An examination of daily activities and their scripts across the adult lifespan.

In two normative studies, we examined daily scripted activities from the perspective that scripts are frequency-based knowledge structures. In Study 1 individuals recorded their daily activities for 7 consecutive days. Fifteen activities that were reported with low, moderate, and high frequency were selected for Study 2, in which individuals generated a script for each activity. The 18 most frequently generated events from each script are reported, along with their centrality and distinctiveness rankings and the number of individuals reporting each event. Overall, the mean number of events generated increased with increasing script frequency, suggesting that script representations are subject to frequency effects. Also, we found a high level of consistency across the three age groups in the events generated in each script and in their corresponding rankings of centrality and distinctiveness. Finally, we found no evidence of age or gender bias in the frequency or recency of engaging in each of the scripted activities.

Working memory and apolipoprotein E: what's the connection?

Two robust findings in the Alzheimer's literature are that patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) show executive function and primacy deficits. The present study examined whether we would find similar deficits when comparing two groups of middle-aged individuals who differed with respect to genetic risk for AD, based on their apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype. All individuals were screened as normal on a battery of standardized cognitive measures. They were tested on the "Operation span task", which engages the central executive component of working memory [J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 128 (1999) 309, J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 126 (1997) 211, J. Mem. Language 39 (1998) 418] by dividing attention between processing math operations and remembering words. Individuals were grouped according to APOE genotype ( epsilon 4 carrier versus epsilon 4 non-carrier), matched on age and education, and their Total span and Primacy scores were compared. Despite having no overt symptoms of dementia or deficits on a series of standardized psychometric tests, the epsilon 4 carriers showed divided-attention and primacy deficits on the Operation span task, when compared to the epsilon 4 non-carriers. As a point of comparison, Primacy scores were extracted from the first trial of the "Buschke selective reminding task" [J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 12 (1973) 543] for these same individuals, and no group differences were found. The Buschke task is a list-learning task that does not require divided attention. These findings suggested that the epsilon 4 carriers were less able to divide their attention, when compared to the epsilon 4 non-carriers. The findings provide the first direct evidence for a relationship between APOE genotype and cognitive performance on measures of divided attention and primacy with non-demented individuals who showed no cognitive impairments on standardized measures.

The role of working memory capacity in retrieval.

The verbal fluency task requires generation of category exemplars and appears to be an example of what M. Moscovitch (1995) calls a strategic test of memory retrieval. Four experiments explored the role of individual differences in working memory (WM) capacity on verbal fluency under various secondary load conditions. High WM participants consistently recalled more exemplars. However, load conditions caused a decline in recall only for high WM participants. Low WM participants showed no effect of secondary workload on exemplar generation. WM group differences and load effects were observed even in the 1st min of retrieval, which suggests that differences were not due to differences in knowledge. A model of retrieval is supported that relies on cue-based-automatic activation, monitoring of output for errors, controlled suppression of previously recalled items, and controlled strategic search.

Immunolocalization and expression of bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 in fracture healing.

Recently, it has become increasingly evident that fracture healing involves a complex interaction of many local and systemic regulatory factors. The roles of some of these growth factors have been described; however, little is understood about the presence of the bone morphogenetic proteins in fracture repair, despite the fact that they are the most potent osteoinductive proteins known. This study defines and characterizes the physiologic presence, localization, and chronology of the bone morphogenetic proteins in fracture healing with an established rat fracture healing model. With use of a recently developed monoclonal antibody against bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 developed with standard avidin-biotin complex/immunoperoxidase protocols, frozen undecalcified fracture calluses were analyzed semiquantitatively for the percentage of various types of fracture cells staining positively. During the early stages of fracture healing, only a minimum number of primitive cells stained positively in the fracture callus. As the process of endochondral ossification proceeded, the presence of bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 increased dramatically, especially in the primitive mesenchymal and chondrocytic cells. While the cartilaginous component of the callus matured with a concomitant decrease in the number of primitive cells, there was a concomitant decrease in both the intensity and the number of positively staining cells. As osteoblasts started to lay down woven bone on the chondroid matrix, these osteoblastic cells exhibited strong positive staining. The intensity of this staining decreased, however, as lamellar bone replaced the primitive woven bone. A similar observation was noted for the areas of the callus undergoing intramembranous ossification. Initially, within several days after the fracture, periosteal cells and osteoblasts exhibited intense staining for bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4. As the woven bone was replaced with mature lamellar bone, this staining decreased. These data, and the awareness of the strong osteoinductive capacities of bone morphogenetic protein, suggest that bone morphogenetic proteins 2 and 4 are important regulators of cell differentiation during fracture repair.