Standard prophylactic versus intermediate dose enoxaparin in adults with severe COVID-19: A multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with coagulopathy but the optimal prophylactic anticoagulation therapy remains uncertain and may depend on COVID-19 severity. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes in hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19 treated with standard prophylactic versus intermediate dose enoxaparin. METHODS: We conducted a multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing standard prophylactic dose versus intermediate dose enoxaparin in adults who were hospitalized with COVID-19 and admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) and/or had laboratory evidence of coagulopathy. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive standard prophylactic dose enoxaparin or intermediate weight-adjusted dose enoxaparin. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included arterial or venous thromboembolism and major bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients (99 males and 77 females) underwent randomization. In the intention-to-treat population, all-cause mortality at 30 days was 15% for intermediate dose enoxaparin and 21% for standard prophylactic dose enoxaparin (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-1.45; P = .31 by Chi-square test). Unadjusted Cox proportional hazards modeling demonstrated no significant difference in mortality between intermediate and standard dose enoxaparin (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-1.37; P = .28). Arterial or venous thrombosis occurred in 13% of patients assigned to intermediate dose enoxaparin and 9% of patients assigned to standard dose enoxaparin. Major bleeding occurred in 2% of patients in each arm. CONCLUSION: In hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19, standard prophylactic dose and intermediate dose enoxaparin did not differ significantly in preventing death or thrombosis at 30 days.

Relationships between chemotherapy, chemotherapy dose intensity and outcomes of follicular lymphoma in the immunochemotherapy era: a report from the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellence Molecular Epidemiology Resource.

The optimal treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) is not established. Rituximab's value potentially dilutes the impact of chemotherapy on FL. We reviewed 337 cases of FL treated initially with rituximab as monotherapy or with chemotherapy at the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic from 2002 to 2009, investigating the association between chemotherapy delivery of cyclophosphamide or doxorubicin and survival. With median follow-up duration of 52.7 months, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar between the two groups, with a trend toward better EFS in the R-chemotherapy cohort (hazard ratio [HR]=1.24, p=0.28). In the R-chemotherapy group, increased total dose delivery and delivered dose intensity of doxorubicin were associated with improved EFS only in patients who did not receive R-maintenance (HR=0.81; p=0.02 and HR=0.94; p=0.04). Cyclophosphamide delivery was not associated with EFS. Thus, in the immunochemotherapy era, chemotherapy delivery strategy requires re-evaluation.

Morbidity and mortality following elective splenectomy for benign and malignant hematologic conditions: analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.

IMPORTANCE: Splenectomy is a commonly performed operation; however, data from large series regarding operative outcomes to help guide decision making and informed consent are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical and pathologic variables associated with morbidity and mortality following elective splenectomy for benign and malignant hematologic conditions in the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data for elective splenectomy between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2011, was performed, and 1715 eligible individuals were identified. INTERVENTION: Elective splenectomy for hematologic conditions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Complications and operative mortality were evaluated for the entire cohort and compared between patients with benign vs malignant diseases. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors predictive of operative complications and death. RESULTS: Splenectomy was performed in 1344 patients (78.4%) for benign disease and in 371 patients (21.6%) for malignant disease. Two hundred ninety-one patients (17.0%) had a complication, and operative mortality occurred in 27 patients (mortality rate, 1.6%). Patients treated for malignant disease had a higher rate of overall complications (27.2%) compared with patients treated for benign disease (14.1%) (P < .001). Several variables were independent predictors of complications, including malignant disease (vs benign) (Odds Ratio [OR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.23-2.80; P = .003), independent performance status (vs dependent) (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.07-1.52; P = .02), and increasing albumin level (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.66-0.86; P < .001). Increasing age (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.00-1.06; P = .05) was an independent predictor of mortality while increasing albumin level (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.86; P = .003) predicted lower risk of operative death. From these data, a patient older than 60 years with a low preoperative albumin level has a predicted probability for operative death as high as 10.0%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Preoperative performance and nutritional status are significant risk factors for complications and mortality following elective splenectomy. Although operative mortality continues to decrease over time, specific preoperative variables may help with patient selection before elective splenectomy for certain patients.

Optimizing chemotherapeutic strategies for peripheral T-cell lymphomas.

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas are a heterogenous mix of histology, as well as clinical presentation, and outcome and remain a challenging group of diseases to treat. Because of difficulty and variability in diagnosis, improvements in diagnostic technology, and changing classification systems over time, the interpretation of studies is complicated. In addition, the response to current treatments and long-term outcome is generally poor. This review outlines these problems and discusses the current status of treatment strategies, including the disappointing results with standard anthracycline-based therapy as well as experience with modifications to CHOP (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone); increasing dose intensity; antimetabolites; and T-cell-targeted therapies. We conclude with a description of a new agent, pralatrexate, including the preclinical and early clinical experience as well as a description of a large phase II prospective trial. Because of the relative rarity of this group of diseases, large-scale prospective clinical trials are difficult to implement. New treatment strategies are needed if we hope to improve patient outcomes.