Environmental contamination by cyclophosphamide preparation: Comparison of conventional manual production in biological safety cabinet and robot-assisted production by APOTECAchemo.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare environmental contamination of cyclophosphamide (CP) during 1 week of drug compounding by conventional manual procedure in a biological safety cabinet (BSC) with laminar airflow and a new robotic drug preparation system (APOTECAchemo). METHODS: During four consecutive days, similar numbers of infusion bags with cyclophosphamide were prepared with both techniques in a cross-over design. Wipe samples (49 for BSC, 50 for APOTECAchemo) were taken at several locations (gloves, infusion bags, trays, BSC-benches, floor) in the pharmacy and analyzed for CP concentrations by GC-MSMS (LOD 0.2 ng/sample). RESULTS: The detection rate was 70% in the BSC versus 15% in APOTECAchemo. During manual preparation of admixtures using BSC contamination with CP was below 0.001 ng/cm(2) at most locations, but significant on gloves (0.0004-0.0967 ng/cm(2)) and the majority (70%) of infusion bags (<0.0004-2.89 ng/cm(2)). During robotic preparation by APOTECAchemo, gloves (1 of 8: 0.0007 ng/cm(2)) and infusion bags (3 of 20: 0.0005, 0.0019, 0.0094 ng/cm(2)) were considerably less contaminated. Residual contamination was found on the surfaces under the dosing device in the compounding area (0.0293-0.1603 ng/cm(2)) inside the robotic system. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to outcomes of other studies, our results underline good manufacturing procedures in this pharmacy with low contamination for both techniques (BSC and APOTECAchemo). Comparison of both preparation procedures validated that contamination of infusion bags was much lower by using the robotic system.

Evaluation of ultraviolet irradiation efficacy in an automated system for the aseptic compounding using challenge test.

OBJECTIVE: Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation efficacy in the intravenous compounding robot APOTECAchemo was evaluated to define the best operative conditions in terms of sterility and time optimization. DESIGN: The challenge test was used against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis spores and Candida albicans. Inoculated plates were placed inside the robot and irradiated for different times. Microbial air and surface quality inside the equipment were monitored utilizing settle and contact plates, swabs. RESULTS: After 4 h, no microorganisms were viable with killing rates ranging from 5- to 7-log for different microorganisms after 1 h of exposition. In confirmation of the efficacy of the UV irradiation program adopted, the microbial monitoring inside the equipment always gave negative results. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first exhaustive investigation of UV irradiation efficacy in the aseptic pharmaceutical production. We demonstrated that UV irradiation plays an essential role in maintaining the sterility condition of the workplace inside the APOTECAchemo and assuring the standards for aseptic manufacturing of medicinal drugs, as required for Class A clean areas. A 4-h UV irradiation also ensures sterility in the case of very resistant microorganisms and in the presence of high microbial charge (10(8) CFU/ml), but a killing rate of 5 or more is already recorded after the first hour of exposition. The results provide useful information for the best operative conditions in terms of both sterility and time optimization, not only for the automated compounding, but also for the traditional aseptic manufacturing processes.