Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Eur J Intern Med ; 71: 50-56, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31690479

ABSTRACT

Hypertensive emergencies (HE) and urgencies (HU) are frequent causes of patients referral to Emergency Department (ED) and the approach may be different according to local clinical practice. Our aim was to explore awareness, management, treatment and counselling after discharge of HE and HU in Italy, by mean of an on-line survey. The young investigator research group of the Italian Society of Hypertension developed a 23-item questionnaire spread by e-mail invitation to the members of Italian Scientific societies in the field of Hypertension. 665 questionnaires were collected from EDs, Emergency and Urgency Medicine, Cardiology or Coronary Units, Internal Medicines, Intensive care, Stroke units. Symptoms considered suspicious of acute organ damage were: chest pain (89.0%), visual disturbances (89.8%), dyspnoea (82.7%), headache (82.1%), dizziness (52.0%), conjunctival haemorrhages (41.5%), tinnitus (38.2%) and epistaxis (34.4%). Exams more frequent prescribed were: electrocardiogram (97.2%), serum creatinine (91.4%), markers of cardiomyocyte necrosis (66.2%), echocardiography (65.1%). The use of intravenous or oral medications to treat HEs was 94.7% and 3.5%, while for HUs 24.4% and 70.8% respectively. Of note, a surprisingly high percentage of physicians (22 % overall, 24.5% in North Italy) used to prescribe sublingual nifedipine. After discharge, home blood pressure monitoring and general practitioner re-evaluation were more frequently suggested, while ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and hypertension specialist examination were less prescribed. The differences observed across the different macro-areas, regarded prescription of diagnostic test and drug administration. This survey depicts a complex situation of shades and lights in the real-life management of HE and HU in Italy.


Subject(s)
Emergencies , Hypertension , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Critical Care , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Italy
2.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents ; 30(2): 593-8, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27358154

ABSTRACT

Our aim was to test, by a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial, whether a short-term treatment with a combined lipid-lowering nutraceutical could improve endothelial function in a cohort of moderately hypercholesterolemic subjects. Thus, 80 healthy, moderately hypercholesterolemic subjects were consecutively enrolled and, after 4 weeks of stabilization diet, they were randomized to either the tested lipid-lowering nutraceutical or placebo for 8 weeks. At the beginning and end of treatment a complete lipid pattern, safety parameters, hs-CRP and endothelial function were measured. When compared to placebo, during nutraceutical treatment patients experienced a more favorable percentage change in total cholesterol (TC vs baseline: -17.9%; TC vs placebo: -5.6%), LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C vs baseline: -23.3%; LDL-C vs placebo: -2.8%), hs-CRP (hs-CRP vs baseline: -2.4%; hs-CRP vs placebo: -1.5%), and endothelial function (pulse volume displacement vs baseline: +17%; pulse volume displacement vs placebo treatment: -3.3%). No significant difference was observed in respect to effects on triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol and safety parameters. On the basis of our data, the tested lipid-lowering nutraceutical seems to significantly improve endothelial function in moderately hypercholesterolemic subjects. These results have to be confirmed on larger patient samples and over longer periods.


Subject(s)
C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Dietary Supplements , Endothelium, Vascular/physiology , Hypercholesterolemia/drug therapy , Hypolipidemic Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Dietary Supplements/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Hypercholesterolemia/blood , Male , Middle Aged
3.
Physiol Res ; 64(6): 807-19, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26047383

ABSTRACT

To propose a test to evaluate endothelial function, based on VO(2) on-transition kinetics in sub-anaerobic threshold (AT) constant load exercise, we tested healthy subjects and patients with ischemic-hypertensive cardiopathy by two cardiopulmonary tests on a cycle ergometer endowed with an electric motor to overcome initial inertia: a pre-test and, after at least 24 h, one 6 min constant load exercise at 90 % AT. We measured net phase 3 VO(2)-on kinetics and, by phase 2 time constant (tau), valued endothelial dysfunction. We found shorter tau in repeated tests, shorter time between first and second test, by persisting endothelium-dependent arteriolar vasodilatation and/or several other mechanisms. Reducing load to 80 % and 90 % AT did not produce significant changes in tau of healthy volunteers, while in heart patients an AT load of 70 %, compared to 80 % AT, shortened tau (delta=4.38+/-1.65 s, p=0.013). In heart patients, no correlation was found between NYHA class, ejection fraction (EF), and the two variables derived from incremental cycle cardio-pulmonary exercise, as well as between EF and tau; while NYHA class groups were well correlated with tau duration (r=0.92, p=0.0001). Doxazosin and tadalafil also significantly reduced tau. In conclusion, the O(2) consumption kinetics during the on-transition of constant load exercise below the anaerobic threshold are highly sensitive to endothelial function in muscular microcirculation, and constitute a marker for the evaluation of endothelial dysfunction.


Subject(s)
Anaerobic Threshold , Endothelium, Vascular/physiopathology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Microcirculation , Myocardial Ischemia/physiopathology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Exercise/physiology , Exercise Test , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscles/blood supply
4.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 104(1): 183-8, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24582152

ABSTRACT

AIM: To identify and quantify the role of different risk factors in the long-term development of IFG and T2DM in a rural Italian population sample with family history of T2DM. METHODS: We selected a sample of 1271 adult subjects from among those 1851 consecutively visited during four consecutive Brisighella Heart Study surveys (1996-2008), then selecting those ones with a family history of T2DM. Thus, we obtained a final sample including 545 subjects and for which a full clinical and ematochemistry data set was available. RESULTS: The Cox-regression model better predicting the incident IFG and T2DM included age, gender, FPG, TG and SUA. The model best predicting the incident IFG status alone (without T2DM) is very similar to that predicting both IFG and T2DM, including the same predictors. Finally, the model best predicting T2DM (excluding IFG) simply includes FPG, BMI and ALT/AST ratio. Repeating the Cox-regression analysis using BMI as a covariate, TG appears to be also a significant predictor of T2DM (HR 1.018 95% CI 1.009-1.041, p=0.013). CONCLUSION: In a sample of subjects with a family history of diabetes the best long-term predictors of IFG are age, gender, FPG, TG and SUA, while those of T2DM are FPG and BMI.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Fasting/blood , Forecasting , Risk Assessment/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/blood , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young Adult
5.
Clin Exp Hypertens ; 34(8): 601-5, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22574612

ABSTRACT

Our aim was to evaluate the predictors of Isoleucine-Proline-Proline/Valine-Proline-Proline (IPP-VPP) lactotripeptides (LTPs) antihypertensive effect in the context of a short-term large double-blind randomized clinical trial involving 164 pharmacologically untreated subjects in primary prevention for cardiovascular disease. When compared with the baseline, office systolic blood pressure (SBP) (-3.42 mm Hg, P < .001) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (-2.35 mm Hg, P < .001) significantly decreased, in the LTP-treated patients only. No significant change in predictors during the study of ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) parameters was observed. A short-term supplementation with LTPs significantly improves the office SBP and DBP, especially in male subjects. The main predictor of LTP antihypertensive effect was the baseline BP.


Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Hypertension/drug therapy , Oligopeptides/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Caseins/chemistry , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Hypertension/classification , Hypertension/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Office Visits , Predictive Value of Tests , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...