Risk of PTSD Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic Among Patients in Opioid Substitution Treatment.

Background: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of patients suffering from addictive disorders is of major concern. This study aimed to explore the presence and potential increase in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, depression, and anxiety since the beginning of the pandemic for patients in opioid substitution therapy (OST). Methods: This cross-sectional survey study evaluated a clinical sample of patients in OST (N = 123). Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to the COVID-19 pandemic were assessed by an adapted version of the impact of event scale (IES-R), resulting in two subgroups of low and high risk for PTSD. The depression, anxiety, and stress scale (DASS-21) was applied to collect data on the respective symptoms, and changes since the onset of the pandemic were reported on separate scales. Sociodemographic and COVID-19 related factors, as well as data on craving, consumption patterns, concomitant use, and the drug market were further assessed. Results: A binary logistic regression analysis confirmed the impact of self-perceived higher burden by psychological and economic factors on the elevated risk for PTSD due to the pandemic. The high-risk PTSD group also showed higher levels of depression, anxiety and stress, as well as a more pronounced deterioration in these symptoms since the pandemic. While reported levels of craving did not differ between the two groups, the high-risk PTSD group indicated a significantly higher increase in craving since the crisis, when compared to the low-risk group. Discussion: Our findings demonstrate elevated levels of clinical symptoms among patients in OST, with more than a quarter of patients found at risk for PTSD due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, about 30-50% of our patients reported concerning levels of depression, anxiety, or stress. Special attention should be drawn to these findings, and potential deterioration of the situation should be addressed by health care facilities. Particularly, psychological, and financial burden due to the crisis were identified as factors increasing the risk for PTSD. These factors can easily be evaluated during routine anamneses, and might be a valuable source of information, when special attention is needed.

Developments in Drug Addiction During COVID-19-An Austrian Perspective Based on a Clinical Sample.

Concerns about the negative consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with substance use disorder (SUD) were raised by experts in the field around the world. Here we provide an Austrian perspective, discussing the impact of the pandemic on help-seeking patient with drug use disorder during the initial stage of the pandemic. Our perspectives are based on the situation as perceived at our clinical facility, and supported by original data collected from a small clinical sample of patients with drug use disorder (N = 32). The viewpoints and related descriptive data include the perceived individual impact of COVID-19, as well as various aspects of drug use behavior and the Austrian drug market before and after the onset of the pandemic. The consequences for a subgroup of patients in opioid substitution treatment (N = 24) are discussed. Surprisingly and in contrast to anticipated developments, we had the impression of a rather stable situation in Austria, at least at this early stage of the pandemic. The immediate impact of COVID-19 on these help-seeking patients with high levels of drug dependency seemed less severe than anticipated so far. Importantly, this observation might be a short-term effect for this already fragile group and careful monitoring of further developments as well as preparation of long-term strategies are advised. In general, problematic drug use is associated with many health risk factors and finding appropriate long-term health care strategies has to remain a top priority facing the pandemic. Our perspectives are restricted to observations from help-seeking patients at our clinic, and no conclusions for the general population can be directly drawn.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients With Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Risk Factors for Relapse.

Background: The impact of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on vulnerable groups like patients suffering from substance use disorders is expected to be tremendous, and corresponding concerns were raised early on by many experts around the world. Psychosocial distress, financial insecurities and physiological problems associated with the COVID-19 crisis could be especially challenging for this group of patients. Methods: In the current study data was collected from a clinical sample of patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD; N = 127) during the initial stage of the pandemic. The impact of various COVID-19 related factors (physiological, psychosocial, economic and others) on patients' personal life was evaluated. Alcohol consumption, craving, and potential posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms were assessed using different scales and their associations were analyzed. Furthermore, differences regarding these variables between comparably sized groups of patients who remained abstinent (N = 37), relapsed (N = 41), or reported unaltered drinking behavior (consuming subgroup, N = 49) were investigated. The impact of sociodemographic and COVID-19 factors on relapse (in comparison to abstinence) was evaluated using binary logistic regression analysis. Results: Our results confirmed the expected positive associations between alcohol consumption, craving, and PTSD symptoms, respectively, among patients with AUD. Furthermore, group differences indicate significantly lower levels on all three scales for abstinent patients. Although generally low PTSD scores were observed, 8% of our participants were found to be at risk of PTSD. Results of a binary logistic regression analysis indicated the presence of psychosocial COVID-19 factors (e.g., isolation, anxiety, and depression) as well as living alone as two major risk factors for relapse. Discussion: Our findings based on actual patient data support the anticipated negative consequences of the pandemic on persons with AUD. Crucially, our results regarding relapse emphasized psychosocial COVID-19 factors and isolation as especially challenging circumstances for persons with AUD, whereas economic and physiological health aspects seemed of minor impact on relapse. Our results reflect the initial stage of the pandemic, whereas long-term developments should be closely monitored.

