Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 14: 48, 2014 Apr 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24713131

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many investigators are interested in recruiting veterans from recent conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and/or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Researchers pursuing such studies may experience problems in recruiting sufficient numbers unless effective strategies are used. Currently, there is very little information on recruitment strategies for individuals with TBI and/or PTSD. It is known that groups of patients with medical conditions may be less likely to volunteer for clinical research. This study investigated the feasibility of recruiting veterans returning from recent military conflicts--Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF)--using a population-based sampling method. METHODS: Individuals were sampled from a previous epidemiological study. Three study sites focused on recruiting survey respondents (n = 445) who lived within a 60 mile radius of one of the sites. RESULTS: Overall, the successful recruitment of veterans using a population-based sampling method was dependent on the ability to contact potential participants following mass mailing. Study enrollment of participants with probable TBI and/or PTSD had a recruitment yield (enrolled/total identified) of 5.4%. We were able to contact 146 individuals, representing a contact rate of 33%. Sixty-six of the individuals contacted were screened. The major reasons for not screening included a stated lack of interest in the study (n = 37), a failure to answer screening calls after initial contact (n = 30), and an unwillingness or inability to travel to a study site (n = 10). Based on the phone screening, 36 veterans were eligible for the study. Twenty-four veterans were enrolled, (recruitment yield = 5.4%) and twelve were not enrolled for a variety of reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with a population-based sampling method for recruitment of recent combat veterans illustrates the challenges encountered, particularly contacting and screening potential participants. The screening and enrollment data will help guide recruitment for future studies using population-based methods.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/epidemiology , Patient Selection , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/epidemiology , Adult , Afghan Campaign 2001- , Brain Injuries/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Iraq War, 2003-2011 , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Military Personnel , Population , Postal Service , Sampling Studies , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Veterans
2.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 91(7): 1082-6, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20599047

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether or not a battery of neurobehavioral tests, the Brief Objective Neurobehavioral Detector (BOND), could detect mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) among a group of psychiatric inpatients with numerous substance-related and medical comorbidities. The 16-item BOND is comprised of neurologic examination tasks and has been shown to correlate with radiologic and cognitive findings in previous studies. DESIGN: Masked comparison. SETTING: Inpatient psychiatric unit at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Washington, DC. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=51) sequentially admitted for suicidal ideation in the context of various psychiatric disorders. INTERVENTIONS: No intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: BOND total and subtest scores. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were eligible and analyzed. Twenty-seven had sustained an mTBI in the distant past, and 16 had never sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI) (non-TBI group). On average, the mTBI group demonstrated a significantly greater number of abnormal subtests on the BOND (mean, 7.22) than did the non-TBI group (mean, 4.50; P=.003). Although the BOND significantly correlated with the presence of mTBI, it did not correlate with any of the psychiatric, substance-related, or medical comorbidities. Multiple regressions indicated that the BOND total score was not explained by age, posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis, or any combination of the psychiatric, substance-related, or medical comorbidities. High rates of sensitivity (70%) and specificity (69%) were found. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this pilot study suggest that the inexpensive, brief, and objective BOND instrument may be a useful screening tool for the detection of subtle neurologic brain abnormalities after mTBI, even in the presence of substantial comorbidities.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/complications , Brain Injuries/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/complications , Adult , Aged , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Observer Variation , Regression Analysis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Trauma Severity Indices
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...