Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0304603, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38870196

ABSTRACT

Iatrogenic transmission of prions, the infectious agents of fatal Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, through inefficiently decontaminated medical instruments remains a critical issue. Harsh chemical treatments are effective, but not suited for routine reprocessing of reusable surgical instruments in medical cleaning and disinfection processes due to material incompatibilities. The identification of mild detergents with activity against prions is therefore of high interest but laborious due to the low throughput of traditional assays measuring prion infectivity. Here, we report the establishment of TESSA (sTainlESs steel-bead Seed Amplification assay), a modified real-time quaking induced cyclic amplification (RT-QuIC) assay that explores the propagation activity of prions with stainless steel beads. TESSA was applied for the screening of about 70 different commercially available and novel formulations and conditions for their prion inactivation efficacy. One hypochlorite-based formulation, two commercially available alkaline formulations and a manual alkaline pre-cleaner were found to be highly effective in inactivating prions under conditions simulating automated washer-disinfector cleaning processes. The efficacy of these formulations was confirmed in vivo in a murine prion infectivity bioassay, yielding a reduction of the prion titer for bead surface adsorbed prions below detectability. Our data suggest that TESSA represents an effective method for a rapid screening of prion-inactivating detergents, and that alkaline and oxidative formulations are promising in reducing the risk of potential iatrogenic prion transmission through insufficiently decontaminated instrument surfaces.


Subject(s)
Prions , Stainless Steel , Surgical Instruments , Animals , Mice , Stainless Steel/chemistry , Decontamination/methods , Creutzfeldt-Jakob Syndrome/transmission , Creutzfeldt-Jakob Syndrome/prevention & control , Disinfection/methods , Detergents/chemistry , Detergents/pharmacology , Humans , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Oxidation-Reduction
2.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 60(6): 3647-52, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27044552

ABSTRACT

Efficient removal of biofilms from medical devices is a big challenge in health care to avoid hospital-acquired infections, especially from delicate devices like flexible endoscopes, which cannot be reprocessed using harsh chemicals or high temperatures. Therefore, milder solutions such as enzymatic cleaners have to be used, which need to be carefully developed to ensure efficacious performance. In vitro biofilm in a 96-well-plate system was used to select and optimize the formulation of novel enzymatic cleaners. Removal of the biofilm was quantified by crystal violet staining, while the disinfecting properties were evaluated by a BacTiter-Glo assay. The biofilm removal efficacy of the selected cleaner was further tested by using European standard (EN) for endoscope cleaning EN ISO 15883, and removal of artificial blood soil was investigated by treating TOSI (Test Object Surgical Instrument) cleaning indicators. Using the process described here, a novel enzymatic endoscope cleaner was developed, which removed 95% of Staphylococcus aureus and 90% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in the 96-well plate system. With a >99% reduction of CFU and a >90% reduction of extracellular polymeric substances, this cleaner enabled subsequent complete disinfection and fulfilled acceptance criteria of EN ISO 15883. Furthermore, it efficiently removed blood soil and significantly outperformed comparable commercial products. The cleaning performance was stable even after storage of the cleaner for 6 months. It was demonstrated that incorporation of appropriate enzymes into the cleaner enhanced performance significantly.


Subject(s)
Biofilms/drug effects , Deoxyribonucleases/pharmacology , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Lipase/pharmacology , Peptide Hydrolases/pharmacology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/drug effects , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Biofilms/growth & development , Colony Count, Microbial , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Deoxyribonucleases/chemistry , Detergents/chemistry , Detergents/pharmacology , Disinfectants/chemistry , Disinfection , Endoscopes/microbiology , Equipment Contamination , Humans , Lipase/chemistry , Peptide Hydrolases/chemistry , Polysaccharides/chemistry , Polysaccharides/pharmacology , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/physiology , Staphylococcus aureus/physiology
3.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ; 100(9): 4135-45, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26923144

ABSTRACT

Various methods have been reported to quantify total biofilm or different components of biofilm; however, these methods are often confusedly used, leading to discrepancies and misleading results. In this study, different methods for quantification of biofilm, including those for total biomass, total amount of bacterial cells, viable cell number, and amount of extracellular polymeric substances, were systematically compared in microtiter plates. To evaluate which method is suitable for assessment of biofilm removal and for bacterial killing, biofilm samples were treated with various cleaners possessing removing and/or killing capacities. It was found that most of the methods tested in this study in general exhibited high reproducibility and repeatability. Crystal Violet staining was a simple but reliable method for total biomass quantification. Total bacteria cell numbers could be reliably quantified by the fluorescent DNA-binding dye Acridine Orange. Viable cells could be quantified by either an ATP-based assay or a proliferation assay. Both of these viability methods showed a broad detection range and led to precise measurement. For quantification of proteins in the biofilm, staining with fluorescein isothiocyanate was most suitable. Furthermore, it was revealed that a combination of different methods is required to determine if a cleaner kills or removes biofilm.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/drug effects , Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Biofilms/drug effects , Disinfection/methods , Bacterial Load , Biomass , Microbial Viability/drug effects , Reproducibility of Results
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...