Surgical aortic valve replacement in very elderly patients aged 80 years and over: evaluation of early clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: An increasing number of very elderly patients aged ≥80 years will require aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS). Many are classified as high-risk surgical candidates. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been proposed as an alternative to surgical AVR (SAVR) for high-risk patients. We evaluated early clinical outcomes of very elderly patients undergoing SAVR to optimise TAVI candidate selection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case review of 132 consecutive patients aged ≥80 years undergoing isolated SAVR (49 patients) or combined SAVR/CABG (83 patients) during February 2002-January 2010 at a single tertiary referral hospital. Risk for cardiac surgery was calculated using the logistic EuroSCORE (ES(log)). Mortality and morbidity data were collected for the 30-day postoperative period. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality rate was 8.3% for patients undergoing SAVR (6.1% for isolated SAVR and 9.6% for SAVR/CABG). Permanent stroke occurred in 3.8% and renal insufficiency in 7.6% of the cohort. Thirty-five percent of patients had left ventricular ejection fraction <50%, 67% had advanced symptoms (NYHA class III or IV), and 42% of patients were stratified as high-risk (ES(log)≥20%). CONCLUSIONS: SAVR can be performed in very elderly patients with acceptable operative morbidity and mortality. The outcomes at our institution are comparable to contemporary SAVR and TAVI outcomes.

Anaortic off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly and very elderly.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients undergoing surgical revascularisation may disproportionately benefit from avoiding manipulation of the ascending aorta and cardiopulmonary bypass. In this multi-centre observational study, we sought to determine the 30-day outcomes of anaortic off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) in an elderly and very-elderly population. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected for all patients aged >70 years old (y) undergoing anaortic OPCAB at three hospitals between January 2002 and October 2011. Analysis was carried out on two age sub-groups (70-79 y vs. ≥80 y). Multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictors of post-operative 30-day mortality. RESULTS: In total, 1135 patients >70 years underwent anaortic OPCAB - 817 (72%) patients were aged 70-79 y while 318 (28%) were aged ≥80 y. The rate of mortality and morbidity for both groups was low: 30-day mortality (70-79 y: 1.8%; ≥80 y: 2.8%) or permanent stroke (70-79 y: 0.2%; ≥80 y: 0.9%). Chronic lung disease, a history of previous myocardial infarction and left main disease were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: OPCAB is associated with low rates of 30-day mortality and peri-operative stroke in this elderly and very elderly patient cohort. Anaortic OPCAB can provide excellent short-term post-operative outcomes and may give the elderly and very elderly population the opportunity to benefit from surgical coronary revascularisation.

Anaortic coronary bypass surgery.

Review of the benefits and techniques for anaortic coronary bypass surgery.

Anaortic, total-arterial, off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: how to do it.

Several large series have demonstrated that performing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery without manipulating the ascending aorta (anaortic) utilising all-arterial grafts provides superior protection against neurological injury. Recent series comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with surgical revascularisation have demonstrated superior results for surgery over PCI. However, a significant criticism of coronary artery surgery remains the higher incidence of neurological injury when compared to PCI. We present a simple and reproducible technique for anaortic, total-arterial off-pump coronary artery revascularisation.

Anaortic techniques reduce neurological morbidity after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND: Stroke remains one of the most devastating complications of cardiac surgery. Advocates of off-pump coronary revascularisation (OPCAB) maintain that post-operative neurologic morbidity is reduced by avoiding aortic cannulation and cross-clamping, and by eliminating the systemic effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. We sought to determine whether completing off-pump coronary surgery without any aortic manipulation ("anaortic" technique) afforded any additional neurological protection, as compared to off-pump grafting in which the aorta was utilised for graft inflow. METHODS: A comprehensive review of prospectively collected data was undertaken of all patients undergoing OPCAB in our institution between January 2002 and December 2006. Cases requiring intra-operative conversion to cardiopulmonary bypass were excluded from further analysis. Patients having OPCAB surgery with aortic manipulation were compared to those having OPCAB surgery without aortic manipulation. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify possible predictors of post-operative neurologic morbidity, with particular focus on the role of aortic manipulation. RESULTS: During the period of review, 1758 patients underwent OPCAB, of which 1201 (68.3%) were completed without aortic manipulation, constituting the "anaortic" cohort. This group was compared with the remaining 557 patients, which included fashioning at least one aorto-conduit anastomosis, utilising either a side-biting aortic clamp or a no-clamp proximal anastomotic device. The two groups of patients were well-matched with respect to risk factors for adverse neurologic outcomes. Nine patients sustained focal neurological deficits (transient or permanent) in the peri-operative period, constituting a stroke rate of 0.51% for the entire series. The incidence of peri-operative neurological deficit in the anaortic group was 0.25% compared with 1.1% in the aortic manipulation group (odds ratio (OR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06-0.92, p=0.037). Advanced age was also associated with peri-operative neurological injury (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01-1.20, p=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery surgery is associated with a low incidence of peri-operative stroke. Completing the surgical procedure without manipulating the ascending aorta in any way ("anaortic" technique) offers additional neurological protection and should be the goal in all suitable off-pump coronary cases.

A novel custom-made long shunt simplifies the performance and improves the results of beating-heart surgery.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of a snare-related stenosis after beating-heart surgery prompted the search for an alternative method of hemostasis. Because of the shortcomings of commercial coronary shunts a novel custom-made coronary shunting technique was devised. It involves the use of varying lengths of 1.2-mm Silastic tubing secured with a fine silk "tag" suture. The technique of construction and deployment of the shunts is presented. A retrospective comparison of 500 off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) cases done with snares was made with 300 cases using custom-made long shunts (CLS). METHOD: Between June 1998 and December 2 000, 500 OPCAB surgeries were done using the Platypus stabilizer and Silastic snares for hemostasis. Thereafter, 300 surgeries were done with the same stabilizer but using CLS instead of snares. RESULTS: The CLS group had a perioperative infarction incidence of 1.6% compared with 4.4% in the snare group. Other measured parameters remained unchanged, but there was a profound, but subjectively noted, reduction in the incidence of hemodynamic instability in the shunted cases. CONCLUSION: The best method for control of coronary bleeding during beating-heart surgery remains controversial. There is increasing evidence that snares can cause artery damage and spasm. Shunting avoids this problem while enhancing hemodynamic stability and facilitating accurate anastomoses. The case against shunts is based mainly on inconvenience but this problem has been substantially negated by the introduction of the CLS technique.