Double screw versus angular stable plate fixation of scaphoid waist nonunions in combination with intraoperative extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT).

INTRODUCTION: Over the past years, different fixation techniques focused on rotational stability in order to increase stability and stimulate union rates. Additionally, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has gained importance in the treatment of delayed and nonunions. Purpose of this study was to compare the radiological and clinical outcome of two headless compression screws (HCS) and plate fixation in scaphoid nonunions, in combination with intraoperative high energy ESWT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with scaphoid nonunions were treated by using a nonvascularized bone graft from the iliac crest and stabilization with either two HCS or a volar angular stable scaphoid plate. All patients received one ESWT session with 3000 impulses and energy flux per pulse of 0.41 mJ/mm2 intraoperatively. Clinical assessment included range of motion (ROM), pain according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), grip strength, disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Score, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Score, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and modified Green O'Brien (Mayo) Wrist Score. To confirm union, a CT scan of the wrist was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients returned for clinical and radiological examination. Out of these, 29 (91%) showed bony union. All patients treated with two HCS compared to 16 out of 19 (84%) patients treated by plate showed bony union on the CT scans. The difference was not statistically significant. However, at a mean follow-up interval of 34 months, no significant differences could be found in ROM, pain, grip strength and patient-reported outcome measurements between the two HCS and plate group. Height-to-length ratio and capitolunate angle improved significantly in both groups compared to preoperative. CONCLUSIONS: Scaphoid nonunion stabilization by using two HCS or angular stable volar plate fixation and intraoperative ESWT results in comparable high union rates and good functional outcome. Due to the higher rate for a secondary intervention (plate removal), HCS might be preferable as first choice, whereas the scaphoid plate fixation should be reserved for recalcitrant (substantial bone loss, humpback deformity or failed prior surgical intervention) scaphoid nonunions.

Wireless microcurrent stimulation improves blood flow in burn wounds.

RATIONALE: Skin breakdown, as in wounds, leads to an electric potential, defined as current of injury with the intent of wound closure. Burn wounds are defined by different zones of perfusion having a direct influence on further therapy (e.g. conservative management or skin grafting). We studied immediate, quantifiable effects of electric stimulation on skin perfusion in burn wounds. METHOD: Wireless Microcurrent Stimulation (WMCS) was utilised as an adjunct therapeutic modality in 10 patients with partial thickness burn wounds. Microcirculation in the skin was quantified with a Laser Doppler (LDI) before and after WMCS treatment. We included a control group of 10 healthy individuals. RESULTS: A single application of WMCS significantly increased mean flow, velocity and subsequently, haemoglobin and oxygen saturation in partial thickness burn wounds. In healthy skin these parameters increased, but were far less pronounced than in thermally injured skin. CONCLUSION: This study revealed, for the first time that non-contact WMCS improves blood flow in critically perfused partial thickness burn wounds without disturbing the wound or systemically affecting the patient and may represent a promising adjunct tool in burn treatment, with the potential of faster healing by enhanced perfusion of burn wounds and reduction of the zone of stasis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Rehabilitation after distal radius fractures: is there a need for immobilization and physiotherapy?

Although the literature generally agrees that displaced distal radius fractures require surgery, no single consensus exists concerning the length of immobilization and type of post-operative physiotherapeutic rehabilitation program. Palmar locking plate fixation represents a very stable fixation of the distal radius, and was assessed biomechanically in various studies. Surprisingly, most authors report additional immobilization after plate fixation. One reason might be due to the pain caused during active wrist mobilization in the early post-operative stages or secondly to protect the osteosynthesis in the early healing stages preventing secondary loss of reduction. This article addresses the biomechanical principles, current available evidence for early mobilization/immobilization and impact of physiotherapy after operatively treated distal radius fractures.

Biomechanical considerations on a CT-based treatment-oriented classification in radius fractures.

A wide range of different classifications exist for distal radius fractures (DRF). Most of them are based on plane X-rays and do not give us any information on how to treat these fractures. A biomechanical understanding of the mechanical forces underlying each fracture type is important to treat each injury specifically and ensure the optimal choice for stabilization. The main cause of DRFs are forces acting on the carpus and the radius as well as the position of the wrist in relation to the radius. Reconstructing the mechanism of the injury gives insight into which structures are involved, such as ruptured ligaments, bone fragments as well as the dislocated osteoligamentous units. This article attempts to define certain key fragments, which seem crucial to reduce and stabilize each type of DRF. Once the definition is established, an ideal implant can be selected to sufficiently maintain reduction of these key fragments. Additionally, the perfect approach is selected. By applying the following principles, the surgeon may be assisted in choosing the ideal form of treatment approach and implant selection.

Functional and radiological outcome of distal radius fractures stabilized by volar-locking plate with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.

