ABSTRACT
Introducción. En Asia y Europa, el sistema OLGA ha sido útil como marcador de riesgo de cáncer gástrico. Sin embargo, su utilidad en poblaciones de alto riesgo en Colombia aún se desconoce. Objetivo. Establecer si los estadios OLGA se asocian con un mayor riesgo de cáncer y displasia en una población de alto riesgo en Colombia y determinar la capacidad diagnóstica de la escala para evaluar dicho riesgo. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó un estudio multicéntrico con pacientes con cáncer gástrico y displasia (casos), y pacientes con atrofia y metaplasia intestinal (controles), provenientes de tres centros de una zona de alto riesgo de cáncer gástrico en Colombia. Se incluyeron 506 pacientes cuyo estudio endoscópico e histopatológico fue realizado mediante el sistema de Sydney y la estadificación de OLGA propuesta por Rugge. El efecto de cada variable de interés sobre la enfermedad (cáncer gástrico y displasia) se evaluó mediante modelos bivariados y multivariados. Un valor de p menor de 0,05 se consideró estadísticamente significativo. Resultados. Los estadios elevados del sistema OLGA (III-IV) se asociaron con un mayor riesgo de displasia y cáncer gástrico (OR ajustado = 8,71; IC95 % = 5,09-14,9; p=0,001) con una sensibilidad del 54,9 %, especificidad del 89,3 % y una razón de probabilidad positiva de 5,17. Conclusiones. El estadio OLGA es un marcador de riesgo de cáncer gástrico y displasia en la población de estudio. Se recomienda su implementación como estrategia para optimizar el diagnóstico oportuno y el seguimiento de pacientes con mayor riesgo.
Introduction. The OLGA system has been proved to be useful in Asia and Europe as a risk marker of gastric cancer. However, its usefulness in high-risk populations in Colombia is still unknown. Objective. To assess potential associations between the OLGA staging system and an increased risk of gastric cancer and dysplasia in a high-risk Colombian population and to establish diagnostic capacity of the scale to assess the risk. Materials and methods. We carried out a multicenter study including patients with cancer and dysplasia (cases) and patients with atrophy and intestinal metaplasia (controls). A total of 506 patients were recruited from three centers in an area with a high risk population in Colombia. The endoscopic and histopathologic studies were evaluated according to the Sydney system and the OLGA staging system proposed by Rugge. The effect of each variable on the disease (gastric cancer and dysplasia) was evaluated using bivariate and multivariate models. Statistical significance was set considering a p value inferior to 0.05. Results. Advanced stages of the OLGA system (III-IV) were associated with a higher risk of dysplasia and gastric cancer (adjusted OR = 8.71; CI95% = 5.09-14.9; p=0.001), sensitivity=54.9%, specificity=89.3% and positive likelihood ratio=5.17. Conclusions. The OLGA staging system is a risk marker for gastric cancer and dysplasia in the studied population. We recommend its implementation to improve the timely diagnosis and follow-up of patients with the highest cancer risk.
ABSTRACT
Introduction. The OLGA system has been proved to be useful in Asia and Europe as a risk marker of gastric cancer. However, its usefulness in high-risk populations in Colombia is still unknown. Objective. To assess potential associations between the OLGA staging system and an increased risk of gastric cancer and dysplasia in a high-risk Colombian population and to establish diagnostic capacity of the scale to assess the risk. Materials and methods. We carried out a multicenter study including patients with cancer and dysplasia (cases) and patients with atrophy and intestinal metaplasia (controls). A total of 506 patients were recruited from three centers in an area with a high risk population in Colombia. The endoscopic and histopathologic studies were evaluated according to the Sydney system and the OLGA staging system proposed by Rugge. The effect of each variable on the disease (gastric cancer and dysplasia) was evaluated using bivariate and multivariate models. Statistical significance was set considering a p value inferior to 0.05. Results. Advanced stages of the OLGA system (III-IV) were associated with a higher risk of dysplasia and gastric cancer (adjusted OR = 8.71; CI95% = 5.09-14.9; p=0.001), sensitivity=54.9%, specificity=89.3% and positive likelihood ratio=5.17. Conclusions. The OLGA staging system is a risk marker for gastric cancer and dysplasia in the studied population. We recommend its implementation to improve the timely diagnosis and follow-up of patients with the highest cancer risk.
