Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Hosp Pharm ; 48(10): 2154-7, 1991 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1781471

ABSTRACT

The potential for justifying the cost of a part-time clinical pharmacist position was evaluated. Patients in the medical and surgical intensive-care units of a community hospital were monitored two hours per day for 32 weekdays by a part-time staff pharmacist. The pharmacist completed an initial review of the charts of all patients newly admitted to the units and further evaluated each medical record for at least five minutes each day to determine the need for drug therapy interventions. The pharmacist contacted physicians to make any recommendations for changes in therapy. At the end of the study, the pharmacist calculated the difference in the costs of the original and recommended drug regimens for all recommendations accepted by physicians. A total of 147 patients were monitored during the 32-day period. There were 122 recommended interventions for 60 patients, and 101 (83%) of these recommendations were accepted. Estimated drug cost savings totaled $1651.35, but the cost of the pharmacist, $2599.35, resulted in a net cost to the hospital of $948. There was no significant difference in drug cost savings with respect to the day of the week when the monitoring was performed, the time of day, or the interaction of day with time. A part-time clinical pharmacist in the intensive-care unit of a community hospital reduced the costs associated with drug therapy, but the savings realized were not sufficient to offset the cost of the position.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Community , Intensive Care Units , Pharmacy Service, Hospital , Drug Costs , Drug Therapy/economics , Hospitals, Community/economics , Intensive Care Units/economics , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/economics , Salaries and Fringe Benefits , Workforce
2.
Drug Intell Clin Pharm ; 22(12): 941-5, 1988 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3072172

ABSTRACT

Ursodiol, a naturally occurring bile acid, has gained Food and Drug Administration approval for the dissolution of cholesterol gallstones. Ursodiol inhibits hepatic cholesterol synthesis and secretion. Lithocholic acid, a potentially hepatotoxic metabolite of ursodiol and chenodiol, may accumulate to a lesser extent with ursodiol than with chenodiol. Enterohepatic recirculation of ursodiol and its metabolites occurs and is essential to the dissolution of cholesterol gallstones. Complete dissolution has been achieved in 17 percent of patients with noncalcified, radiolucent, floating, cholesterol gallstones. Recurrence of cholesterol gallstones may occur in over one-half of initial responders. Diarrhea reported in up to 50 percent of the patients on chenodiol has been reported in only 4 percent of patients treated with ursodiol. Increased mean aspartate aminotransferase levels to more than twice the pretreatment level seen with chenodiol therapy have not been reported with ursodiol. Reportedly fewer adverse reactions may give ursodiol a major advantage over chenodiol in hospital formulary considerations.


Subject(s)
Chenodeoxycholic Acid/therapeutic use , Cholelithiasis/drug therapy , Deoxycholic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Ursodeoxycholic Acid/therapeutic use , Chenodeoxycholic Acid/pharmacology , Humans , Ursodeoxycholic Acid/pharmacology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...