Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
J Anim Sci ; 98(4)2020 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32206781

ABSTRACT

Stress is a biological adaptive response to restore homeostasis, and occurs in every animal production system, due to the multitude of stressors present in every farm. Heat stress is one of the most common environmental challenges to poultry worldwide. It has been extensively demonstrated that heat stress negatively impacts the health, welfare, and productivity of broilers and laying hens. However, basic mechanisms associated with the reported effects of heat stress are still not fully understood. The adaptive response of poultry to a heat stress situation is complex and intricate in nature, and it includes effects on the intestinal tract. This review offers an objective overview of the scientific evidence available on the effects of the heat stress response on different facets of the intestinal tract of poultry, including its physiology, integrity, immunology, and microbiota. Although a lot of knowledge has been generated, many gaps persist. The development of standardized models is crucial to be able to better compare and extrapolate results. By better understanding how the intestinal tract is affected in birds subjected to heat stress conditions, more targeted interventions can be developed and applied.


Subject(s)
Animal Welfare , Gastrointestinal Microbiome , Heat-Shock Response , Poultry/physiology , Animals , Farms , Gastrointestinal Tract/immunology , Gastrointestinal Tract/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Tract/physiology , Poultry/immunology , Poultry/microbiology
2.
Can J Vet Res ; 79(4): 285-9, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26424908

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity and determine the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the essential oils derived from Origanum vulgare (oregano), Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree), Cinnamomum cassia (cassia), and Thymus vulgaris (white thyme) against Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. The study also investigated the ability of these different bacterial strains to develop adaptation after repetitive exposure to sub-lethal concentrations of these essential oils. The MBC of the essential oils studied was determined by disc diffusion and broth dilution methods. All essential oils showed antimicrobial effect against all bacterial strains. In general, the development of adaptation varied according to the bacterial strain and the essential oil (tea tree > white thyme > oregano). Therefore, it is important to use essential oils at efficient bactericidal doses in animal feed, food, and sanitizers, since bacteria can rapidly develop adaptation when exposed to sub-lethal concentrations of these oils.


La présente étude avait pour but d'évaluer l'activité antimicrobienne et de déterminer la concentration bactéricide minimale (CBM) des huiles essentielles dérivées d'Origanum vulgare (origan), de Melaleuca alternifolia (l'arbre à thé), de Cinnamomum cassia (cassia), et de Thymus vulgaris (thym blanc) contre Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Enteritidis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, et Enterococcus faecalis. L'étude visait également à examiner la capacité de ces différentes souches bactériennes à développer une capacité d'adaptation après une exposition répétée à des concentrations sub-létales de ces huiles essentielles. La CBM des huiles essentielles étudiées a été déterminée par des méthodes de diffusion en disque et de dilution en bouillon. Toutes les huiles essentielles ont démontré un effet antimicrobien contre toutes les souches bactériennes. En général, le développement de la capacité d'adaptation variait selon la souche bactérienne et l'huile essentielle (arbre à thé > thym blanc > origan). Il est donc important que les huiles essentielles soient utilisées à des doses bactéricides efficaces dans la nourriture animale, les aliments, et les assainisseurs, étant donné que les bactéries peuvent rapidement développer une adaptation lorsqu'exposées à des concentrations sub-létales de ces huiles.(Traduit par Docteur Serge Messier).


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteria/drug effects , Food Additives/pharmacology , Oils, Volatile/pharmacology , Plant Oils/pharmacology , Animal Feed , Animals , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Plant Oils/chemistry , Plants/chemistry , Plants/classification
3.
Vet Immunol Immunopathol ; 165(1-2): 14-21, 2015 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25847354

ABSTRACT

The majority of Salmonella serovars cause no clinical disease in cattle, while some are associated with severe disease. The objective of the current study was to determine the innate immune responses of bovine peripheral blood leukocytes exposed to Salmonella enterica serovar Dublin (bovine-specific), Salmonella typhimurium (murine adapted, but zoonotic), and Salmonella enteritidis (poultry host-adapted) in 3-week-old calves. All Salmonella exposures increased cell surface CD14 and CD18 regardless of serovar. The greatest CD14 marker mean fluorescence was in monocytes and the greatest mean fluorescent of the marker mean was in neutrophils. Phagocytosis increased with all serovars, but was not different among them. Neutrophils had the greatest marker mean fluorescence for phagocytosis, with all serovars being equal. Oxidative burst increased in all serovars compared to control cells, but were not different among the serovars. Neutrophils and monocytes were similar in the oxidative burst, with limited oxidative burst detected in the primarily lymphocyte population. mRNA expression of TNF-α, IL-8, and IL-12, increased above the control cells whereas none of these serovars affected mRNA expression of TLR4. TNF-α was greatest in S. enterica and S. typhimurium, compared to Salmonella dublin. In contrast, IL-8 was expressed more in S. dublin than S. typhiurium, with S. Enteriditus intermediary. These results show while cell surface markers, phagocytosis, and oxidative burst were largely unaffected by serovar, cytokine and chemokine expression differed among the Salmonella serovars. It appears that internal responses of the cells differ, rather than cell recognition, creating pathogenicity differences among of the serovars, even in the neonate with developing immunity.


