Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
J Voice ; 2024 May 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38806325

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 upsurge in orotracheal intubation (OTI) has opened a new opportunity for studying associated complications. Vocal fold motion impairment (VFMI) is a known complication of OTI. The present study sought to determine the impact of OTI and prolonged OTI on the risk of developing VFMI; to identify both risk and protective factors associated with it. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Multicenter. METHODS: Medical charts were reviewed for all patients that received invasive mechanical ventilation with a subsequent flexible laryngoscopic assessment between March 2020 and March 2022. The main outcomes were the presence of VFMI, including immobility (VFI) and hypomobility (VFH). RESULTS: A total of 155 patients were included, 119 (76.8%) COVID-19 and 36 (23.2%) non-COVID-19 patients; overall 82 (52.9%) were diagnosed with VFMI. Eighty (52.3%) patients underwent a tracheostomy. The median (IQR) intubation duration was 18 (11-24.25) days, while the median (IQR) time to tracheostomy was 22 (16-29). In the adjusted model, we observed there was a 68% increased risk for VFMI from day 21 of intubation (RR: 1.68; 95% CI 1.07-2.65; P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: VFMI is a frequent complication in severely ill patients that undergo intubation. A prolonged OTI was associated with an increased risk of VFMI, highlighting the importance of timely tracheostomy. Further research is needed to confirm these findings in other subsets of critically ill patients.

2.
Auris Nasus Larynx ; 51(1): 106-112, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37365040

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Laryngeal dystonia (LD) is characterized by irregular and involuntary task-specific spasms of the intrinsic laryngeal muscles. There is no curative treatment for it, however, laryngeal botulinum neurotoxin injections (BoNT-I) are considered the standard of care therapy. This study aims to characterize the population of LD patients and to assess the results of laryngeal BoNT-I. METHODS: A Retrospective cohort study was conducted. Medical records were reviewed for all the patients with LD diagnosis seen in the Voice Unit of the Red de Salud UCChristus between January 2013 and October 2021. Biodemographic, clinical and treatment data were collected. Additionally, a telephonic survey was completed by the patients that underwent laryngeal BoNT-I, including self-reported voice outcomes and Voice Handicap Index 10 (VHI-10). RESULTS: Of the 34 patients with LD included in the study, 23 received a total of 93 laryngeal BoNT-I and 19 completed the telephone survey. The majority (97%) of the injections corresponded to patients with adductor LD and 3% to abductor LD. Patients received a median of 3 (1-17) injections, with a more frequent cricothyroid approach (94.4%), while the thyrohyoid approach accounted for 5.6% of cases. Most injections were bilateral (96.8%). A significant improvement in the vocal quality and effort was noted after the last injection and the overall BoNT-I treatment (P < 0.001). Similarly, the VHI-10 score improved from a median of 31 (7-40) to 2 (0-19) (P < 0.001) after the last injection. A post-treatment breathy voice was reported in 95% of patients, and dysphagia to liquids and solids in 68% and 21%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Laryngeal BoNT-I is an effective treatment for LD, achieving an improvement in self-reported vocal quality and VHI-10 scores, and a reduction of the self-reported vocal effort. Adverse effects are mild in the majority of cases, constituting a safe and effective therapy for these patients.


Subject(s)
Botulinum Toxins, Type A , Botulinum Toxins , Dysphonia , Dystonia , Humans , Botulinum Toxins/therapeutic use , Dystonia/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Dysphonia/drug therapy , Dysphonia/diagnosis , Voice Quality , Laryngeal Muscles , Treatment Outcome , Botulinum Toxins, Type A/therapeutic use
3.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 169(4): 971-987, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37232508

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to create a synthetic laryngeal microsurgery simulation model and training program; to assess its face, content, and construct validity; and to review the available phonomicrosurgery simulation models in the literature. STUDY DESIGN: Nonrandomly assigned control study. SETTING: Simulation training course for the otolaryngology residency program at Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. METHODS: Resident (postgraduate year 1 [PGY1]/PGY2) and expert groups were recruited. A laryngeal microsurgery synthetic model was developed. Nine tasks were designed and assessed through a set of programmed exercises with increasing difficulty, to fulfill 5 surgical competencies. Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device sensors applied to the participants' hands measured time and movements. The activities were video-recorded and blindly assessed by 2 laryngologists using a specific and global rating scale (SRS and GRS). A 5-point Likert survey assessing validity was completed by experts. RESULTS: Eighteen participants were recruited (14 residents and 4 experts). Experts performed significantly better than residents in the SRS (p = .003), and GRS (p = .004). Internal consistency was demonstrated for the SRS (α = .972, p < .001). Experts had a shorter execution time (p = .007), and path length with the right hand (p = .04). The left hand did not show significant differences. The survey assessing validity resulted in a median 36 out of 40 points score for face validity; and 43 out of 45 points score, for global content validity. The literature review revealed 20 available phonomicrosurgery simulation models, only 6 with construct validity. CONCLUSION: The face, content, and construct validity of the laryngeal microsurgery simulation training program were established. It could be replicated and incorporated into residents' curricula.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Larynx , Otolaryngology , Simulation Training , Humans , Microsurgery/education , Larynx/surgery , Otolaryngology/education , Clinical Competence
4.
OTO Open ; 6(4): 2473974X221128928, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36274921

