Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Health Educ Behav ; 37(6): 831-48, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21051772

ABSTRACT

Using a randomized controlled trial, we tested the efficacy of a fall prevention intervention to reduce falls among adults in a community-based health promotion program. Adults aged 65 and older within two counties were recruited (control n = 257; intervention n = 286). After 12 months, there was a significant decrease in the number of falls in both groups (odds ratio = 0.45, p < .04), but the time by group membership interaction was not significant (χ(2) = 0.15, p < .69). Multivariate analysis did not find significant differences between the control and intervention groups for physical function as measured by a balance test or a sitting/standing test. Further research is needed on effective methods to deliver multifaceted fall interventions to older adults who are already being served by community health promotion programs.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/prevention & control , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Residence Characteristics , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Exercise , Female , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Humans , Male , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors
2.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 16(6): 469-77, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18515691

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of depression in Alzheimer Disease (AD) determined using National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) provisional criteria for depression in AD (NIMH-dAD) to those determined using other established depression assessment tools. DESIGN: Descriptive longitudinal cohort study. SETTING: The Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers of California. PARTICIPANTS: A cohort of 101 patients meeting NINDS-ADRDA criteria for possible/probable AD, intentionally selected to increase the frequency of depression at baseline. MEASUREMENTS: Depression was diagnosed at baseline and after 3 months using NIMH-dAD criteria and the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) Axis I Disorders. Depressive symptoms also were assessed with the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD), the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. RESULTS: The baseline frequency of depression using NIMH-dAD criteria (44%) was higher than that obtained using DSM-IV criteria for major depression (14%; Z = -5.50, df = 101, p <0.001) and major or minor depression (36%; Z = -2.86, df = 101, p = 0.021) or using established cut-offs for the CSDD (30%; Z = -2.86, df = 101, p = 0.004) or GDS (33%; Z = -2.04, df = 101, p = 0.041). The NIMH-dAD criteria correctly identified all patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depression, and correlated well with DSM-IV criteria for major or minor depression (kappa = 0.753, p <0.001), exhibiting 94% sensitivity and 85% specificity. The higher rates of depression found with NIMH-dAD criteria derived primarily from its less stringent requirements for the frequency and duration of symptoms. Remission rates at 3 months were similar across instruments. CONCLUSIONS: The NIMH-dAD criteria identify a greater proportion of AD patients as depressed than several other established tools.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Alzheimer Disease/psychology , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder, Major/psychology , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Mental Status Schedule/statistics & numerical data , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Personality Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results
3.
J Homosex ; 51(1): 33-57, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16893825

ABSTRACT

This study examines mental health issues among women of different sexual orientations. An anonymous survey was administered at 33 health care sites across the United States; the sample (N = 1304) included lesbians (n = 524), bisexual (n = 143) and heterosexual women (n = 637). Not only did sexual orientation influence the probability of experiencing emotional stress, but also whether a bisexual woman or lesbian had disclosed her sexual orientation (was "out") impacted the likelihood of having or having had mental health problems. Bisexual women and lesbians experienced more emotional stress as teenagers than did heterosexual women. Bisexual women were more than twice as likely to have had an eating disorder compared to lesbians. If a bisexual woman reported being out she was twice as likely to have had an eating disorder compared to a heterosexual woman. Lesbians who were not out and bisexual women who were out were 2-2.5 times more likely to experience suicidal ideation in the past 12 months. Lesbians and bisexual women who were not out were more likely to have had a suicide attempt compared to heterosexual women. Lesbians used psychotherapy for depression more commonly than did heterosexual or bisexual women. This is one of the few studies that compares lesbians, bisexual and heterosexual women. The implications of these findings are discussed.


Subject(s)
Bisexuality/psychology , Heterosexuality/psychology , Homosexuality, Female/psychology , Mental Health , Adult , Anxiety/epidemiology , Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Depression/epidemiology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/epidemiology , Female , Health Status , Health Surveys , Humans , Psychotropic Drugs/administration & dosage , Regression Analysis , Stress, Physiological/epidemiology , Suicide/psychology , Women's Health
4.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc ; 11(6): 737-46, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16248909

ABSTRACT

To explore verbal memory impairments associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), we compared proactive and retroactive interference effects on the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT; Delis et al., 1987) in a sample of 83 community-residing individuals with MS and 80 healthy participants. Individuals with MS demonstrated normal accumulation of proactive interference (PI), but attenuated release from PI relative to healthy individuals. Furthermore, accumulation of retroactive interference (RI) at short-delay free recall (SDFR) was intensified for those with MS as compared to healthy participants. Interestingly, accumulation of RI predicted long-term memory (LTM) only for participants with MS. These findings suggest that individuals with MS may experience particular difficulty when required to use semantic properties of information flexibly to facilitate verbal LTM.


Subject(s)
Memory Disorders/etiology , Memory/physiology , Multiple Sclerosis/complications , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Memory/classification , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neuropsychological Tests/statistics & numerical data , Reaction Time/physiology , Verbal Learning/physiology
5.
Arch Intern Med ; 164(6): 653-8, 2004 Mar 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15037494

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There has been increasing attention devoted to patient safety. However, the focus has been on system improvements rather than individual physician performance issues. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is an association between certain physician characteristics and the likelihood of medical board-imposed discipline. METHODS: Unmatched, case-control study of 890 physicians disciplined by the Medical Board of California between July 1, 1998, and June 30, 2001, compared with 2981 randomly selected, nondisciplined controls. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for physician discipline with respect to age, sex, board certification, international medical school education, and specialty. RESULTS: Male sex (OR, 2.76; P<.001), lack of board certification (OR, 2.22; P<.001), increasing age (OR, 1.64; P<.001), and international medical school education (OR, 1.36; P<.001) were associated with an elevated risk for disciplinary action that included license revocation, practice suspension, probation, and public reprimand. The following specialties had an increased risk for discipline compared with internal medicine: family practice (OR, 1.68; P =.002); general practice (OR, 1.97, P =.001); obstetrics and gynecology (OR, 2.25; P<.001); and psychiatry (OR, 1.87; P<.001). Physicians in pediatrics (OR, 0.62; P =.001) and radiology (OR, 0.36; P<.001) were less likely to receive discipline compared with those in internal medicine. CONCLUSION: Certain physician characteristics and medical specialties are associated with an increased likelihood of discipline.


Subject(s)
Employee Discipline/statistics & numerical data , Foreign Medical Graduates/standards , Licensure, Medical , Medicine/standards , Physicians/classification , Specialization , Adult , Aged , California , Case-Control Studies , Female , Foreign Medical Graduates/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Physicians/standards , Probability , Specialty Boards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...