Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 36(4): 557-564, 2023 08 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37321658

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine lung cancer screening eligibility, knowledge, and interest and to quantify the effect of the expanded 2021 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria among women presenting for screening mammography, a group with demonstrable interest in cancer screening. METHODS: A single-page survey was distributed to patients presenting for screening mammography, from January-March 2020 and June 2020-January 2021, at 2 academic medical centers on the East and West Coasts. The population served by the East Coast institution has greater poverty, greater ethnic/racial diversity, and lower education levels. Survey questions included age, smoking history, lung cancer screening knowledge, participation, and interest. Lung cancer screening eligibility was determined for both 2013 and 2021 USPSTF guidelines. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and data were compared between groups using the Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney nonparametric test, and the 2-sample t test. RESULTS: 5512 surveys were completed; 33% (1824) of women reported a history of smoking-30% (1656) former smokers and 3% (156) current smokers. Among women with a smoking history, 7% (127/1824) were eligible for lung cancer screening using 2013% and 11% (207/1824) using the 2021 USPSTF criteria. Interest in lung cancer screening was high (73%; 151/207) among eligible women using 2021 USPSTF criteria, but only 42% (87/207) had heard of lung cancer screening and only 28% (57/207) had received prior LDCT screening. CONCLUSION: Eligible screening mammography patients reported high levels of interest in lung cancer screening but low levels of knowledge and participation. Linking mammography and LDCT appointments may improve lung cancer screening participation.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Early Detection of Cancer , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Mammography , Smoking/epidemiology , Mass Screening
2.
Emerg Radiol ; 22(1): 19-24, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24939821

ABSTRACT

This work was conducted to determine whether non-contrast-enhanced CT (NECT) of patients with suspected acute aortic syndrome (AAS) can identify patients with a very low likelihood of a positive diagnosis. In the derivation phase, patients who received both NECT and contrast-enhanced CT angiography (CTA) for suspected AAS were identified. Two readers blinded to CTA results analyzed NECTs from AAS positive and negative cases, recording maximal aortic diameters and qualitative findings of aortic disease. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent positive predictors for AAS; those predictors were then used to create a decision rule. For the validation phase, NECTs from patients evaluated for AAS at a second institution were reviewed by two independent readers who recorded the presence of decision rule predictors while blinded to CTA results. In the derivation phase, 34 CTA positive and 83 CTA negative cases were reviewed. Measurements of aortic diameter alone achieved mean sensitivity and specificity of 82 % and of 83 %, respectively. Logistic regression identified aortic diameter, displaced calcifications, high attenuation aortic wall and abnormal aortic contour as independent predictors of AAS. The decision rule incorporating these findings achieved higher mean sensitivity (93 %), negative predictive value (96 %), and moderate reader agreement (kappa = 0.59). For the validation phase, application of the decision rule to 35 AAS positive and 45 AAS negative cases at the second institution yielded sensitivity of 100 % and specificity of 74 % for both readers. NECT can identify patients with a very low likelihood of AAS and potentially mitigate the urgency of performing CTA.


Subject(s)
Aortic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Triage , Acute Disease , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Contrast Media , Decision Support Techniques , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Iohexol/analogs & derivatives , Iopamidol , Middle Aged , Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Syndrome , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentation
3.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 200(4): 805-11, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23521452

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to assess the diagnostic performance of the unenhanced and contrast-enhanced phases separately in patients imaged with CT for suspected acute aortic syndromes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All adults (n = 2868) presenting to our emergency department from January 1, 2006, through August 1, 2010, who underwent unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT of the chest and abdomen for suspected acute aortic syndrome were retrospectively identified. Forty-five patients with acute aortic syndrome and 45 healthy control subjects comprised the study population (55 women; mean age, 61 ± 16 years). Unenhanced followed by contrast-enhanced CT angiography (CTA) images were reviewed. Contrast-enhanced CTA examinations of case patients and control subjects with isolated intramural hematoma were reviewed. Radiation exposure was estimated by CT dose-length product. RESULTS: Forty-five patients had one or more CT findings of acute aortic syndrome: aortic dissection (n = 32), intramural hematoma (n = 27), aortic rupture (n = 10), impending rupture (n = 4), and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer (n = 2). Unenhanced CT was 89% (40/45) sensitive and 100% (45/45) specific for acute aortic syndrome. Unenhanced CT was 94% (17/18) and 71% (10/14) sensitive for type A and type B dissection, respectively (p = 0.142). Contrast-enhanced CTA was 100% (8/8) sensitive for isolated intramural hematoma. Mean radiation effective dose was 43 ± 20 mSv. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced CT performed well in detection of acute aortic syndrome treated surgically, although its performance does not support its use in place of contrast-enhanced CTA. Unenhanced CT may be a reasonable first examination for rapid triage when IV contrast is contraindicated. Contrast-enhanced CTA was highly sensitive for intramural hematoma, suggesting that unenhanced imaging may not always be needed. Acute aortic syndrome imaging protocols should be optimized to reduce radiation dose.