ABSTRACT

Objective: In a context of increasingly limited surgical exposition, enhanced by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic context, the objective of this article is to explain the development of a novel low-cost and simple replication animal-based septoplasty training model for otolaryngology residents, to assess its face and construct validity, and to validate a specific rating scale for each task. Study Design: Experimental study. Setting: Surgical simulation laboratory. Methods: Septoplasty experts divided the procedure into key tasks. A simulator model to perform tasks was developed using pig ears to imitate human nasal septum cartilage, and a Specific Rating Scale was constructed. Trainees and faculty performed all tasks in the model. The participants were videotaped, and operative time, hand movements, and path length were recorded using a motion sensor device. Two blinded experts evaluated the videos with Global and Specific Rating Scales. All participants answered a satisfaction survey. Results: Fifteen subjects were recruited (7 trainees and 8 faculty). Significantly higher Global Rating Scale score, shorter operative time and path length, and fewer hand movements were observed in the faculty group. The satisfaction survey showed high applicability to a real scenario (mean score of 4.6 out of 5). Specific Rating Scale showed construct and concurrent validity and high reliability. Conclusion: This simulation model and its specific rating scale can be accurately used as a validated surgical assessment tool for endonasal septoplasty skills. Its low cost and simple replicability make it a potentially useful tool in any otolaryngology surgical training program.

5.
J Voice ; 2022 Mar 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35279347

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the anatomical and voice results of conservative management of patients diagnosed with contralateral reactive lesions (CRL) in our voice unit. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of all new adult patients with benign vocal fold lesions with or without CRL, treated in the voice unit at Universidad Católica Clinical Hospital between 2015 and 2019. Patients were divided into two groups, without CRL (group A) and with CRL (group B). Analysis of preoperative and 1 month after surgery videostroboscopy, GRBASI, Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10), Voice Related Quality of Life (VRQOL) surveys and management of CRL was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were included, 45 (72.6%) had CRL. When compared, bivariate and multivariate analysis revealed that age was significantly associated as a mild protective factor of presenting a CRL (P < 0.05). No significative differences were found between preoperative group A and B perceptual voice analysis or voice surveys. In terms of CRL management, 30 (66.6%) were injected, conservative management with observation was performed in 12 patients (26.7%) and, three (6.7%) were surgically resected. After 1 month follow-up, 32 (71.1%) had complete CRL resolution, eight (17.8%) had CRL persistence and, five (11.1%) had CRL recurrence. Postoperative vocal outcomes, GRBASI, VHI-10 and VRQOL showed significative improvement as compared with preoperative data for each group. No differences were seen between group A and B in terms of postoperative vocal outcomes. CONCLUSION: CRL are prevalent, and their management is controversial. On our study 72.6% of BFVL presented with CRL and 93.3% of them were conservatively managed. Improvement in perceptual voice analysis and quality of life surveys were similar in both groups.

6.
Medwave ; 19(3): e7610, 2019 Apr 08.
Article in Spanish, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30985738

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Ménière's disease is a disorder of the inner ear characterized by episodes of spontaneous vertigo, fluctuating hearing loss and tinnitus. Positive pressure therapy has been used to reduce the intensity and frequency of episodes, but it is not clear whether it is actually effective. METHODS: We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified five systematic reviews including 22 studies overall, of which five were randomized trials. We concluded positive pressure therapy probably leads to slightly worse hearing and makes little or no difference in the intensity of vertigo. In addition, we are uncertain whether positive pressure therapy improves functionality or decreases vertigo attacks as the certainty of the evidence has been assessed as very low.


INTRODUCCIÓN: La enfermedad de Ménière es una anomalía del oído interno caracterizada por episodios de vértigo espontáneo, hipoacusia fluctuante y tinnitus. La terapia con presión positiva ha sido utilizada para reducir la intensidad y la frecuencia de las crisis, pero existe controversia respecto a su eficacia. MÉTODOS: Para responder esta pregunta utilizamos Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante búsquedas en múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, reanalizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis y preparamos tablas de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Identificamos cinco revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyeron 22 estudios primarios, de los cuales cinco corresponden a ensayos aleatorizados. Concluimos que la terapia de presión positiva probablemente empeora levemente la audición y no reduce la intensidad del vértigo. Además, no es posible establecer con claridad si la terapia de presión positiva mejora la funcionalidad o si disminuye la frecuencia de los ataques de vértigo, porque la certeza de la evidencia existente ha sido evaluada como muy baja.


