Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Clin Oral Investig ; 20(9): 2551-2558, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26993658

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess the correlation between dental plaque scores determined by the measurement of red autofluorescence or by visualization with a two-tone solution. Clinical photographs were used for this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overnight plaque from the anterior teeth of 48 participants was assessed for red fluorescence on photographs (taken with a QLF-camera) using a modified Quigley & Hein (mQH) index. A two-tone disclosing solution was applied. Total disclosed plaque was clinically assessed using the mQH index. In addition, total and blue disclosed plaque was scored on clinical photographs using the mQH index. RESULTS: A strong correlation was observed between the total disclosed plaque scored on photographs and the clinical scores (r = 0.70 at site level; r = 0.88 at subject level). The correlation between red fluorescent plaque and total plaque, as assessed on the photographs, was moderate to strong and significant (r = 0.50 at the site level; r = 0.70 at the subject level), with the total plaque scores consistently higher than the red fluorescent plaque scores. The correlation between red fluorescent plaque and blue disclosed plaque was weak to moderate and significant (r = 0.30 at the site level; r = 0.50 at the subject level). CONCLUSIONS: Plaque, as scored on white-light photographs, corresponds well with clinically assessed plaque. A weak to moderate correlation between red fluorescing plaque and total disclosed plaque or blue disclosed plaque was found. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: What at present is considered to be matured dental plaque, which appears blue following the application of a two-tone disclosing solution, is not in agreement with red fluorescent dental plaque assessment.


Subject(s)
Dental Plaque/diagnosis , Fluorescent Dyes , Photography, Dental/methods , Adult , Color , Colorimetry/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dental Plaque Index , Female , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results
2.
J Int Acad Periodontol ; 13(1): 2-10, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21387981

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of an oral irrigator (OI) with a prototype jet tip or a standard jet tip to floss as adjunct to daily toothbrushing on gingival bleeding. METHODS: In this single masked, 3-group parallel, 4-week home use experiment, 108 subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) 01 with a prototype jet tip; 2) OI with a standard jet tip; 3) waxed dental floss. All groups used their assigned product once a day as adjunct to twice daily toothbrushing for two minutes with a standard ADA reference toothbrush. Professional instructions were given by a dental hygienist in 01 use or floss use according to written instructions. All subjects also received a toothbrush instruction leaflet (Bass technique). Subjects were assessed for both bleeding and plaque at baseline and after two weeks and four weeks and were instructed to brush their teeth approximately 2 to 3 hours prior to their assessment. RESULTS: With respect to mean bleeding scores the ANCOVA analysis with baseline as covariate and week 4 as dependent variable showed a significant difference between groups in favor of both the oral irrigator groups. For plaque, however, no significant difference among groups was observed. CONCLUSION: When combined with manual toothbrushing the daily use of an oral irrigator, either with prototype or standard jet tip, is significantly more effective in reducing gingival bleeding scores than is the use of dental floss, as determined within the limits of this 4-week study design.


Subject(s)
Dental Devices, Home Care , Dental Plaque/therapy , Gingivitis/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Dental Plaque Index , Female , Humans , Male , Periodontal Index , Single-Blind Method , Therapeutic Irrigation/instrumentation , Young Adult
3.
J Clin Periodontol ; 38(5): 470-8, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21219394