Introducción. En Asia y Europa, el sistema OLGA ha sido útil como marcador de riesgo de cáncer gástrico. Sin embargo, su utilidad en poblaciones de alto riesgo en Colombia aún se desconoce. Objetivo. Establecer si los estadios OLGA se asocian con un mayor riesgo de cáncer y displasia en una población de alto riesgo en Colombia y determinar la capacidad diagnóstica de la escala para evaluar dicho riesgo.Materiales y métodos. Se realizó un estudio multicéntrico con pacientes con cáncer gástrico y displasia (casos), y pacientes con atrofia y metaplasia intestinal (controles), provenientes de tres centros de una zona de alto riesgo de cáncer gástrico en Colombia. Se incluyeron 506 pacientes cuyo estudio endoscópico e histopatológico fue realizado mediante el sistema de Sydney y la estadificación de OLGA propuesta porRugge. El efecto de cada variable de interés sobre la enfermedad (cáncer gástrico y displasia) se evaluó mediante modelos bivariados y multivariados. Un valor de p menor de 0,05 se consideró estadísticamente significativo.Resultados. Los estadios elevados del sistema OLGA (III-IV) se asociaron con un mayor riesgo de displasia y cáncer gástrico (OR ajustado = 8,71; IC95 % = 5,09-14,9; p=0,001) con una sensibilidad del 54,9 %, especificidad del 89,3 % y una razón de probabilidad positiva de 5,17.Conclusiones. El estadio OLGA es un marcador de riesgo de cáncer gástrico y displasia en la población de estudio. Se recomienda su implementación como estrategia para optimizar el diagnóstico oportuno y el seguimiento de pacientes con mayor riesgo.
Subject(s)
Gastritis , Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colombia/epidemiology , Gastritis/complications , Risk Factors , Asia , Metaplasia , Helicobacter Infections/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: El objetivo del estudio fue describir las dinámicas comunitarias y gubernamentales en torno a la malaria, su control y prevención en el Municipio de San José del Guaviare, en el departamento de Guaviare (Colombia). MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio de métodos mixtos utilizando una encuesta que constaba de 45 preguntas sobre conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas y entrevistas semiestructuradas con personal médico y trabajadores del gobierno. RESULTADOS: Aceptaron realizar la encuesta 103 personas, el 72% fueron mujeres, edad promedio de 40,8 años, tiene acueducto el 60% y alcantarillado 53,4%. El 59% reportó haber tenido malaria, 76% reconoció un mosquito como el vector de la enfermedad, 6% reconoce al Anopheles como el vector. El 16,5% de los encuestados asegura que la malaria no es un problema de salud para ellos y sus familias. El uso de toldillos (74%) es considerado una eficaz protección. CONCLUSIONES: Se evidencia un buen conocimiento de la malaria después de los acuerdos de paz, sin embargo, los determinantes relacionados con suministro de agua, alcantarillado, difícil atención en zona rural y las escasas acciones interdisciplinarias son posibles elementos de riesgo para esta población.
The objective of the study was to describe the community and government dynamics around malaria, especially its control and prevention, in the Municipality of San José del Guaviare, in the sector of Guaviare (Colombia). METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study using a survey consisting of 45 questions on knowledge, attitudes, and practices, and semi-structured interviews with medical personnel and government workers. RESULTS: 103 people responded to the survey. 72% were women, and the average age was 40.8 years. 60% had an aqueduct and 53.4% had sewers. 59% reported having had malaria, 76% recognized a mosquito as the vector of the disease, and 6% recognized Anopheles as the vector. 16.5% of those surveyed said that malaria was not a health problem for them and their families. 74% considered the use of mosquito nets an effective protection. CONCLUSIONS: While there is a good knowledge of malaria, difficulties related to water supply, sewage, care in rural areas and lack of interdisciplinary solutions pose possible risk factors for this population.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Knowledge , Malaria/prevention & control , Colombia/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Malaria primarily affects populations living in poor socioeconomic conditions, with limited access to basic services, deteriorating environmental conditions, and barriers to accessing health services. Control programmes are designed without participation from the communities involved, ignoring local knowledge and sociopolitical and cultural dynamics surrounding their main health problems, which implies imposing decontextualized control measures that reduce coverage and the impact of interventions. The objective of this study was to determine the community perception of malaria in the municipality of Olaya Herrera in the Colombian Pacific. METHODS: A 41-question survey on knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to malaria, the perception of actions by the Department of Health, and access to the health services network was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 134 adults were surveyed, in whose households a total of 671 people lived. According to the survey data, about 80% of the household members included teenagers and children, out of which 61% had malaria at one time, and for 75.3%, this disease is a persistent problem. In spite of this, 57.2% of people who fell ill due to malaria were never visited by health personnel for a follow up. This population claimed that responsibility for who should prevent the disease is shared between each person and the Department of Health. However, personal actions were focused on using mosquito nets, ignoring other important practices to prevent bites. Despite campaigns by the Department of Health, 11.9% of respondents did not know how malaria was transmitted, and 8.96% thought it was transmitted through water. Also, 43.5% said that the Department of Health did not do any work to control malaria and 16% did not know if any action was taken. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the knowledge about malaria and the efforts of the Department of Health to prevent it, the community actions do not seem to be consistent with this knowledge, as the number of cases of malaria is still high in the area.
