Efficacy of tildrakizumab by patient demographic and disease characteristics across a phase 2b and 2 phase 3 trials in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Tildrakizumab is a high-affinity, anti-interleukin-23p19 monoclonal antibody approved for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of patient demographic and disease characteristics on tildrakizumab efficacy using phase 2b/3 trial data. METHODS: Data from patients who received placebo, or tildrakizumab 100 or 200 mg, in P05495 [NCT01225731], reSURFACE 1 [NCT01722331] and reSURFACE 2 [NCT01729754] were analysed. Patient subgroups were defined by age, sex, race, weight, self-reported psoriatic arthritis, failure of ≥1 traditional systemic treatment and prior biologic use. Percentage of Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75 and 90 responders at Week 12 were compared across treatment arms in each subgroup. Absolute PASI at Weeks 0 and 12 was also determined for each subgroup. RESULTS: Among patients randomized in P05495 (N = 355), reSURFACE 1 (N = 772) and 2 (N = 1090), percentage of PASI 75 and 90 responders were significantly greater for each tildrakizumab dose vs. placebo (P < 0.0001). PASI 75 and 90 responder percentages were numerically greater in patients <65 years of age, bodyweight ≤90 kg, without psoriatic arthritis and with no prior biologic exposure (only PASI 90), vs. their counterparts in corresponding subgroups. There were no clear or consistent differences in efficacy between the other subgroups. Absolute PASI scores were generally similar across subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Small numerical differences in tildrakizumab efficacy were observed between subgroups defined by patient age and weight, presence of psoriatic arthritis and prior biologic use. These differences were not clinically meaningful; however, analyses of long-term data may be of value. Tildrakizumab efficacy did not differ with respect to patient sex or race, or number of prior failed conventional systemic treatments. Overall, these results suggest tildrakizumab may be appropriate for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in patients with a range of demographic and disease characteristics.

Apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis: results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar psoriasis is a variant of psoriasis vulgaris which can severely impair quality of life. OBJECTIVES: The main objectives of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study were to assess the efficacy and impact on quality of life and work productivity of apremilast for the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis. METHODS: A total of 100 patients with moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis were randomized to either apremilast 30 mg bid or placebo for 16 weeks. At Week 16, all patients received apremilast 30 mg bid until Week 32. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a Palmoplantar Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (PPPGA) of 0/1 at Week 16. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who achieved a PPPGA of 0/1 at Week 16 between patients randomized to apremilast (14%) and placebo (4%; P = 0.1595). After 32 weeks of treatment with apremilast, 24% of patients achieved a PPGA of 0/1. In addition, apremilast was superior to placebo in achieving Palmoplantar Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PPPASI) 75 (apremilast: 22%; placebo: 8%; P = 0.0499), in improving PPPASI (apremilast: -7.4 ± 7.1; placebo: -3.6 ± 5.9; P = 0.0167), Dermatology Life Quality Index score (apremilast: -4.3 ± 5.1; placebo: -0.8 ± 4.5; P = 0.0004) and in reducing activity impairment (apremilast: -11.0 ± 22.3; placebo: 2.5 ± 25.5; P = 0.0063). CONCLUSION: Despite the absence of a significant difference between apremilast and placebo in proportion of patients achieving a PPPGA of 0/1, the presence of significant differences observed for several secondary endpoints suggests that apremilast may have a role in the treatment of moderate-to-severe palmoplantar psoriasis.

Adapalene-benzoyl peroxide, a unique fixed-dose combination topical gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a transatlantic, randomized, double-blind, controlled study in 1670 patients.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy utilizing agents with complementary mechanisms of action is recommended by acne guidelines to help simultaneously target multiple pathogenic factors. A unique, topical, fixed-dose combination gel with adapalene 0.1% and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) 2.5% has recently been developed for the once-daily treatment of acne. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adapalene 0.1%-BPO 2.5% fixed-dose combination gel (adapalene-BPO) relative to adapalene 0.1% monotherapy (adapalene), BPO 2.5% monotherapy (BPO), and the gel vehicle (vehicle) in a large population for the treatment of acne vulgaris. METHODS: In total, 1670 subjects were randomized in a double-blind controlled trial to receive adapalene-BPO, adapalene, BPO or vehicle for 12 weeks (1 : 1 : 1 : 1 randomization). Evaluations included success rate (subjects 'clear' or 'almost clear'), percentage change in lesion count from baseline, cutaneous tolerability and adverse events. RESULTS: Adapalene-BPO was significantly more effective than corresponding monotherapies, with significant differences in percentage lesion count change observed as early as 1 week. Cutaneous tolerability profile was similar to adapalene. Adverse events were more frequent with the combination therapy (mainly due to an increase in mild-to-moderate dry skin), occurred early in the study, and were transient. CONCLUSIONS: Adapalene-BPO provides significantly greater and synergistic efficacy and a faster onset of action with an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of acne vulgaris when compared with the corresponding vehicle and the adapalene and BPO monotherapies.

Efficacy of ISA247 in plaque psoriasis: a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study.

BACKGROUND: The use of systemic calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of patients with psoriasis is limited by toxicity, particularly nephrotoxicity. ISA247, a novel inhibitor, was effective and well tolerated in a phase II study of patients with plaque psoriasis. Therefore its efficacy was assessed in this phase III study. METHODS: 451 patients aged 18-65 years with plaque psoriasis involving at least 10% of the body surface area were randomly assigned in equal proportions to receive placebo or ISA247 at 0.2 mg/kg, 0.3 mg/kg, or 0.4 mg/kg orally twice a day in dermatology clinics. The primary endpoint was a 75% reduction in the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI 75) score at week 12. Treatment allocation was concealed from patient and physicians doing the assessments by use of sealed envelopes. The method of analysis was by modified intention to treat. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00244842. FINDINGS: 107, 113, and 116 patients were assigned to the ISA247 0.2 mg/kg, 0.3 mg/kg, and 0.4 mg/kg groups, respectively, and 115 to the placebo group. At week 12, PASI 75 scores were achieved in the ISA247 0.2 mg/kg, 0.3 mg/kg, and 0.4 mg/kg groups by 14 (16%; 95% CI 9-24) of 105, 26 (25%; 17-24) of 111, and 44 (47%; 27-57) of 113 patients, respectively, and in the placebo group by 4 (4%; 0-8) of 113 patients. Efficacy was maintained during 24 weeks. Mild to moderate glomerular filtration rate reductions were noted in seven patients in the ISA247 0.4 mg/kg group and in one in the ISA247 0.3 mg/kg group. ISA247 blood concentrations showed a strong correlation with mean percentage reduction in PASI. INTERPRETATION: ISA247 was safe and effective in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis during 24 weeks, with the highest dose providing the best efficacy. The strong correlation between ISA247 concentrations and efficacy might allow for accurate dosing of patients compared with existing calcineurin inhibitors.