Subject(s)
Meniere Disease/therapy , Databases, Factual , Hearing Loss/etiology , Hearing Loss/therapy , Humans , Meniere Disease/physiopathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Tinnitus/etiology , Tinnitus/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Vertigo/etiology , Vertigo/therapy
7.
Medwave ; 18(7): e7347, 2018 Nov 23.
Article in Spanish, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30507897

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chronic rhinosinusitis is a high prevalence chronic inflammatory disease that involves nasal mucosa and paranasal sinuses. Immunoglobulin E is an inflammatory mediator that plays an etiopathogenic role in this condition, so omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin E monoclonal antibody, might be a therapeutic alternative. METHODS: We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified five systematic reviews that included five primary studies overall, of which two correspond to randomized trials. We concluded it is not clear whether omalizumab leads to an improvement in the nasal polyps scale, quality of life, general well-being or nasal symptoms in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, because the certainty of the evidence is very low. On the other hand, omalizumab is probably associated with frequent adverse effects.


INTRODUCCIÓN: La rinosinusitis crónica es una enfermedad inflamatoria crónica de alta prevalencia que compromete la mucosa de la cavidad nasal y senos paranasales. La inmunoglobulina E es un mediador inflamatorio que juega un rol etiopatogénico en esta condición, por lo que se ha planteado que omalizumab, un anticuerpo monoclonal anti-inmunoglobulina E, podría constituir una alternativa de tratamiento. MÉTODOS: Realizamos una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el cribado de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, analizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Identificamos cinco revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyeron cinco estudios primarios, de los cuales dos corresponden a ensayos controlados aleatorizados. Concluimos que en pacientes con rinosinusitis crónica, no está claro si omalizumab lleva a una mejoría en la escala de pólipos nasales, la calidad de vida, el bienestar general o los síntomas nasales porque la certeza de la evidencia es muy baja. Por otra parte, el uso de omalizumab probablemente se asocia a efectos adversos frecuentes.


Subject(s)
Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Anti-Allergic Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Allergic Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Databases, Factual , Humans , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Nasal Polyps/immunology , Omalizumab/adverse effects , Omalizumab/pharmacology , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Rhinitis/immunology , Sinusitis/immunology
8.
Medwave ; 18(8): e7372, 2018 Dec 10.
Article in Spanish, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30550535

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Spontaneous epistaxis is one of the most frequent problems in emergency services. New treatment alternatives have emerged, including topical tranexamic acid. However, there is controversy about the actual efficacy of this alternative. METHODS: We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified five systematic reviews that analyzed only one primary study, corresponding to a randomized trial. We concluded it is not clear whether topical tranexamic acid has any impact on hemostasis or risk of rebleeding because the certainty of the evidence is very low. On the other hand, its use could increase adverse effects.


INTRODUCCIÓN: La epistaxis espontánea es uno de los problemas más frecuentes en consultas de urgencia. Existen nuevas alternativas de tratamiento, entre las que se encuentra el ácido tranexámico tópico. Sin embargo, su rol en el manejo de la epistaxis espontánea sigue siendo poco claro, existiendo controversia en cuanto a su efectividad y seguridad. MÉTODOS: Realizamos una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el cribado de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, analizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Identificamos cinco revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyeron un estudio primario, el cual corresponde a un ensayo aleatorizado. Concluimos que no está claro si el uso de ácido tranexámico tópico impacta en hemostasia o resangrado porque la certeza de la evidencia es muy baja, además su uso podría aumentar los efectos adversos.


Subject(s)
Antifibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Epistaxis/drug therapy , Tranexamic Acid/administration & dosage , Administration, Topical , Databases, Factual , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
9.
Medwave ; 18(6): e7301, 2018 Oct 24.
Article in Spanish, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30365483

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Chronic rhinosinusitis is the inflammation of sinonasal mucosa lasting longer than 12 weeks. Two clinical forms are distinguished: chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps and without polyps. Patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps exhibit high levels of interleukin 5, which promotes differentiation and survival of eosinophils. So, minimizing their circulation has been proposed as a new treatment strategy. However, there is no clarity regarding its real effectiveness. METHODS: To answer this question we used Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified three systematic reviews included three primary studies overall, all corresponding to randomized trials. We concluded inhibitors of interleukin 5 might decrease nasal polyps score. Although they might be associated with adverse effects, these would be infrequent and of low severity. However, the certainty of the evidence is low.


