Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
1.
Front Pediatr ; 10: 935483, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36034546

ABSTRACT

Background: Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) during the COVID-19 pandemic aimed at prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission also influenced transmission of viruses other than SARS-CoV-2. The aim of this study was to describe and compare the burden of common viral respiratory and gastrointestinal infections in children admitted to Berlin University Children's Hospital (BCH) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic at different levels of public NPI measures. Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed the frequency of detection of common human respiratory and gastrointestinal viruses from January 2016 through January 2022 in all patients admitted to BCH. We compared virus detection before and during the COVID-19 pandemic at different levels of public NPI measures. Results: The frequency of detection of seasonal enveloped and non-enveloped viruses [Boca-, Corona-, Influenza-, Metapneumo-, Parainfluenza-, Rota-, and Respiratory Syncytial Viruses (RSV)] was diminished during the COVID-19 pandemic, whereas detection rates of non-seasonal viruses (Rhino-/Entero-, and Adenoviruses) were stable during the pandemic. After withdrawal of major NPI measures, we observed an out of season surge of the detection rates of Boca-, Corona-, Parainfluenzaviruses, and RSV. In contrast, no increased detection frequency was observed for Influenza-, Metapneumo-, and Rotaviruses as of January 2022. Conclusion: Corona-, Boca-, Parainfluenzaviruses, and RSV returned as frequently detected pathogens after withdrawal of major NPI measures. The out of season rise might be attributed to an "immune-debt" due to missing contact to viral antigens resulting in waning of population immunity during the COVID-19 pandemic.

2.
Blood Purif ; 49(1-2): 55-62, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31527371

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acute and acute on chronic liver failure are life-threatening conditions, and bridging to transplantation is complicated by a paucity of suitable organs for children. While different modalities of extracorporeal liver support exist, their use in children is complicated by a large extracorporeal volume, and data on their use in children is limited. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of single-pass albumin dialysis (SPAD) in children with liver failure. METHODS: Retrospective medical chart review of pediatric patients with liver failure treated with SPAD. The decrease in hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and the serum levels of bilirubin and ammonia were measured to determine efficacy. Adverse events were documented to assess safety. RESULTS: Nineteen pediatric patients with a median age of 25.5 months and a median body weight of 11.9 kg were treated with SPAD between January 2011 and March 2018. Total bilirubin (p < 0.001) and ammonia (p = 0.02) significantly decreased after treatment with SPAD. As clinical outcome parameter, HE significantly improved (p = 0.001). Twelve patients were bridged successfully to liver transplantation. In all patients, 71 SPAD sessions were run. Clotting in the dialysis circuit was observed in 49% of all sessions. Heparin and citrate were used for anticoagulation and were significantly superior to dialysis without any anticoagulation (p= 0.03). Transfusion of packed blood cells (57%) and catecholamine therapy (49%) were frequently necessary. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with SPAD was effective in detoxification, as measured by significant improvement of HE and clearance from surrogate laboratory parameters.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Citric Acid/administration & dosage , Heparin/administration & dosage , Hepatic Encephalopathy/therapy , Liver Failure/therapy , Serum Albumin, Human , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hepatic Encephalopathy/blood , Humans , Infant , Liver Failure/blood , Liver Transplantation , Male , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 8(4): 1341-1348.e5, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31846795

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hen's egg is one of the commonest causes of food allergy, but there are little data on its risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk factors, particularly eczema, for hen's egg allergy in the EuroPrevall birth cohort. METHODS: In the pan-European EuroPrevall birth cohort, questionnaires were undertaken at 12 and 24 months or when parents reported symptoms. Children with suspected egg allergy were invited for skin prick testing, specific IgE assessment, and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) as indicated. Each egg allergy case (positive DBPCFC or egg-induced anaphylaxis) was allocated up to 2 age- and country-matched controls. RESULTS: A total of 12,049 infants were recruited into the EuroPrevall birth cohort, and 9,336 (77.5%) were followed until 2 years. A total of 86 infants had egg allergy (84 by DBPCFC) and were matched with 140 controls. Independently associated with egg allergy were past/current eczema (adjusted odds ratio, 9.21; 95% CI, 2.65-32.04), Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (1.54 per 5 units; 1.28-1.86), antibiotics in the first week of life (6.17; 1.42-26.89), and current rhinitis (3.02; 1.04-8.78). Increasing eczema severity was associated with an increasing likelihood of egg allergy. Eczema was reported to have started 3.6 (SE, 0.5) months before egg allergy. Age of introduction of egg into the diet was not associated with egg allergy. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to peanut allergy, eczema was strongly associated with egg allergy development and the association increased with increasing eczema severity. The age of introduction of dietary egg was not a risk factor. The potential role of antibiotics in early life as a risk factor for egg allergy needs further examination.