Subject(s)
Cattle/immunology , Immunity, Innate/immunology , Leukocytes/immunology , Salmonella enterica/immunology , Salmonella enteritidis/immunology , Salmonella typhimurium/immunology , Animals , Animals, Newborn/immunology , CD18 Antigens/immunology , Cattle Diseases/immunology , Female , Interleukin-12/blood , Interleukin-8/blood , Lipopolysaccharide Receptors/immunology , Phagocytosis/immunology , Respiratory Burst/immunology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/immunology , Toll-Like Receptor 4/blood , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/blood
4.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 11(8): 602-9, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24823991

ABSTRACT

Foodborne illness due to Salmonella-contaminated pork products is an important public health problem, causing significant economic losses worldwide. The use of bacteriophages is a potential intervention tool that has attracted interest for the control of foodborne pathogens. The objective of this study was to detect the presence of Salmonella in commercial pig farms and to isolate specific autochthonous bacteriophages against Salmonella Typhimurium, to characterize them and to evaluate their lytic capacity against Salmonella Typhimurium in vivo and in vitro. Salmonella was isolated on 50% (4/8) of the farms, with serotype Typhimurium being the most prevalent, detected in 48.2% of samples (13/27). The isolated Salmonella Typhimurium bacteriophages belong to the Podoviridae family, were active against serotypes Abony, Enteritidis, Typhi, and Typhimurium, but not against serotypes Arizonae, Cholerasuis, Gallinarum, and Pullorum. In in vitro tests, bacteriophage at 10(7) PFU/mL and 10(9) PFU/mL significantly reduced (p<0.05) Salmonella Typhimurium counts in 1.6 and 2.5 log10 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL, respectively, after 24 h. Before the in vivo treatment with bacteriophages, Salmonella was identified in 93.3% (28/30) of the fecal samples from the pigs inoculated with 10(6) CFU/mL, and only in 56.6% (17/30) after the treatment consisting of oral administration of the pool of the bacteriophages after the fasting period, simulating a common preslaughter practice. These results indicate that the pool of bacteriophages administered was capable of reducing the colonization of Salmonella in pigs.


Subject(s)
Bacteriophages/physiology , Meat/microbiology , Salmonella typhimurium/isolation & purification , Salmonella typhimurium/virology , Animals , Biological Control Agents , Colony Count, Microbial , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Food Microbiology , Foodborne Diseases/microbiology , Foodborne Diseases/prevention & control , Podoviridae/physiology , Swine/microbiology
5.
Animals (Basel) ; 3(2): 356-69, 2013 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26487407

ABSTRACT

Understanding and controlling environmental conditions is crucial to successful poultry production and welfare. Heat stress is one of the most important environmental stressors challenging poultry production worldwide. The detrimental effects of heat stress on broilers and laying hens range from reduced growth and egg production to decreased poultry and egg quality and safety. Moreover, the negative impact of heat stress on poultry welfare has recently attracted increasing public awareness and concern. Much information has been published on the effects of heat stress on productivity and immune response in poultry. However, our knowledge of basic mechanisms associated to the reported effects, as well as related to poultry behavior and welfare under heat stress conditions is in fact scarce. Intervention strategies to deal with heat stress conditions have been the focus of many published studies. Nevertheless, effectiveness of most of the interventions has been variable or inconsistent. This review focuses on the scientific evidence available on the importance and impact of heat stress in poultry production, with emphasis on broilers and laying hens.