INTRODUCCIÓN: La rinosinusitis crónica es la inflamación de la mucosa nasosinusal de duración superior a 12 semanas. Se distinguen dos formas clínicas: rinosinusitis crónica con pólipos y sin pólipos. Los pacientes con rinosinusitis crónica con pólipos presentan niveles elevados de interleukina 5, la cual promueve la diferenciación y supervivencia de eosinófilos, por lo que se ha propuesto minimizar su circulación como una nueva estrategia de tratamiento. Sin embargo, no hay claridad respecto a su real efectividad. MÉTODOS: Para responder esta pregunta utilizamos Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante búsquedas en múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, reanalizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Identificamos tres revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyeron tres estudios primarios, todos correspondientes a ensayos aleatorizados. Concluimos que los inhibidores de interleukina 5 podrían disminuir el puntaje de pólipos nasales. Si bien podrían asociarse a efectos adversos, estos serían poco frecuentes y de baja severidad. Sin embargo, la certeza de la evidencia es baja.


Subject(s)
Interleukin-5/immunology , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Chronic Disease , Databases, Factual , Humans , Interleukin-5/antagonists & inhibitors , Nasal Polyps/drug therapy , Nasal Polyps/immunology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Rhinitis/immunology , Sinusitis/immunology
10.
Medwave ; 18(2): e7188, 2018 Mar 28.
Article in Spanish, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29624570

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Ménière`s disease is an inner ear disorder characterized by episodes of spontaneous vertigo, fluctuating hearing loss and tinnitus. Diuretics have been widely used for the treatment of attacks, but there is controversy about their effectiveness. METHODS: To answer this question we used Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified three systematic reviews including nineteen studies overall, of which four were randomized trials. We concluded it is not clear whether diuretics lead to a symptomatic improvement of vertigo or an objective decrease in hearing loss in patients with Ménière`s disease, because the certainty of the evidence is very low.


INTRODUCCIÓN: La enfermedad de Ménière es una anomalía del oído interno caracterizada por episodios de vértigo espontáneo, hipoacusia fluctuante y tinnitus. Los diuréticos han sido ampliamente utilizados para el tratamiento de las crisis de esta enfermedad, pero existe controversia respecto a su eficacia. MÉTODOS: Para responder esta pregunta utilizamos Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante búsquedas en múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, reanalizamos los datos de los estudios primarios y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Identificamos tres revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyen diecinueve estudios primarios, de los cuales, cuatro son ensayos aleatorizados. Concluimos que no está claro si el uso de diuréticos lleva a una mejoría sintomática del vértigo o a una disminución objetiva de la hipoacusia en pacientes con enfermedad de Ménière, porque la certeza de la evidencia es muy baja.


Subject(s)
Diuretics/therapeutic use , Meniere Disease/drug therapy , Databases, Factual , Hearing Loss/drug therapy , Hearing Loss/etiology , Humans , Meniere Disease/physiopathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Tinnitus/drug therapy , Tinnitus/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Vertigo/drug therapy , Vertigo/etiology
11.
Medwave ; 17(8): e7068, 2017 Oct 31.
Article in Spanish, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29099816

ABSTRACT

PROBLEM: Meniere’s disease is an inner ear disorder characterized by episodes of spontaneous vertigo, fluctuating hearing loss and tinnitus. Betahistine has been used to reduce intensity and frecuency of vertigo attacks, but there is controversy regarding its effectiveness. METHODS: To answer this question we used Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We identified four systematic reviews including 12 trials overall. We concluded betahistine might reduce the number of attacks, vertigo intensity and lead to a symptomatic improvement according to global judgement in patients with Meniere’s disease, but the certainty of evidence is low. On the other hand, it probably does not have significant adverse effects.


INTRODUCCIÓN: La enfermedad de Ménière es una anomalía del oído interno caracterizada por episodios de vértigo espontáneo, hipoacusia fluctuante y tinnitus. La betahistina ha sido utilizada para reducir la intensidad y frecuencia de las crisis de vértigo, pero existe controversia respecto a su eficacia. MÉTODOS: Para responder esta pregunta utilizamos Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud a nivel mundial, la cual es mantenida mediante búsquedas en múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, reanalizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis, preparamos tablas de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. RESULTADOS Y CONCLUSIONES: Identificamos 4 revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyen 12 estudios primarios, todos ellos corresponden a ensayos aleatorizados. Concluimos que el uso de betahistina podría disminuir el número de crisis, la intensidad del vértigo y llevar a una mejoría global sintomática en los pacientes con enfermedad de Ménière, pero la certeza de la evidencia es baja. Por otra parte, probablemente no tiene efectos adversos importantes.


Subject(s)
Betahistine/therapeutic use , Meniere Disease/drug therapy , Vasodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Betahistine/adverse effects , Humans , Meniere Disease/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , Vasodilator Agents/adverse effects , Vertigo/drug therapy , Vertigo/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...