Feasibility and accuracy of using mobile phone images of electrocardiograms to initiate the cardiac catheterization process.

We assessed the feasibility of interpreting the presence of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) using ECGs captured and transmitted by mobile phones. Transmitted ECGs were interpreted by four independent and blinded physicians, who classified them as STEMI, non-STEMI or indeterminate. After 2-4 weeks the same physicians were given the original paper ECGs for interpretation. In total, 87 ECGs were randomly selected for review. The overall agreement between the digital image readings and the printed copy readings was 94%. Of the 87 patients, 65 (75%) had cardiac catheterization following a STEMI ECG and 22 (25%) did not receive cardiac catheterization. The accuracy of digital ECGs and printed ECGs when compared to the findings from cardiac catheterization was similar. Agreement in ECG interpretations between printed images and mobile phone images was excellent, and both had similar accuracy in activating the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Mobile phone transmission is an inexpensive method of evaluating ECG images sent from pre-hospital settings to the emergency department.

Digital images taken with a mobile phone can assist in the triage of neurosurgical patients to a level 1 trauma centre.

We investigated whether head CT images captured using a mobile phone would be of sufficient quality for neurosurgeons at a level 1 trauma centre to make decisions about whether to transfer patients from referring hospitals. All patients who had been transferred from outside facilities with reported intracranial pathology during 2008 were identified. Two emergency medicine physicians selected 1-3 images from the hospital archive that best represented the pathology described by the radiologist and the medical record. The images were photographed in a darkened room using a smart phone. The mobile phone images and clinical history were reviewed by two neurosurgeons independently. The neurosurgeons rated the adequacy and quality of the images, and indicated whether the images would have changed their transfer decision. Based on clinical data alone, neurosurgeon A would have transferred 64 (73%) patients and neurosurgeon B 39 (44%). After images were provided, A would have transferred 67 (76%) and B would have transferred 49 (56%). The availability of the images significantly altered the transfer decision by A in 25 cases (28%) (P = 0.024) and by B in 28 cases (32%) (P < 0.001). The level of agreement between the two neurosurgeons significantly increased from 53% (kappa = 0.11) to 75% (kappa = 0.47) (P < 0.001). Mobile-phone images of CT scans appear to provide adequate images for triaging patients and helping with transfer decisions of neurosurgical cases.

Bedside ultrasound evaluation of tendon injuries.

OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the overall accuracy of bedside extremity tendon ultrasound performed by emergency physicians in the emergency department. We also sought to investigate whether or not bedside tendon ultrasonography can be used to expedite the diagnosis and discharge planning in patients with suspected tendon injuries. METHODS: This was a prospective study conducted at 2 academic level 1 trauma centers. Thirty-four patients were enrolled and underwent a comprehensive physical examination of the injured extremity, followed by a bedside ultrasound evaluation to look for tendon disruption. Results of the tendon ultrasound were compared against the findings seen during wound exploration in the emergency department, wound exploration in the operating room, or results from an extremity magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: There were 6 finger injuries, 11 hand injuries, 6 arm injuries, 6 forearm injuries, and 5 lower extremity injuries. Of the 34 total patients, 4 patients had partial tendon injuries, 9 suffered from 100% tendon laceration or rupture, and 21 had no tendon injury noted on exploration or MRI. Bedside ultrasound had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100%, 95%, and 97%, respectively. Physical examination had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100%, 76%, and 85%, respectively. Average time to bedside ultrasound was 46.3 minutes compared with 138.6 minutes for wound irrigation and exploration, MRI, or surgery consultation. CONCLUSION: Bedside ultrasound is more sensitive and specific than physical examination for detecting tendon lacerations, and takes less time to perform than traditional wound exploration techniques or MRI.

Comparison of Broselow tape measurements versus physician estimations of pediatric weights.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the agreement of physician estimates compared with Broselow tape measurements in accurately determining children's weights. Our secondary objective was to evaluate whether physician adjustment of the Broselow tape weight measurement is a better estimate of pediatric weight compared with either method alone. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary children's hospital. Children between the ages of 0 and 14 years consecutively registered in the pediatric ED were eligible for enrollment. Height, weight, body mass index, and Broselow tape measurement were obtained for all subjects. Blinded ED physicians provided estimates for weight and body habitus for enrolled subjects. Physicians next were given the Broselow weight measurement and then submitted a second, amended estimate (hybrid). Percentage differences were used to analyze the discrepancy between estimates and actual weight. Specifically examined were the proportion of estimates that fell within 10% of the patients' actual body weights. RESULTS: A total of 372 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 45.7 months, mean body mass index was 17.4, mean weight was 16.8 kg, and 39 participants (18.1%) met the definition for obese. Broselow estimates were within 10% of actual weight 63% of the time, physician estimates were within 10% of the actual weight 43% of the time and hybrid estimates 55% of the time. Based on average mean percent error, compared with actual weight, Broselow differed by 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.7-12), hybrid estimate by 11.3% (95% CI, 10.3-12.2), and physician estimate by 16.2% (95% CI, 14.7-17.7). The Broselow tape was significantly worse than physician estimate for obese patients: 26.4% (95% CI, 19.7-33.1) versus 16.0% (95% CI, 12.3-19.8). CONCLUSION: The Broselow tape generally has greater agreement with actual weight than physician visual estimation, except for obese children. Physician adjustment of the Broselow measurement also proved to be comparable to the Broselow tape.

Ultrasound can accurately guide gastrostomy tube replacement and confirm proper tube placement at the bedside.

BACKGROUND: Malfunctioning or dislodged gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) often require urgent replacement and reinsertion in the Emergency Department (ED). Few data exist regarding the best technique for bedside catheter replacement and verification, and individual operator preferences vary. Although a few reports have described the use of ultrasound guidance during the initial percutaneous insertion, no data are available concerning its role during subsequent G-tube replacements. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the utility of bedside ultrasonography during G-tube replacements in the ED. METHODS: This was a prospective pilot study conducted at a Level 1 Trauma Center with an annual census of 90,000 patients. Seven adults and three children with malfunctioning G-tubes were enrolled. Three tubes were cracked and leaking, and seven tubes had been dislodged. Under ultrasound, a new G-tube was inserted through the previously fashioned tract. After insertion, color Doppler was applied over the catheter tip to enhance visualization during gentle tube oscillation. RESULTS: Ultrasound successfully visualized G-tube replacement in all 10 patients. Application of color Doppler over the G-tube tip during catheter oscillation enhanced placement confirmation. Sonographic findings were corroborated with gastric content aspiration, contrast-enhanced radiographs, and successful use of the new G-tubes. No false tracts were identified during ultrasound-guided insertion, post-procedure sonographic confirmation, or subsequent radiographs. CONCLUSION: The improper replacement of a G-tube can lead to devastating consequences. Verifying appropriate placement through aspirate evaluation can be misleading, and post-procedure radiographs increase radiation exposure and ED wait times. Bedside ultrasonography can be used to guide catheter insertion while providing a safe and quick adjunct to confirm proper G-tube placement.