7.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 8(12): 1269-74, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21854261

ABSTRACT

Salmonella shedding often increases in pigs after transportation and/or lairage. We previously showed that administering anti-Salmonella bacteriophages to pigs by gavage significantly reduced Salmonella colonization when the pigs were exposed to a Salmonella-contaminated holding pen. Here we tested whether a microencapsulated phage cocktail would remain effective if the treatment was administered to pigs in the feed. Pigs (n=21) were randomly placed into three groups: feed, gavage, and control. The feed group was direct-fed a microencapsulated phage cocktail daily for 5 days. On the fifth day, the gavage group received the same phage cocktail by gavage, whereas control pigs received a mock treatment containing no phage. All pigs were then orally challenged with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Fecal swab samples were collected every 2 h. At 6 h postchallenge, all pigs were euthanized, and ileal and cecal contents and mesenteric lymph nodes were collected and analyzed for the challenge organism. Pigs in the feed group were less likely to shed Salmonella Typhimurium at 2 h (38.1%) and 4 h (42.9%) postchallenge than pigs in both the gavage (2 h: 71.4%; 4 h: 81.1%) and control (2 h: 71.4%; 4 h: 85.7%) groups (p<0.05). Likewise, concentrations of Salmonella Typhimurium in ileal (2.0 log(10) colony forming units [CFU]/mL [contents]) and cecal (2.7 log(10) CFU/mL) contents from feed pigs were lower than ileal (3.0 log(10) CFU/mL) and cecal (3.7 log(10) CFU/mL) contents from control pigs. High concentrations of anti-Salmonella phages were detected in ileal and cecal contents from both feed and gavage pigs (feed ileal: 1.4×10(6); feed cecal 8.5×10(6); gavage ileal 2.0×10(4); gavage cecal: 2.2×10(3)). It is concluded that direct feeding of microencapsulated phages is a practical and effective means of reducing Salmonella colonization and shedding in pigs.


Subject(s)
Foodborne Diseases/prevention & control , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Salmonella Phages/physiology , Salmonella/virology , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Animal Feed/virology , Animals , Bacterial Shedding , Cecum/microbiology , Cecum/virology , Colony Count, Microbial , Drug Compounding , Feces/microbiology , Food Microbiology , Ileum/microbiology , Ileum/virology , Salmonella/growth & development , Salmonella Infections, Animal/prevention & control , Salmonella Infections, Animal/therapy , Salmonella typhimurium/growth & development , Salmonella typhimurium/virology , Swine , Swine Diseases/therapy , Swine Diseases/virology , Time Factors
8.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 8(5): 623-30, 2011 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21254892

ABSTRACT

Finishing pigs infected with Salmonella pose significant food safety risks by carrying the pathogen into abattoirs. This study was conducted to determine the dynamics of Salmonella infection in finishing pigs, and associated immunological, physiological, and behavioral alterations, by longitudinally comparing infected to noninfected pigs during 6 weeks postinfection (p.i.). Bacteriological data revealed that all inoculated pigs started shedding Salmonella within 2 h p.i., and persistently shed the bacteria up to the end of the study. Ileal and cecal contents, as well as mesenteric lymph node samples, were all positive throughout the study, containing 3-4 log(10) cfu/g of Salmonella at 24 h p.i., and 4-5 log(10) cfu/g of Salmonella up to 4 weeks p.i. Levels of Salmonella dropped markedly (p < 0.05) in all samples at 5 weeks p.i. There was no difference between groups for blood cell counts. Tumor necrosis factor-α was greater (p < 0.05) in infected pigs: (1) in the mesenteric lymph nodes by 48 h p.i.; (2) at 24 h and 3 weeks p.i. in the ileum; and (3) in the cecum and spleen at 3 weeks p.i. Interleukin-12, interleukin-1 and its antagonist, and a porcine-specific antimicrobial peptide RNA expression in tissues changed over time, but were not different between groups. Infected pigs spent more time in ventral recumbency, standing, and sitting than controls (p < 0.01). Infected pigs were also more active (p < 0.01), and approached a novel object more quickly than control pigs (p < 0.05). No treatment differences were detected for rectal temperature or plasma cortisol (p > 0.10). This study shows that finishing pigs can carry high levels of Salmonella for up to 4 weeks p.i. in the gastrointestinal contents and mesenteric lymph nodes, shedding high levels of the bacteria without developing clinical symptoms, but developing an immune response throughout the intestinal tract. Moreover, subtle behavioral changes measured as postures were detected, and therefore warrant additional investigation.