Subject(s)
Aortic Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Aortography/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Acute Disease , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Chi-Square Distribution , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Iohexol/analogs & derivatives , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Radiation Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Statistics, Nonparametric , Syndrome , Triiodobenzoic Acids
4.
J Radiol Case Rep ; 7(12): 21-5, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24421934

ABSTRACT

Gallbladder torsion is a rare cause of acute gangrenous cholecystitis; its occurrence within an abdominal hernia has not been previously reported. We present such a case occurring within a parastomal hernia and imaged with unenhanced CT.


Subject(s)
Gallbladder Diseases/complications , Gallbladder/pathology , Hernia, Ventral/complications , Torsion Abnormality/complications , Aged , Cholecystitis/diagnostic imaging , Cholecystitis/etiology , Gallbladder Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Gangrene/diagnostic imaging , Gangrene/etiology , Hernia, Ventral/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Torsion Abnormality/diagnostic imaging
5.
Radiology ; 260(3): 825-30, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21555353

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare neoplastic and nonneoplastic disease in the anterior extradural space (AES) with regard to the contour of the disease and the tethering of the central septum, as seen on axial magnetic resonance (MR) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this institutional review board-approved HIPAA-compliant study, the data of patients who had AES disease determined at MR imaging and underwent diagnostic biopsy were studied. Two blinded observers reviewed the MR images and assigned the patients to one of two groups on the basis of the contour of AES disease: those with a centrally convex disease contour posteriorly and those whose disease contour was tethered in the midline to the posterior aspect of the vertebral body. Biopsy results served as the standard of reference. The two-tailed Fisher exact test, the Breslow-Day test, and κ statistics were used to compare groups. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the midline tethered contour of AES disease for the detection of neoplasm were calculated. RESULTS: The data of 32 patients (16 men, 16 women; mean age, 68 years) were studied. Seventeen patients had malignant epidural disease. Fifteen patients had nonneoplastic epidural disease: Six patients had hematomas, and nine had abscesses. A greater proportion of AES neoplasms (13 [76%] and 14 [82%] of 17 lesions for observers 1 and 2, respectively) than nonneoplastic AES lesions (four [27%] and three [20%] of 15 lesions for observers 1 and 2, respectively) demonstrated midline tethering of the central septum. For observers 1 and 2, a unilobed or bilobed appearance of AES disease had sensitivities of 76% (13 of 17 lesions) and 82% (14 of 17 lesions), respectively; specificities of 73% (11 of 15 lesions) and 80% (12 of 15 lesions), respectively; and accuracies of 75% (24 of 32 lesions) and 81% (26 of 32 lesions), respectively, for the detection of neoplasm. The mean κ value for interobserver variability was 0.62 (95% confidence interval: 0.35, 0.90). CONCLUSION: AES disease preserving the midline tethering of the central septum is more common with neoplastic disease than with infections or hematomas.


Subject(s)
Epidural Neoplasms/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diagnosis, Differential , Epidural Space/pathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
Vascular ; 16(4): 213-8, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18845102

ABSTRACT

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. Patients with massive PE have a high mortality rate, with two of every three deaths occurring in the first hour. The mainstay of treatment for PE is anticoagulation. However, when the patient is in extremis, intravenous lysis of the clot is indicated. Recently, mechanical fragmentation with or without pharmacologic thrombolysis has been shown to have a role in therapy for patients with massive PE, as well as in those patients who have a contraindication to anticoagulation. We discuss our experience with mechanical fragmentation in the treatment of PE and review the literature.


Subject(s)
Postoperative Complications/therapy , Pulmonary Embolism/therapy , Venous Thrombosis/therapy , Adult , Aged , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Catheterization, Swan-Ganz/methods , Coronary Angiography , Female , Heparin/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic/therapy , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/mortality , Thrombolytic Therapy/methods , Treatment Outcome , United States , Venous Thrombosis/complications , Venous Thrombosis/diagnostic imaging
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...