Psychometric features of brief pain inventory for Parkinson's disease during medication states.

PURPOSE: Patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) suffer from different non-motor symptoms, including pain. The present study aimed to measure the psychometric properties of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) in patients with PD during ON- and OFF-states. METHODS: We recruited 460 patients with PD and 100 non-PD controls. The pain was assessed by the BPI, King's Parkinson's disease Pain Scale (KPPS), Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI), Visual Analogue Scale-Pain (VAS-pain), and short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2) in both medication states. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability was examined using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Dimensionality and convergent validity of BPI were also investigated. Diagnostic accuracy and discriminative validity were determined by Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis and Area Under the Curve (AUC). RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha was satisfactory (α = 0.91-0.97) in both states. The ICC values were 0.85-0.96 in ON- and OFF-state. Factor analysis revealed two factors. A high correlation was obtained between BPI subscales and other scales. AUC >0.91, sensitivity, and specificity> 0.77 were observed for discriminating different pain levels. Furthermore, appropriate diagnostic accuracy was found (AUC, sensitivity, and specificity >0.67) between non-PD control and PD patients. CONCLUSION: The BPI has acceptable psychometric features as well as diagnostic accuracy for patients with PD.Implications for rehabilitationPain as a non-motor symptom in PD can affect daily and social activities.The BPI is used to assess pain severity and interference in activities.For better treatment, pain should be assessed in off-state like to on-state.BPI has satisfactory reliability and validity in different medication states in PD.

Psychometric properties of dexterity questionnaire-24 in Iranian chronic stroke survivors.

INTRODUCTION: Dexterity is one of the most critical upper extremity functions that may be impaired in chronic stroke survivors. This study aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of DextQ-24 in Iranian chronic stroke survivors. METHOD: A total of 123 people with chronic stroke were included in the study. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed through Cronbach's alpha and Interclass Correlation (ICC), respectively. Dimensionality was performed by Exploratory Factor Analysis. In addition, to assess the convergent validity of DextQ-24, Box and Block Test, Motor Activity Log Questionnaire, ABILHAND Questionnaire, and Purdue Pegboard Test were used. Discriminant validity of DextQ-24 was measured between different stages of recovery (Brunnstrom stage). Acceptability was calculated by ceiling and floor effect. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha and ICC were 0.92 and 0.91, respectively. The 24 items of this questionnaire were classified into six components. Further, a moderate to strong correlation between the total score of DextQ-24 with other tools | r = 0.41-0.84 | was obtained. The results of discriminant validity approved the ability of the total score of DextQ-24 to separate different stages of recovery. The results also reported that this questionnaire did not have a significant ceiling and floor effect. CONCLUSION: The results of our study showed that the Persian DextQ-24 has high reliability and a good convergent and discriminant validity in people with chronic stroke for dexterity measurement as a PROM questionnaire.

Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale: Psychometric properties during medication phases in idiopathic Parkinson disease.

BACKGROUND: Independence in activities of daily living (ADL) is one of the most important aspects in planning treatment for people with Parkinson disease (PD). The Barthel Index (BI) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) are commonly used in neurological diseases. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to confirm the validity and reliability of the BI and mRS in PD during ON and OFF medication phases. METHODS: We included 260 individuals with a diagnosis of idiopathic PD. The disability in ADL was measured by the BI, mRS, Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39), Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale-Activities of Daily Living (UPDRS-ADL), and Schwab and England ADL scale (SE). Test-retest, inter-rater reliability, and internal consistency were assessed by the intra-class correlation (ICC) and Cronbach α coefficients. Dimensionality was evaluated by factor analysis. Convergent validity was assessed by the SE, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), PDQ-39 and UPDRS-ADL. RESULTS: For the 260 participants (187 [71.9%] males; mean [SD] age 60.3 [12.3] years), both the BI and mRS achieved an acceptable level of test-retest and inter-rater reliability (ICC=0.77 to 0.91) in ON and OFF medication phases. The Cronbach α for BI was 0.85 and 0.88, respectively. We found 1 and 2 factors for BI in ON and OFF phases, respectively. Investigation of convergent validity showed moderate to high correlation for the BI with the UPDRS-ADL, SE, PDQ-39 (ADL), BBS and mRS scores in ON and OFF phases (ρ=0.51-0.74) and mRS with SE, UPDRS-ADL, PDQ-39 (ADL) and BBS scores (ρ=0.48-0.82). CONCLUSION: The BI and mRS showed acceptable validity and reliability to measure the degree of disability in patients with PD in daily activities in both ON and OFF medication phases.

Can Postural Instability in Individuals with Distal Radius Fractures Be Alleviated by Concurrent Cognitive Tasks?