Subject(s)
Behavior, Animal , Carrier State/veterinary , Feces/microbiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Salmonella typhimurium/physiology , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Abattoirs , Animals , Carrier State/immunology , Carrier State/microbiology , Cytokines/genetics , Cytokines/metabolism , Gastrointestinal Contents/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Tract/immunology , Gastrointestinal Tract/microbiology , Liver/immunology , Longitudinal Studies , Lung/immunology , Lymph Nodes/immunology , Male , Random Allocation , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Salmonella Infections, Animal/immunology , Salmonella typhimurium/genetics , Salmonella typhimurium/immunology , Salmonella typhimurium/pathogenicity , Spleen/immunology , Swine , Swine Diseases/immunology , Toll-Like Receptors/genetics , Toll-Like Receptors/metabolism
9.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 76(1): 48-53, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19854929

ABSTRACT

Contamination of meat products with food-borne pathogens usually results from the carcass coming in contact with the feces of an infected animal during processing. In the case of Salmonella, pigs can become colonized with the organism during transport and lairage from contaminated trailers and holding pens, resulting in increased pathogen shedding just prior to processing. Increased shedding, in turn, amplifies the likelihood of carcass contamination by magnifying the amount of bacteria that enters the processing facility. We conducted a series of experiments to test whether phage therapy could limit Salmonella infections at this crucial period. In a preliminary experiment done with small pigs (3 to 4 weeks old; 30 to 40 lb), administration of an anti-Salmonella phage cocktail at the time of inoculation with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium reduced Salmonella colonization by 99.0 to 99.9% (2- to 3-log reduction) in the tonsils, ileum, and cecum. To test the efficacy of phage therapy in a production-like setting, we inoculated four market-weight pigs (in three replicates) with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and allowed the challenged pigs to contaminate a holding pen for 48 h. Sixteen naïve pigs were randomly split into two groups which received either the anti-Salmonella phage cocktail or a mock treatment. Both groups of pigs were comingled with the challenged pigs in the contaminated pen. Treatment with the anti-Salmonella phage cocktail significantly reduced cecal Salmonella concentrations (95%; P<0.05) while also reducing (numerically) ileal Salmonella concentrations (90%; P=0.06). Additional in vitro studies showed that the phage cocktail was also lytic against several non-Typhimurium serovars.


Subject(s)
Food Microbiology , Foodborne Diseases/prevention & control , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Salmonella Phages/growth & development , Salmonella typhimurium/virology , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Swine/microbiology , Animals , Cecum/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial , Ileum/microbiology , Palatine Tonsil/microbiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/therapy , Swine Diseases/therapy
10.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 6(7): 767-76, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19737056

ABSTRACT

All farm animals will experience some level of stress during their lives. Stress reduces the fitness of an animal, which can be expressed through failure to achieve production performance standards, or through disease and death. Stress in farm animals can also have detrimental effects on the quality of food products. However, although a common assumption of a potential effect of stress on food safety exists, little is actually known about how this interaction may occur. The aim of this review was to examine the current knowledge of the potential impact of stress in farm animals on food safety risk. Colonization of farm animals by enteric pathogens such as Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Campylobacter, and their subsequent dissemination into the human food chain are a major public health and economic concern for the food industries. This review shows that there is increasing evidence to demonstrate that stress can have a significant deleterious effect on food safety through a variety of potential mechanisms. However, as the impact of stress is difficult to precisely determine, it is imperative that the issue receives more research attention in the interests of optimizing animal welfare and minimizing losses in product yield and quality, as well as to food safety risks to consumers. While there is some evidence linking stress with pathogen carriage and shedding in farm animals, the mechanisms underlying this effect have not been fully elucidated. Understanding when pathogen loads on the farm are the highest or when animals are most susceptible to infection will help identifying times when intervention strategies for pathogen control may be most effective, and consequently, increase the safety of food of animal origin.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry , Animals, Domestic/microbiology , Animals, Domestic/physiology , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Stress, Physiological , Animal Husbandry/economics , Animal Husbandry/methods , Animal Welfare , Animals , Food Microbiology , Foodborne Diseases/prevention & control , Gastrointestinal Tract/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Tract/physiology , Gastrointestinal Tract/physiopathology , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Humans , Stress, Physiological/immunology , Stress, Psychological/immunology , Stress, Psychological/physiopathology , Stress, Psychological/prevention & control
11.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 6(7): 865-9, 2009 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19737062

