JOURNAL CLUB: Can Coronal STIR Be Used as Screening for Acute Nontraumatic Hip Pain in Children?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate whether coronal STIR MRI can be used as a screening test for nontraumatic acute hip pain in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2008 to 2012, we identified all patients younger than 18 years at our tertiary care facility who underwent pelvic MRI including coronal STIR for the following indications: acute hip pain, limping, or refusal to bear weight. Patients with a history of trauma were excluded. Each MR image was independently reviewed by four radiologists who were blinded to the clinical outcome. After first reviewing the coronal STIR images only, they then reviewed the full MRI studies in a random order different from that used for review of the coronal STIR images. The sensitivity and specificity of STIR-only images in identifying the presence of abnormality and specific diagnoses were calculated, with the full MRI study considered as the reference standard. Kappa values were calculated for STIR-only and full MRI studies. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients (67 female patients and 60 male patients; median age, 9 years; range, 5 months to 17 years) were identified. The most common abnormalities (calculated as the mean of frequency values noted by four readers) were hip effusion (52%; range, 46-58%), osteomyelitis (42%; range, 29-48%), and myositis (32%; range, 20-40%). For the detection of any abnormality, STIR-only images had a mean sensitivity of 95% and a mean specificity of 67%. For approximately one-third of STIR-only studies with true-positive results, additional abnormalities were found on full MRI studies. CONCLUSION: Coronal STIR imaging of the pelvis has high sensitivity (95%) in the detection of abnormalities associated with acute nontraumatic hip pain in children, but it often misses additional abnormalities.

Concomitant lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and plasma cell myeloma, a diagnostic challenge.

BACKGROUND: Lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and plasma cell myeloma are two B cell lymphoproliferative neoplasms derived from mature B-lymphocytes in different differentiation stages. The coexistence of these two tumors in the same patient is exceedingly rare and can be difficult to diagnose. CASE PRESENTATION: A 76-year-old male presented with a pathologic fracture after a fall. Radiography showed a lytic lesion in the pelvis. Serum immunofixation showed distinct IgM kappa and IgA kappa monoclonal protein bands. Bone marrow examination revealed aggregates of small, mature lymphoid cells with admixed plasma cells. Immunohistochemical studies and flow cytometric analysis showed the lymphoid cells were CD10-/CD5- kappa restricted monoclonal B cells. The plasma cells were monoclonal with kappa light chain restriction. The majority of plasma cells were positive for IgA and cyclin D1 with a few plasma cells positive for IgM. Additional studies showed the presence of both a positive MYD88 L265P mutation and a CCND1/IGH fusion. A diagnosis of concomitant lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and plasma cell myeloma was rendered. CONCLUSION: Concomitant lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma and plasma cell myeloma can be rarely encountered and is diagnostic challenging. It is commonly associated with biclonal monoclonal proteins. This case demonstrates the importance of a comprehensive work-up in the diagnosis of this disease combination and highlights the diagnostic role of MYD88 mutation study.

Real view radiology-impact on search patterns and confidence in radiology education.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Search patterns are important for radiologists because they enable systematic case review. Because radiology residents are exposed to so many imaging modalities and anatomic regions, and they rotate on-and-off service so frequently, they may have difficulty establishing effective search patterns. We developed Real View Radiology (RVR), an educational system founded on guided magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) case review and evaluated its impact on search patterns and interpretative confidence of junior radiology residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: RVR guides learners through unknown examinations by sequentially prompting learners to certain aspects of a case via a comprehensive question set and then providing immediate feedback. Junior residents first completed a brief evaluation regarding their level of confidence when interpreting certain joint MRI cases and frequency of search pattern use. They spent four half-days interpreting cases using RVR. Once finished, they repeated the evaluations. The junior resident results were compared to third-year residents who had not used RVR. The data were analyzed for change in confidence, use of search patterns, and number of cases completed. RESULTS: Twelve first-year and thirteen second-year residents (trained cohort) were enrolled in the study. During their 4-week musculoskeletal rotations, they completed on average 29.3 MRI knee (standard deviation [SD], 1.6) and 17.4 shoulder (SD, 1.2) cases using RVR. Overall search pattern scores of the trained cohort increased significantly both from pretraining to posttraining (knee P < .01, shoulder P < .01) and compared to the untrained third-year residents (knee (P < .01, and shoulder P < .01). The trained cohort confidence scores also increased significantly from pre to post for all joints (knee P < .01, shoulder P < .01, pelvis P < .01, and ankle P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Radiology residents can increase their MRI case interpretation confidence and improve the consistency of search pattern use by training with a question-based sequential reveal educational program. RVR could be used to supplement training and assist with search pattern creation in areas in which residents often do not acquire adequate clinical exposure.

CT of the hip prosthesis: appearance of components, fixation, and complications.

Multidetector computed tomography (CT) is an excellent way to supplement the radiographic evaluation of problematic hip prostheses. Multidetector CT is well suited for assessing periprosthetic bone, determining precise acetabular cup position, and evaluating periprosthetic fluid collections or ossified masses. Metal implants pose a number of challenges in the performance and interpretation of CT examinations. However, metal artifacts can be minimized by decreasing the detector collimation and pitch, increasing the kilovolt peak and milliampere-seconds, and using appropriate reconstruction algorithms and section thickness. Image interpretation requires a basic understanding of hip reconstruction and hip implants, as well as use of a systematic method of analysis that incorporates prior radiographic findings and CT findings. Radiologists must be familiar with the normal and abnormal CT appearances of hip prostheses and be able to recognize common complications on CT scans.