BACKGROUND: Although impaired postural control may be a risk factor for distal radius fractures (wrist fractures), which often are caused by falls, little attention has been given thus far to the various performance and neurophysiologic aspects involved. Although studies suggest that external focus and cognitive tasks can improve postural control, it remains unclear whether these benefits are observed in individuals with a history of distal radius fracture and to what extent. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) To compare patients with a history of distal radius fracture to age- and sex-matched controls in terms of postural stability while standing on stable and unstable support surfaces, using both postural sway and neurophysiological measures as endpoints; and (2) to determine whether internal- and external-focus strategies and cognitive tasks can improve postural stability in these patients. METHODS: Forty patients with distal radius fracture (33 females and seven males with a mean ± SD age of 56 ± 4 years) and 40 sex- and age-matched control participants participated in the study. We recruited patients with a history of fall-induced distal radius fractures occurring between 6 and 24 months before the start of our study. We excluded patients who had any of the following: fear of falling, taking any medication that may affect balance, neurologic disorders, dizziness, vestibular problems, Type II diabetes, musculoskeletal disorders or recent history of lower extremity fracture, any recent surgical interventions in the spine or lower limbs, and/or cognitive impairment. Of 120 patients who were being treated for distal radius fracture over the 18-month period, 91 (76%) agreed to participate and 40 eligible patients were finally enrolled. The control group included sex- and age-matched (within 2-year intervals) individuals who had never had a wrist fracture. This group was selected from attendants/relatives of the patients attending the neurology and physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient departments, as well as other volunteers with no history of balance problems or wrist fractures. To address our primary research question, we compared the postural control of individuals with a history of distal radius fracture with the control group while quietly standing on different support surfaces (rigid and foam surfaces) using both postural sway measures obtained by a force plate as well as neurophysiological measures (electromyography [EMG] activity of tibialis anterior and medial gastrocnemius). To address our secondary research question, we compared the postural sway measures and EMG activity of the ankle muscles between different experimental conditions (baseline, internal focus (mentally focusing on their feet without looking), external focus (mentally focusing on rectangular papers, placed on the force plate or foam, one under each foot), difficult cognitive task (recalling maximum backward digits plus one) and easy cognitive task (recalling half of the maximum backward digits). RESULTS: Patients with distal radius fractures presented with greater postural sway (postural instability) and enhanced ankle muscle activity compared with their control counterparts, but only while standing on a foam surface (mean velocity: 5.4 ± 0.8 versus 4.80 ± 0.5 [mean difference = 0.59, 95% CI of difference, 0.44-0.73; p < 0.001]; EMG root mean square of the tibialis anterior: 52.2 ± 9.4 versus 39.30 ± 6 [mean difference = 12.9, 95% CI of difference, 11.4-14.5; p < 0.001]). Furthermore, a decrease in postural sway was observed while standing on both rigid and foam surfaces during the external focus, easy cognitive, and difficult cognitive conditions compared with the baseline (for example, mean velocity in the baseline condition compared with external focus, easy cognitive task and difficult cognitive task was: 4.9 ± 1.1 vs 4.7 ± 1 [mean difference = 0.14, 95% CI of difference, 0.11-0.17; p < 0.001], 4.6 ± 1 [mean difference = 0.25, 95% CI of difference, 0.21-0.29; p < 0.001], and 4.5 ± 1 [mean difference = 0.34, 95% CI of difference, 0.29-0.40; p < 0.001] in the wrist fracture group). The same result was obtained for muscle activity while standing on foam (EMG root mean square of tibialis anterior in the baseline condition compared with external focus, easy cognitive task and difficult cognitive task: 58.8 ± 7.2 versus 52.3 ± 6.6 [mean difference = 6.5, 95% CI of difference, 5.5-7.6; p < 0.001], 48.8 ± 7.1 [mean difference = 10.1, 95% CI of difference, 9-11.1; p < 0.001], 42.2 ± 5.3 [mean difference = 16.7 95% CI of difference, 15.1-18.2; p < 0.001] in the wrist fracture group). CONCLUSIONS: The current results suggest that patients with a history of distal radius fractures have postural instability while standing on unstable support surfaces. This instability, which is associated with enhanced ankle muscle activity, conceivably signifying an inefficient cautious mode of postural control, is alleviated by external attention demands and concurrent cognitive tasks. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study may serve as a basis for designing informed patient-specific balance rehabilitation programs and strategies to improve stability and minimize falls in patients with distal radius fractures. The integrative methodology presented in this work can be extended to postural control and balance assessment for various orthopaedic/neurological conditions.