INTRODUCTION: Distal radius fractures (DRF) are the most common fractures of the upper extremities and incidence is expected to continue rising as life expectancy increases. Palmar locking plate stabilizing has since become the standard treatment for dorsally displaced DRF. Main aim of this study was to investigate correlation between radiological and clinical outcome in patients stabilized by palmar locking plate with a minimum follow-up of one year. METHODS: A total of 524 patients with DRF, stabilized using palmar angular stable locking plate fixation were included in the study. Of these, 117 patients had to be excluded and another 177 were not accessible. The study group thus compromised 230 patients who returned for the follow-up investigation and were followed-up clinically and radiologically with a mean follow-up interval of 20 months. Outcome was evaluated using pain, range of motion (ROM) and grip strength parameters. In addition, self-assessment by patients was registered on the QuickDASH, PRWE and Mayo Score. The immediate postoperative and final checkup radiographs were scrutinized for alignment and intra-articular step-off. RESULTS: Bivariant correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between ulnar variance and QuickDASH (r = 0.18, p = 0.01), grip strength (r = - 0.18, p = 0.04) and Mayo Score (r = - 0.23, p = 0.001). No significant differences could be found between an unacceptable (> 2 mm) and acceptable (< 2 mm) ulnar variance in respect of pain, ROM, grip strength and patient-reported outcome measurements. Age, gender, additional fracture to the ulnar styloid, or type of postoperative immobilization showed no significant or clinical important impact on the final patient-reported outcome. No significant differences in incidence of complications, ROM or loss of reduction could be found in any patients over or under 65 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Stabilization of DRF by palmar angular stable locking plate is a safe form of treatment and results in a good clinical and radiological outcome with low complication rate. Ulnar variance showed a significant correlation to grip strength, QuickDASH and Mayo Score, but an unacceptable ulnar variance (> 2 mm) was not associated with a worse clinical important outcome. Age (< 65/> 65 years), gender and type of immobilization had no impact on the complication rate or in the final functional or radiological outcome.

Salvage procedure after malunited distal radius fractures and management of pain and stiffness.

Indications for surgical treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF) remain controversial in the literature, especially in elderly patients. Complication rates after operatively treated DRF are low and well documented. These include malunion, degenerative osteoarthritis in the radiocarpal joint and subsequently pain and impaired hand function. If conservative treatment fails then salvage procedures are necessary. This review summarizes the therapeutic options available to treat degenerative osteoarthritis after malunited distal radius fractures, regardless of the initial operative or conservative treatment.

Complications after operatively treated distal radius fractures.

In the recent years, treatment of distal radius fractures (DRF) has advanced considerably. Surgical fixation with palmar angular stable plate has gained popularity, due to a reported lower complication rate when compared to dorsal fixation. The type of trauma or injury, surgical procedure and impaired bone quality are all contributors to complications in DRF. The main aim of this review is to summarize the most common complications and possible therapeutic solutions. In addition, strategies for minimizing these complications will be discussed.

Indications, surgical approach, reduction, and stabilization techniques of distal radius fractures.

Distal Radius fractures (DRF) are one of the most common injuries in the upper extremity and incidence is expected to rise due to a growing elderly population. The complex decision to treat patients operatively or conservatively depends on a large variety of parameters which have to be considered. No unanimous consensus has been reached yet, which operative approach and fixation technique would produce the best postoperative functional results with lowest complication rates. This article addresses the available evidence for indications, approaches, reduction, and fixation techniques in treating DRF.

Early complications and radiological outcome after distal radius fractures stabilized by volar angular stable locking plate.

INTRODUCTION: Distal radius fractures (DRF) are the most common fractures of the upper extremities. The incidence is expected to continue rising in the next years due to the increased life expectancy. Palmar locking plate stabilizing has since become the standard treatment for dorsally displaced DRF with a complication rate of 8-39% reported in the literature. Main aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of complications after DRF stabilization using palmar angular stable locking plate. METHODS: A retrospective medical records review conducted from January 2013 to December 2016 included a total of 392 patients with DRF, that were stabilized using palmar angular stable locking plate and showed a minimum follow-up of 3 months. The group comprised 259 female and 133 male patients with a mean follow-up interval of 11 months (range 3-52 months). All recorded complications were documented. Range of motion (ROM) in extension, flexion, supination, pronation, radial- and ulnar deviation of the last follow-up was noted. Age was divided into younger than 65 years (< 65 years) and older than 65 years (≥ 65 years). The primary, immediate postoperative and final checkup radiographs were scrutinized for alignment and intra-articular step-off. RESULTS: A total of 51 (13%) early and 17 late (4%) complications were recorded in 392 patients. The most common complications included carpal tunnel syndrome (3%), complex regional pain syndrome (3%) and loss of reduction (2%). Of the 68 complications, only 25 (6%) were directly related to the plate. 73% of all complications occurred in AO type C fractures. Patients without complications showed a significantly better ROM in extension, flexion, pronation and supination than patients with complications. No significant differences in incidence of complications, ROM or loss of reduction could be found between patients over and under 65 years of age. Gender and type of immobilization showed no significant influence on the complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: Stabilization of DRF by palmar angular stable locking plate is a safe form of treatment. In the majority of the cases a good clinical and radiological outcome with no complications was documented. Gender and type of immobilization had no impact on the complication rate and an age over 65 years is not associated with an increased risk for complications or restricted ROM.