Assessing the Accessibility of Content for Geriatric Fellowship Programs.

The information available on program websites concerning geriatric fellowships in internal medicine and family medicine is a crucial factor in generating applicants' interest in individual programs. Our study aimed to quantify the accessibility and quality of information available on accredited geriatric (family medicine and internal medicine) fellowship program websites and further analyze the implications of the results obtained. A list of geriatric (family medicine and internal medicine) fellowship programs was analyzed through quantified measures after being verified for accreditation. Certain criteria were evaluated for each of these programs, such as website accessibility and whether critical information was available on online program websites. These criteria were centered on academic, administrative, and application-based factors. Hundred and fifty eight Family Medicine and Internal Medicine geriatric fellowship programs were identified in total, of which only 150 were accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and considered for analysis. Of these, 20 (13.33%) programs had website links that were nonfunctional and only 145 programs had websites at all. On programs' websites, information regarding aspects such as contact information-including phone number or email for the program-were lacking. Other information regarding past and current fellows, research, and curriculum were also generally lacking. Geriatric Fellowship websites in Family Medicine and Internal Medicine can gain better traction from those interested in applying for their programs by updating information more often and providing more and better information concerning critical aspects of the programs themselves online.

Geriatrics Fellowship-Family Medicine: Evaluation of Fellowship Program Accessibility and Content for Family Medicine Applicants.

BACKGROUND: Website content and accessibility has the potential to influence the applicant's decision whether to interview for the program or not. The objective of our study is to determine the content and accessibility of the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) Directory and accredited geriatric (family medicine) fellowship program websites. METHODS: A list of geriatric (family medicine) fellowship programs was retrieved using the AAFP Directory and verified for accreditation. Contact information was compared between the directory and the fellowship websites. The programs' website links from the directory were evaluated and compared with Google search. The websites' accessibility and content were assessed for program, education, and application overview. RESULTS: Fifty programs were identified, but 43 programs were chosen for analysis. There was an incongruence of over 50% of contact information between the AAFP Directory and the website page. Regarding content, most websites were lacking in fellows' profile information, previous research studies, and application ID. CONCLUSION: AAFP Directory and fellowship websites can improve geriatric (family medicine) fellowship recruitment by updating their information and providing more accessible and accurate content.

National trends in emergency department use, care patterns, and quality of care of older adults in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To describe trends in use of emergency departments (EDs) of older adults, reasons for visits, resource use, and quality of care. DESIGN: Analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. SETTING: U.S. emergency departments from 2001 to 2009. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older visiting U.S. EDs. MEASUREMENTS: Emergency departments (ED) visits by patients aged 65 and older were identified, and demographic, clinical, and resource use characteristics and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: From 2001 to 2009, annual visits increased from 15.9 to 19.8 million, a 24.5% increase. Numbers of outpatients grew less than hospital admissions (20.2% vs 33.1%); intensive care unit admissions increased 131.3%. Reasons for visits were unchanged during the study; the top complaints were chest pain, dyspnea, and abdominal pain. Resource intensity grew dramatically: computed tomography 167.0%, urinalyses 87.1%, cardiac monitoring 79.3%, intravenous fluid administration 59.8%, blood tests 44.1%, electrocardiogram use 43.4%, procedures 38.3%, and radiographic imaging 36.4%. From 2005 to 2009, magnetic resonance imaging use grew 84.6%. The proportion receiving a potentially inappropriate medication decreased from 9.6% in 2001 to 4.9% in 2009, whereas the proportion seen in the ED, discharged, and subsequently readmitted to the hospital rose from 2.0% to 4.2%. CONCLUSION: Older adults accounted for 156 million ED visits in the United States from 2001 to 2009, with steady increases in visits and resource use across the study period. Hospital admissions grew faster than outpatient visits. If changes in primary care do not affect these trends, facilities will need to plan to accommodate increasingly greater demands for ED and hospital services.