Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br Dent J ; 2020 Aug 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32855517

ABSTRACT

Introduction The scope of practice of qualified dental hygienists and therapists allows them to undertake non-surgical periodontal screening, treatment and preventive care, and to diagnose and treatment plan. Therapists are also qualified to restore primary and secondary teeth, and to extract primary teeth. Both professions may see patients directly without needing a dentist's referral. In Scotland, they operate in a context of relatively poor but improving child oral health.Aim To investigate provision of dental care to children, including challenges encountered, by dental hygienists and therapists in the Scottish General Dental Service (GDS).Method An online survey of Scotland-based, GDC-registered dental hygienists and therapists in the GDS.Results Of 426 potential respondents, 194 (46%) responded, including 113 hygienists. Thirty hygienists and six therapists did not currently see child patients. Lack of referrals from dentists/specialisation by other team members, financial/contract reasons and lack of demand were the reasons given. Of those who did see children, most were therapists. Responsibility for preventive paediatric care was evenly split, with 71 (46%) citing the hygienist or therapist and 69 (45%) the dentist. Sixty-five (43%) reported barriers, most commonly relating to parents and children themselves. Time pressures, cost implications for practice and parents, and a number of practice and regulatory barriers were also mentioned.Discussion The response rate is considered to be very good. Limiting factors regarding provision of paediatric dental care include lack of referrals from GDPs and financial or contractual issues.Conclusion There appears to be considerable underuse of hygienists and therapists in respect to paediatric dental care.

2.
Br Dent J ; 2020 Aug 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32801320

ABSTRACT

Objectives To explore the level and nature of dental care provided by dental hygienists and therapists to older adults (65 and over) and to identify barriers to such care.Methods An online survey of all GDC-registered hygienists and therapists in Scotland.Results Thirty-two percent (196 of 609) responded. Seventy-five percent worked in general dental practice. Nearly two-thirds of the workload of those in general dental practice was with older patients. Most reported that numbers of such patients were increasing. Fifty-seven percent worked to inflexible appointment slots of 15 or 30 minutes. Time pressure, consent to treatment and power of attorney were the worst administrative problems in the workplace.Only one in four, mainly Public Dental Service (PDS) employees, provided domiciliary care or treated patients in care homes. Common problems in these settings were: poor hygiene, communicating with patients, capacity to consent, power of attorney, insufficient training and time, poor staff liaison, lack of support staff, space and equipment, poor denture storage/maintenance, co-morbidity and NHS charges exemption.Hygienist-therapists, who have a much wider clinical remit than hygienists, often felt their work with older people did not fully utilise their training. There was considerable demand for further training related to the care of older people, with dementia-related training being the most often specified. There was also support for greater professional autonomy through working on a direct access basis and having an NHS list number.Conclusion Respondents working in general practice saw a large proportion of older patients in the practice, while domiciliary and care home visits were largely undertaken by PDS workers. Findings support the conclusion that hygienist-therapists in particular, given their increasing numbers in the UK dental workforce, may be currently under-used in meeting the demand for prevention and treatment of older patients. The combination of demographic and clinical pressure may be met more effectively and economically by developing such 'mid-level' clinical roles in new models of dental care.

3.
BMC Oral Health ; 13: 58, 2013 Oct 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24160246

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Periodontal disease is the most common oral disease affecting adults, and although it is largely preventable it remains the major cause of poor oral health worldwide. Accumulation of microbial dental plaque is the primary aetiological factor for both periodontal disease and caries. Effective self-care (tooth brushing and interdental aids) for plaque control and removal of risk factors such as calculus, which can only be removed by periodontal instrumentation (PI), are considered necessary to prevent and treat periodontal disease thereby maintaining periodontal health. Despite evidence of an association between sustained, good oral hygiene and a low incidence of periodontal disease and caries in adults there is a lack of strong and reliable evidence to inform clinicians of the relative effectiveness (if any) of different types of Oral Hygiene Advice (OHA). The evidence to inform clinicians of the effectiveness and optimal frequency of PI is also mixed. There is therefore an urgent need to assess the relative effectiveness of OHA and PI in a robust, sufficiently powered randomised controlled trial (RCT) in primary dental care. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a 5 year multi-centre, randomised, open trial with blinded outcome evaluation based in dental primary care in Scotland and the North East of England. Practitioners will recruit 1860 adult patients, with periodontal health, gingivitis or moderate periodontitis (Basic Periodontal Examination Score 0-3). Dental practices will be cluster randomised to provide routine OHA or Personalised OHA. To test the effects of PI each individual patient participant will be randomised to one of three groups: no PI, 6 monthly PI (current practice), or 12 monthly PI.Baseline measures and outcome data (during a three year follow-up) will be assessed through clinical examination, patient questionnaires and NHS databases.The primary outcome measures at 3 year follow up are gingival inflammation/bleeding on probing at the gingival margin; oral hygiene self-efficacy and net benefits. DISCUSSION: IQuaD will provide evidence for the most clinically-effective and cost-effective approach to managing periodontal disease in dentate adults in Primary Care. This will support general dental practitioners and patients in treatment decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Protocol ID: ISRCTN56465715.


Subject(s)
Counseling , Dental Care/standards , Oral Hygiene/education , Periodontal Diseases/prevention & control , Primary Health Care/standards , Quality of Health Care , Adult , Aged , Dental Calculus/prevention & control , Dental Care/economics , Dental Plaque/prevention & control , Dental Prophylaxis/economics , Dental Prophylaxis/standards , Follow-Up Studies , Gingival Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Gingivitis/prevention & control , Health Behavior , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Middle Aged , Oral Hygiene/economics , Periodontal Pocket/prevention & control , Periodontitis/prevention & control , Precision Medicine , Quality of Life , Self Care , Self Efficacy , Single-Blind Method , Toothbrushing/methods , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...