ABSTRACT

On-farm reduction of Salmonella carriage prevalence in pigs requires the identification of risk factors to direct interventions development. This study was designed to determine if split marketing of finishing pigs constitutes a risk factor for Salmonella infections, by comparing Salmonella prevalence in the first group of pigs selected for harvest ("first pull") versus the prevalence in the last group of pigs selected for harvest ("close out") from multiple commercial finishing lots. Nine paired samplings were conducted consisting in matched groups of pigs from individual barns as the first pull and the close out with a 4-week interval between groups. From each group, fecal and meat samples were collected, on-farm and at harvest, respectively. Fecal samples were selectively enriched, and analyzed for the presence of Salmonella, whereas meat juice samples were analyzed for the presence of antibodies against Salmonella. In 7/9 (77.8%) of the studied barns, an increase in Salmonella prevalence was observed, based on both bacteriologic and serologic analysis. Overall, there was an increase of 9.2% (p < 0.05) in bacteriologic prevalence, and 31.3% (p < 0.05) in serologic prevalence from first pull to close out groups. This study demonstrates that a significant increase in Salmonella prevalence occurs between the first and the last group of pigs harvested from finishing lots, with close out groups of market pigs posing a higher risk for Salmonella contaminations.


Subject(s)
Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Salmonella enterica/isolation & purification , Swine Diseases/epidemiology , Swine/microbiology , Animal Husbandry/methods , Animals , Bacterial Shedding , Carrier State/diagnosis , Carrier State/veterinary , Diet , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Feces/microbiology , Meat/microbiology , Prevalence , Rectum/microbiology , Risk Factors , Salmonella Infections, Animal/blood , Salmonella enterica/physiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Statistics as Topic , Swine/blood , Swine Diseases/blood , Time Factors , United States/epidemiology
12.
J Food Prot ; 72(1): 43-8, 2009 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19205462

ABSTRACT

To monitor the effects of feed withdrawal on the prevalence of Campylobacter, market-weight turkeys from six farms were examined before and after perimarketing events (feed withdrawal, transport, and holding at the slaughterhouse). Prior to transport, birds (n = 30 per farm) were slaughtered on-farm, and viscera (crops, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, colon, ceca, gallbladder, and spleen) were removed on the premises. Within ca. 48 h, cohorts (n = 30 per farm) from the same flock were transported to a commercial abattoir, maintained in holding sheds, slaughtered, and the viscera were removed. No differences in the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. were evident when individual flocks were compared pre- and posttransport. However, when data for the six farms were combined, Campylobacter spp. were recovered (pre- versus posttransport) at comparable rates from the duodenum (74.7 versus 74.7%), ileum (87.3 versus 92.7%), ceca (64 versus 57%), colon (86.7 versus 80%), and spleen (0 versus 0%). After feed withdrawal, transport, and holding at the abattoir, there was an overall increase in Campylobacter spp. isolated from the gallbladder at the abattoir (14.7%) when compared with on-farm levels (0%, P < 0.05). When compared with on-farm levels (3%), the overall increase in Campylobacter spp. recovered from the crops of birds at the abattoir (24%) was significant (P < 0.05), which may be associated with a detectable decline in lactic acid in the emptied crop.


Subject(s)
Animal Husbandry/methods , Campylobacter Infections/veterinary , Campylobacter coli/isolation & purification , Campylobacter jejuni/isolation & purification , Food Contamination/analysis , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Turkeys/microbiology , Abattoirs , Animals , Campylobacter Infections/epidemiology , Campylobacter Infections/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial , Consumer Product Safety , Crop, Avian/chemistry , Crop, Avian/microbiology , Food Microbiology , Gallbladder/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Tract/microbiology , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Prevalence , Transportation
13.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 20(5): 620-4, 2008 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18776096

ABSTRACT

The current study was conducted to evaluate 5 bacteriologic culture methods (methods 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5) for recovery of Salmonella enterica from swine feces, both for sensitivity of detection (ability to recover Salmonella from a positive sample) and for specificity (not to inadvertently identify an organism as a Salmonella species in a negative sample). Fifty-six negative samples and 46 positive samples were processed using each of the 5 methods, which differed primarily in the combinations of enrichment media used. All negative samples were negative for Salmonella when cultured by all 5 methods (100% specificity). Two of the methods (methods 1 and 4) resulted in the recovery of significantly less (P < 0.05) Salmonella when compared with the remaining 3 methods (methods 2, 3, and 5). No one method was successful in recovering Salmonella from all positive samples, although recovery with method 2 was statistically similar to the total number of positive samples analyzed (42 vs. 46 Salmonella-positive samples, P > 0.05). This study shows that culture methods differ significantly in their performance regarding the isolation of Salmonella from swine fecal samples.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Feces/microbiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/diagnosis , Salmonella enterica/isolation & purification , Swine Diseases/microbiology , Animals , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Salmonella enterica/growth & development , Sensitivity and Specificity , Swine , Swine Diseases/diagnosis
14.
J Food Prot ; 69(8): 1785-93, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16924900

