ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mutational analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can potentially be used for early detection of recurrence after resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Mutations from tumor may be identified in plasma as an early sign of recurrence. We conducted a pilot study investigating if somatic mutations could be detected in plasma in patients undergoing liver resection for HCC and in patients with advanced non-resectable HCC. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively included patients undergoing curative liver resection for HCC. Tumor tissue was investigated with whole exome sequencing and preoperative blood samples were evaluated for ctDNA using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) with TruSight Oncology 500 including 523 cancer-associated genes. Subsequently, the method was evaluated in patients with advanced HCC. We included eight patients curatively resected for HCC, where tumor tissue mutations were identified in seven patients. However, only in one patient tumor specific mutations were found in the preoperative blood sample. In all three patients with advanced HCC, tumor mutations were detected in the blood. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resectable HCC, ctDNA could not be reliably detected using the applied targeted NGS method. In contrast, ctDNA was detected in all patients with advanced HCC. Small tumors, tumor heterogeneity and limited sequencing coverage may explain the lack of detectable ctDNA.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/genetics , Circulating Tumor DNA/genetics , Precision Medicine/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Circulating Tumor DNA/analysis , DNA, Neoplasm/genetics , Denmark , Female , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/genetics , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Pilot Projects , Exome Sequencing/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Allograft dysfunction after liver transplantation has a profound impact on the risks of death and retransplantation within the first year. We tested whether elevated hyaluronic acid (HA; a glycosaminoglycan cleared by hepatic sinusoidal endothelium) levels may predict excess risk of graft loss. METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center prognostic cohort study. Patients with either a plasma sample before transplantation, an early post-transplantation sample nearest day 30 (range 10-89 d, 80% within days 15-60), or both were included. Plasma HA was measured with the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The primary end point was 1-year graft loss (all-cause mortality and retransplantation). A secondary end point was biliary stricture. RESULTS: In this study, 169 of 196 patients who received a liver transplant in the study period were included. Pre-transplantation HA (n = 152) did not predict graft loss. Post-transplantation HA (n = 124) was higher among patients with graft loss (median, 177 µg/L [interquartile range (IQR), 89-465] vs 54 µg/L [IQR 37-93]) and was a strong predictor of this outcome (hazard ratio per 50 µg/L, 1.24 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.34]). The discriminatory ability of HA was high (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.77-0.94]) and noninferior to other liver function tests. When adjusted for known risk factors of graft loss, HA remained an independent predictor of graft loss. CONCLUSIONS: High post-transplantation plasma HA level was a strong predictor of 1-year all-cause mortality and retransplantation, whereas pre-transplantation levels were not, despite variety in the time span of blood sampling. Prospective studies are warranted to assess the utility of HA in liver transplantation.
