Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J R Soc Med ; 102(10): 425-30, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19797600

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether medical students on graduate entry/fast- track programmes perform as well as students on standard courses. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University of Birmingham Medical School. PARTICIPANTS: Medical students on graduate entry/fast-track course and standard (5-year) course ('mainstream'). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Examination marks from all assessments taken simultaneously by graduate entry course (GEC) and mainstream course students once the cohorts have combined: i.e. for the final three years of the programme. Honours awards for 2007 and 2008 graduates. RESULTS: In total 19,263 examination results were analysed from 1547 students. Of these 161 were GEC students and 1386 were mainstream medical students. On average mainstream students, male students, overseas students and students of South Asian ethnicity obtained lower examination marks than graduate entry students, female students, home or EU students and students of non-South Asian ethnicity, respectively. Graduate entry students were significantly more likely to achieve honours degrees than mainstream students. CONCLUSION: On average the academic performance of Graduate Entry medical students at the University of Birmingham is better than mainstream medical students.


Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Undergraduate/organization & administration , Educational Measurement/statistics & numerical data , School Admission Criteria , Schools, Medical , Education, Graduate , Educational Status , England , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Students, Medical
2.
Med J Aust ; 185(1): 13-7, 2006 Jul 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16813540

ABSTRACT

A range of demographic, social and other factors are creating a crisis in the provision of clinical care in the United Kingdom for which the physician assistant (PA) model developed in the United States appears to offer a partial solution. Local and national moves are underway to develop a similar cadre of registered health care professionals in England, with the current title of medical care practitioners (MCPs). A competence and curriculum framework document produced by a national steering group has formed the basis for a recent consultation process. A limited evaluation of US-trained PAs working in the West Midlands region of England in both primary care and acute secondary care suggests that PA activity is similar to that of doctors working in primary care and to primary care doctors working in the accident and emergency setting. The planned introduction of MCPs in England appears to offer, first, an effective strategy for increasing medical capacity, without jeopardising quality in frontline clinical services; and, second, the prospect of increased flexibility and stability in the medical workforce. The deployment of MCPs may offer advantages over increasing the number of doctors or taking nurses out of nursing roles. The introduction of MCPs may also enhance service effectiveness and efficiency.


Subject(s)
Physician Assistants/trends , Program Development/methods , State Medicine/organization & administration , Credentialing/organization & administration , Curriculum , Emergency Medical Services/organization & administration , Health Policy , Humans , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Physician Assistants/education , Physician Assistants/standards , Primary Health Care , Professional Role , United Kingdom , Workforce
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...