ABSTRACT

The goal of this study was to determine if preslaughter events, such as transport to and holding at the slaughterhouse, affect Salmonella prevalence in turkeys. Floors of transport crates were swabbed after loading and prior to transport at the farm (time 1, n = 100 swabs per trial) and after transport to and holding at the abattoir (time 2, n = 100 swabs per trial). In addition, environmental samples were taken at each of the six premises (n = 25 per premises) as well as in the holding shed at the abattoir (n = 25 samples per trial). At slaughter, the crops, ceca, and spleens were cultured (n = 50 each per flock). As shown from the culture of the crate floor swabs collected pre- and posttransport, when individual farms were analyzed, samples from only one premises exhibited a statistically significant change, as seen by the decline in Salmonella prevalence posttransport (P < 0.01). When the data from all farms were combined, Salmonella was recovered more frequently from swabs collected pretransport at loading on-farm (time 1, 47.6%) than from swabs collected after transport (time 2, 39.7%, P < 0.01). This suggests that transport to and holding at the abattoir do not increase the prevalence of Salmonella in turkeys. This observation contrasts with the increase in Salmonella prevalence reported for hogs and some broilers.


Subject(s)
Abattoirs , Animal Husbandry/methods , Poultry Diseases/epidemiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Turkeys/microbiology , Animals , Body Weight , Cloaca/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial , Floors and Floorcoverings , Food Microbiology , Poultry Diseases/microbiology , Prevalence , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Transportation
15.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 17(1): 80-3, 2005 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15690959

ABSTRACT

Four culture methods (A, B, C, and D) were comparatively evaluated for their ability to isolate Salmonella enterica from pooled swine fecal samples (n = 100). None of the methods was able to isolate Salmonella from all positive samples. The relative sensitivity of the culture methods evaluated was 82%, 94%, 95%, and 78% for methods A, B, C, and D, respectively. The comparison of sensitivities showed that methods B and C performed significantly better (P < 0.05) than methods A and D. Although relative sensitivities of methods B and C were equal, from the 89 positive samples concomitantly detected by both, 35 (39.3%) had different serotypes (no match) isolated by each method. On the basis of the results of this study, it was concluded that culture methods differ on the isolation of S. enterica serotypes from naturally contaminated swine fecal samples. Depending on the objective(s) of investigations on the ecology and epidemiology of S. enterica in swine populations, a method or a combination of methods should be considered for more reliable results.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques/veterinary , Culture Techniques/veterinary , Feces/microbiology , Salmonella enterica/isolation & purification , Swine/microbiology , Animals , Sensitivity and Specificity
16.
J Food Prot ; 68(8): 1720-3, 2005 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21132985

ABSTRACT

Recent research has shown that much preharvest Salmonella enterica infection in pigs occurs immediately before slaughter during this rest period in the contaminated abattoir holding pens. The objective of this study was to evaluate a potential intervention strategy to reduce the prevalence of S. enterica-positive pigs at slaughter, which consisted of resting pigs prior to slaughter on their transport vehicle, instead of in the abattoir holding pen. Additionally, the effect of transportation of pigs from farm to the abattoir on S. enterica prevalence was investigated. A total of 120 animals were included in the experiment, divided in four replicates (n = 30 pigs per replicate). Fecal samples were collected from each animal at the farm and at the abattoir, where 15 randomly chosen pigs were unloaded and moved to a holding pen, while the remaining 15 pigs stayed in the transport trailer. After approximately 1.5 h of resting, both groups were slaughtered. Samples collected included distal ileum portion, cecal contents, and ileocecal lymph node. The overall S. enterica prevalence (pigs positive in at least one of the samples collected at slaughter) was higher for pigs held in the abattoir pens (40.7% versus 13.3%, P < 0.05). There was no difference (P > 0.05) for the S. enterica prevalence before and after transportation from farm to abattoir (5.8% versus 0.8%, respectively). This study demonstrates that resting pigs on the transport vehicle has the potential to decrease S. enterica levels entering the abattoir.


Subject(s)
Abattoirs , Salmonella enterica/growth & development , Swine/microbiology , Transportation , Animals , Cecum/microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Food Contamination/analysis , Food Contamination/prevention & control , Humans , Ileum/microbiology , Lymph Nodes/microbiology , Prevalence
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...