How to not miss alveolar echinococcosis in hepatic lesions suspicious for cholangiocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Hepatic alveolar echinococcosis (AE) resembles intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) on radiological imaging. The purpose of this study was to identify criteria to discriminate AE from ICC with CT and MR Imaging. METHODS: One hundred and sixteen imaging studies of 94 patients (CT n = 65; MRI n = 51) diagnosed with AE (n = 55) or ICC (n = 39) were retrospectively reviewed by two blinded radiologists for lesion features including enhancement pattern and matrix composition. A consensus read was conducted in cases of disagreement. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression with bootstrapping were used for analysis. RESULTS: Using CT, no or septal enhancement and calcification yielded the highest values of sensitivity/specificity (90.9%/90.6% and 81.8%/96.9%) for AE. Using MRI, no or septal enhancement and cystic components achieved the highest sensitivity/specificity (90.9%/100.0% and 84.8%/66.7%) for AE. Multivariate logistic regression identified the following strong independent predictors for AE: for MRI, no or septal enhancement (odds ratio [OR] 322.4; p < 0.001); for CT, no or septal enhancement and calcification (OR 35.9 and 42.5; p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). No or septal enhancement and calcification demonstrated the highest interreader agreement (>90%). CONCLUSION: Enhancement characteristics and matrix calcifications offer the strongest discriminating potential between AE and ICC with a high sensitivity, specificity, and interreader agreement.

Assessment of data quality of and staff satisfaction with an electronic health record system in a developing country (Uganda): a qualitative and quantitative comparative study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess if electronic health record systems in developing countries can improve on timeliness, availability and accuracy of routine health reports and staff satisfaction after introducing the electronic system, compared to the paper-based alternative. METHODS: The research was conducted with hospital staff of Tororo District Hospital in Uganda. A comparative intervention study with qualitative and quantitative methods was used to compare the paper-based (pre-test) to the electronic system (post-test) focusing on accuracy, availability and timeliness of monthly routine reports about mothers visiting the hospital; and staff satisfaction with the electronic system as outcome measures. RESULTS: Timeliness: pre-test 13 of 19 months delivered to the district timely, delivery dates for six months could not be established; post-test 100%. AVAILABILITY: pre-test 79% of reports were present at the district health office; post-test 100%. Accuracy: pre-test 73.2% of selected reports could be independently confirmed as correct; post-test 71.2%. Difficulties were encountered in finding enough mothers through direct follow up to inquire on accuracy of information recorded about them. Staff interviews showed that the electronic system is appreciated by the majority of the hospital staff. Remaining obstacles include staff workload, power shortages, network breakdowns and parallel data entry (paper-based and electronic). CONCLUSION: While timeliness and availability improved, improvement of accuracy could not be established. Better approaches to ascertaining accuracy have to be devised, e.g. evaluation of intended use. For success, organizational, managerial and social challenges must be addressed beyond technical aspects.