Subject(s)
Egg Hypersensitivity , Food Hypersensitivity , Animals , Chickens , Child, Preschool , Egg Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Egg Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Eggs , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant , Risk Factors
4.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract ; 7(2): 479-491.e10, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30423449

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Only 2 small placebo-controlled trials on peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) have been published. OBJECTIVE: We examined the efficacy, safety, immunologic parameters, quality of life (QOL), and burden of treatment (BOT) of low-dose peanut OIT in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: A total of 62 children aged 3 to 17 years with IgE-mediated, challenge-proven peanut allergy were randomized (1:1) to receive peanut OIT with a maintenance dose of 125 to 250 mg peanut protein or placebo. The primary outcome was the proportion of children tolerating 300 mg or more peanut protein at oral food challenge (OFC) after 16 months of OIT. We measured the occurrence of adverse events (AEs), immunologic changes, and QOL before and after OIT and BOT during OIT. RESULTS: Twenty-three of 31 (74.2%) children of the active group tolerated at least 300 mg peanut protein at final OFC compared with 5 of 31 (16.1%) in the placebo group (P < .001). Thirteen of 31 (41.9%) children of the active versus 1 of 31 (3.2%) of the placebo group tolerated the highest dose of 4.5 g peanut protein at final OFC (P < .001). There was no significant difference between the groups in the occurrence of AE-related dropouts or in the number, severity, and treatment of objective AEs. In the peanut-OIT group, we noted a significant reduction in peanut-specific IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-2 production by PBMCs compared with the placebo group, as well as a significant increase in peanut-specific IgG4 levels and a significant improvement in QOL; 86% of children evaluated the BOT positively. DISCUSSION: Low-dose OIT is a promising, effective, and safe treatment option for peanut-allergic children, leading to improvement in QOL, a low BOT, and immunologic changes showing tolerance development.


Subject(s)
Allergens/administration & dosage , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Peanut Hypersensitivity/therapy , Quality of Life , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome
5.
Pediatr Allergy Immunol ; 29(1): 58-65, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28986924

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Blinded food challenges are considered the current gold standard for the diagnosis of food allergies. We used data from a pan-European multicenter project to assess differences between study centers, aiming to identify the impact of subjective aspects for the interpretation of oral food challenges. METHODS: Nine study centers of the EuroPrevall birth cohort study about food allergy recruited 12 049 newborns and followed them for up to 30 months in regular intervals. Intensive training was conducted and every center visited to ensure similar handling of the protocols. Suspected food allergy was clinically evaluated by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges using a nine dose escalation protocol. The primary challenge outcomes based on physician's appraisal were compared to documented signs and symptoms. RESULTS: Of 839 challenges conducted, study centers confirmed food allergy in 15.6% to 53.6% of locally conducted challenges. Centers reported 0 to 16 positive placebo challenges. Worsening of eczema was the most common sign when challenged with placebo. Agreement between documented objective signs and the challenge outcome assigned by the physician was heterogeneous, with Cohen's kappa spanning from 0.42 to 0.84. CONCLUSIONS: These differences suggest that the comparison of food challenge outcomes between centers is difficult despite common protocols and training. We recommend detailed symptom assessment and documentation as well as objective sign-based challenge outcome algorithms to assure accuracy and comparability of blinded food challenges. Training and supervision of staff conducting food challenges is a mandatory component of reliable outcome data.


Subject(s)
Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Skin Tests/methods , Allergens/immunology , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Double-Blind Method , Europe , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Observer Variation
7.
Int Arch Allergy Immunol ; 157(3): 238-45, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22042002

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy is a frequent and potentially life-threatening food allergy. Despite the large taxonomic distance between the plants, peanut-allergic patients often react to tree nuts such as walnuts. While the allergens of peanut and walnut have a high degree of homology in their amino-acid sequences, it is unknown whether this similarity is responsible for the observed co-reactivity. Therefore, we analyzed the binding of specific IgE antibodies to sequential epitopes of peanut and walnut in peanut-allergic patients with and without walnut allergy. METHODS: The IgE binding to previously described sequential epitopes of peanut and the homologous regions of walnut was assessed in 32 peanut-allergic patients using a peptide microarray technology. Twelve patients had a clinically relevant walnut allergy and 20 were tolerant to walnut. Inhibition assays with peanut peptides and corresponding walnut sequences were performed to show specific binding to sequential epitopes. RESULTS: No differences in the recognition of sequential epitopes could be found between peanut-allergic patients with or without walnut allergy. Only a few patients showed IgE binding to walnut sequences that corresponded to sequential epitopes of peanut. In the inhibition assays, no relevant cross-reacting IgE antibodies could be detected for the peptides analyzed. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that although they share a rather high degree of homology with the corresponding regions of walnut allergens, the sequence stretches previously identified as sequential IgE binding epitopes of Ara h 1, Ara h 2 and Ara h 3 have no IgE binding equivalents in walnut allergens.


Subject(s)
Allergens/immunology , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Epitopes/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Juglans/immunology , Nut Hypersensitivity/immunology , Peanut Hypersensitivity/immunology , 2S Albumins, Plant/chemistry , 2S Albumins, Plant/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Allergens/chemistry , Antigens, Plant/chemistry , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Epitope Mapping , Epitopes/chemistry , Glycoproteins/chemistry , Glycoproteins/immunology , Humans , Membrane Proteins , Nut Hypersensitivity/complications , Peanut Hypersensitivity/complications , Plant Proteins/chemistry , Plant Proteins/immunology , Protein Array Analysis , Young Adult
8.
In. White, Kerr L; Frenk, Julio; Ordoñez, Cosme; Paganini, José Maria; Starfield, Bárbara. Investigaciónes sobre servicios de salud: una antología. Washington, D.C, Organización Panamericana de la Salud, 1992. p.117-126, tab. (OPS. Publicación Científica, 534).
Monography in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-370699
9.
In. White, Kerr L; Frenk, Julio; Ordoñez Carceller, Cosme; Paganini, José Maria; Starfield, Bárbara. Health services research: An anthology. Washington, D.C, Pan Américan Health Organization, 1992. p.107-115, tab. (PAHO. Scientific Públication, 534).
Monography in English | LILACS | ID: lil-370936
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...