. 4 patients underwent adrenal venous catheterization. Conclusion: In patients who underwent catheterization as well as in those who did not, the Küpers score adequately predicted lateralization in 75% of cases and it could be a useful tool to discriminate unilateral from bilateral aldosteronism.
Introducción: El hiperaldosteronismo primario es un desorden debido a una producción excesiva de aldosterona en presencia de niveles bajos de renina. Es una patología infradiagnosticada a pesar de su simple tamizaje. Definir la localización unilateral o bilateral representa el más importante desafío diagnóstico y es crucial para el abordaje terapéutico. El cateterismo venoso adrenal (CVA) es la mejor prueba para establecer la localización, pero es invasivo y costoso. Nuevos marcadores predictivos de unilateralidad se encuentran en desarrollo. Presentación de serie de casos: Presentamos una serie de casos de 8 pacientes diagnosticados con hiperaldosteronismo primario debido a hipertensión arterial con hipocalemia, radio aldosterona-renina elevado y tomografía compatible. 4 pacientes fueron sometidos a cateterismo venoso adrenal. Conclusión: Tanto en los pacientes que fueron sometidos a cateterismo venoso adrenal como en los que no, el score de Küpers predijo adecuadamente la lateralidad en 75% de los casos y puede ser una herramienta útil para diferenciar el hiperaldosteronismo unilateral del bilateral.
ABSTRACT
This review provides an update on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the small bowel (SB). These NENs are defined as a group of neoplasms deriving from neuroendocrine cells. NENs are currently the most common primary tumors of the SB, mainly involving the ileum, making the SB the most frequently affected part of the gastrointestinal tract. SB NENs by definition are located between the ligament of Treitz and the ileocecal valve. They are characterized by small size and induce an extensive fibrotic reaction in the small intestine including the mesentery, resulting in narrowing or twisting of the intestine. Clinical manifestations of bowel functionality are related to the precise location of the primary tumor. The majority of them are non-functional NENs and generally asymptomatic; in an advanced stage, NENs present symptoms of mass effect by non-specific abdominal pain or carcinoid syndrome which appears in patients with liver metastasis (around 10%). The main manifestations of the carcinoid syndrome are facial flushing (94%), diarrhea (78%), abdominal cramps (50%), heart valve disease (50%), telangiectasia (25%), wheezing (15%) and edema (19%). Diagnosis is made by imaging or biochemical tests, and the order of request will depend on the initial diagnostic hypothesis, while confirmation will always be histological. All patients with a localized SB NEN with or without near metastasis in the mesentery are recommended for curative resection. Locoregional and distant spread may be susceptible to several therapeutic strategies, such as chemotherapy, somatostatin analogs and palliative resection.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The prevalence and incidence of infertility are increasing worldwide; they are associated with a significant economic and social impact. Infertility is defined as the inability to achieve pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sex. In recent times, the male factor has gained importance and currently it contributes to approximately 50% of infertility cases. Multiple etiologies are stated, such as metabolic, anatomical, genetic or even idiopathic causes; however, the main cause is semen abnormalities. The aim of this manuscript is to provide a complete review of hormonal assessment of male infertility, as well as to review the physiology and pathophysiology related to the male gonadal axis. METHODS: This study is a narrative abstract carried out on basis of systematic bibliographic review, using articles indexed in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase and Scielo, which were published during the last 20 years. RESULTS: The cornerstone of the evaluation of the hormonal status is semen analysis. Clinicians must rule out hypogonadism in those patients who present oligospermia and azoospermia, by determining levels of testosterone and gonadotropins, which provide the functionality status of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis. Evaluation of the adrenal, thyroid, and lactotroph axis are indicated in those patients with central hypogonadism. CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in the diagnosis of male infertility, some causes are not fully understood, therefore, it is crucial to perform a timely hormonal evaluation of the male factor in infertile couples, in order to provide adequate treatment and improve fertility rates.