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To test whether use of a water-cooled Nd:YAG laser adjunctive to supra- and subgingival debridement (SRP) with hand and ultrasonic instruments results in greater clinical improvement than SRP alone. Another objective was to investigate the reduction in the number of microorganisms. METHODS: This study was an examiner-blind, randomized and controlled clinical trial using a split-mouth design. Nineteen subjects with moderate-to-severe generalized periodontitis were selected. Immediately following SRP in two randomly chosen contra-lateral quadrants, all pockets 4 mm were additionally treated with the Nd:YAG laser (1064 nm, 6 W, 400 mJ). Clinical assessments (Plaque index, bleeding on pocket probing, probing pocket depth) were performed pre-treatment and at 3 months post-treatment. In each quadrant, one site was sampled for microbiological evaluation at pre-treatment, immediately post-instrumentation and 3 months post-treatment. RESULTS: At the 3-month visit, the clinical parameters had significantly improved for both regimens. No significant differences between treatment modalities were observed for any of the clinical parameters at any time. Immediately following instrumentation, the total colony forming units for both groups were significantly reduced as compared with pre-instrumentation. No significant differences between treatment modalities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Three months after SRP, no additional advantage was achieved with the additional use of the Nd:YAG laser. Microbiological findings reflect these clinical results.


Subject(s)
Chronic Periodontitis/therapy , Dental Scaling/methods , Lasers, Solid-State/therapeutic use , Periodontal Pocket/surgery , Adult , Chronic Periodontitis/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial , Combined Modality Therapy , Debridement/instrumentation , Debridement/methods , Dental Plaque Index , Dental Scaling/instrumentation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Periodontal Pocket/microbiology , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Periodontol ; 79(8): 1386-94, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18672987

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an oscillating/rotating/pulsating powered toothbrush on plaque and gingivitis prevention over a 9-month period. METHODS: The study had an examiner-masked, randomized, three-group parallel design. A total of 122 subjects >or= 18 years of age in good general health and with at least five teeth per quadrant and no pockets >or= 5 mm were included. A 3-week preexperimental period of extensive oral home care, including rinses, was started to improve gingival health. Professional oral hygiene instruction with a manual brush was provided. At baseline, subjects were assigned to one of three regimens: twice daily brushing with a manual toothbrush, a manual toothbrush and the use of floss, or a powered toothbrush. Subjects were professionally instructed in their regimen and given a prophylaxis. Two weeks later, oral hygiene reinforcement was provided. Gingival bleeding, plaque, staining, and gingival abrasion were assessed during the preexperimental period and at baseline, 10 weeks, and 6 and 9 months. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in plaque and gingivitis from the preexperimental period to baseline. At 10 weeks and 6 and 9 months, the level of plaque was statistically significantly lower with the powered toothbrush versus the other two regimens (P

Subject(s)
Dental Plaque/prevention & control , Gingivitis/prevention & control , Toothbrushing/instrumentation , Adult , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Dental Devices, Home Care , Dental Plaque Index , Equipment Design , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gingiva/injuries , Gingival Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Health Education, Dental , Humans , Hydrogen Peroxide/therapeutic use , Male , Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , Oral Hygiene/instrumentation , Periodontal Index , Single-Blind Method , Tooth Discoloration/etiology
5.
J Periodontol ; 79(8): 1395-400, 2008 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18672988

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the inhibiting effect of a chlorine dioxide mouthrinse as opposed to a mouthrinse containing chlorhexidine (0.20%) during 3 days of plaque accumulation. METHODS: At baseline, all participants (N=77) received a professional prophylaxis and were randomly assigned to the test (chlorine dioxide) or (positive) control (chlorhexidine) group. On the following 3 days, both groups rinsed twice daily for 1 minute with 10 ml test or control solution. At the end of the experimental period, plaque was assessed, and the panelists filled out a questionnaire. RESULTS: Chlorhexidine inhibited plaque growth significantly more than the mouthrinse containing chlorine dioxide (plaque index=1.39 versus 1.96, respectively; P<0.001). The results of the questionnaire showed that the panelists found chlorhexidine easier to use and more effective. However, they preferred the taste of the chlorine dioxide mouthrinse and experienced less taste alterations. CONCLUSION: Chlorine dioxide mouthrinse seems to be a less potent plaque inhibitor than chlorhexidine.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Chlorine Compounds/therapeutic use , Dental Plaque/prevention & control , Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , Oxides/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Dental Plaque Index , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Single-Blind Method , Taste/drug effects , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...