Neurobiological processes during the Cambridge gambling task.

Although vast research has been conducted concerning gambling behavior this is the first study combining behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data while using the Cambridge Gambling Task (CGT). We tested 20 healthy right-handed men and chose an event-related design to allow for precise temporal separation of gambling stages. In the color decision stage participants had to guess whether a yellow token was hidden behind red or blue boxes presented in varying color ratios, then stake wagers during the bet decision stage. In the final stage the outcome (won or lost) was presented. Analyzing the blood-oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrasts in the decision stages we found increases of activation in brain areas involved in decision making, working memory and learning, when participants bet on the majority choice. During the outcome stage increased brain activation was found in parts of the reward system and areas involved in decision making and impulse control, when winning. When losing, activation increased in areas involved in risk aversion and management of uncertainties. When participants lost unexpectedly (i.e. lost although they bet on the majority), increased activation was found in the insula, compared to winning expectedly. The more unexpectedly participants won the higher the increase of brain activation in parts of the reward system and areas involved in executive functions. Our study gives an extensive overview of brain areas involved in different stages of gambling and during various outcomes, with corresponding behavioral data (e.g. speed and quality of decision making) illustrating underlying tendencies.

Treatment Duration With Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics After In-hospital Initiation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are recommended especially for patients with multiple admissions and poor adherence. The empirical basis of this strategy is a matter of debate. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study extending over 6 years, all patients admitted for inpatient treatment with a diagnosis of psychotic disorders according to International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (F2) were screened for treatment episodes with a new start of an LAI. Indication for LAI treatment was based primarily on previous medication default. All-cause discontinuation was used as a measure of treatment efficiency. Patients with early dropout (termination of LAI treatment within 6 months) were compared with patients with longer treatment (treatment >6 months) for sociodemographic and treatment variables using bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: A total of 194 treatment episodes with new start of LAIs were identified. Almost one half dropped out within 6 months (early dropout: n = 95 [49%]; mean duration, 2.2 months). Termination of treatment was mainly due to patients' refusal to continue. However, almost a third of patients (61; 31.4%) had a treatment duration of more than 2 years. In a multivariate Cox regression model, longer treatment duration was associated with older age (P = 0.05), not being single (P = 0.04), fewer admissions during the year preceding the index episode (P = 0.02), and better ratings for adherence at the index episode (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: There are both more patients than expected leaving the treatment early and more patients than expected staying for long periods, even among patients with a history of poor adherence.

[Between faith and delusion]. / Zwischen Glauben und Wahn.

Religious beliefs can lead to difficulties in psychiatric diagnosis, when it comes to distinguishing between faith and delusion. Delusion is defined as a false assessment of reality combined with subjective certainty, which is in contrast with the reality of the social environment. The problem with this definition is that reality cannot be examined with scientific methods/criteria and that the assessment of reality itself underlies historical and cultural fluctuations. The current diagnostic manuals for psychiatric disorders DSM 5 and ICD-10 require, that the content of the belief has to be inadequate even in the subculture of the patient (ICD-10) and that the cultural and socioeconomic background of the patient has to be taken into account (DSM 5). On the basis of this case-report and of selected publications on this topic we want to discuss this diagnostic problem. After that we present a diagnostic model for delusion, which is easy to handle in the daily routine of psychiatrists.