From cognitive information to shared meaning: healing principles in prevention intervention.

Families with parental affective disorder participated in a large-scale longitudinal study which involved participation in a standardized, short-term, psychoeducational preventive intervention. These families were followed for at least 3 years. An analysis of clinical material from the first 12 families to complete the intervention identified specific healing principles that contributed to positive changes in behavior and attitude. The healing elements of the intervention included demystification of the illness, modulation of shame and guilt, increase in the capacity for perspective taking, and development of a hopeful perspective and belief in one's own competence. Therapeutic effectiveness evolved in a process that linked cognitive information and presented depression as an illness that could be understood with the acknowledgement of family members' individual and collective experience. In this way, families developed a shared understanding of the illness that was useful over time. This article discusses the ways in which the healing principles promoted changes in family members' behavior and attitude, which, in turn, enhanced resiliency in children.

Sustained change in parents receiving preventive interventions for families with depression.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the sustained effects of two cognitive, psychoeducational preventive interventions for families in which a parent had an affective disorder. METHOD: Thirty-seven families, in which there was a child between the ages of 8 and 15 years (mean = 11.5 years) and at least one parent who had experienced a recent episode of affective disorder according to the Research Diagnostic Criteria, were studied 1.5 years after enrollment in the study. The families were randomly assigned to one of two interventions, clinician-facilitated or lecture. The two interventions were similar in content but differed in the degree of involvement of the children and the linking of information to the families' life experiences. Nineteen families participated in the clinician-facilitated intervention, which consisted of six to 10 sessions. Eighteen families were assigned to the lecture condition, which consisted of two lectures attended only by parents. Family members were interviewed both before and after the interventions with diagnostic interviews and semistructured measures designed to assess response to the interventions. RESULTS: Sustained effects of the interventions were reported 1.5 years after enrollment. The clinician-facilitated intervention was associated with more positive self-reported and assessor-rated changes than the lecture intervention. CONCLUSIONS: These short-term preventive interventions, particularly the clinician-facilitated one, have long-term benefits for families with parental affective disorder.

Examination of children's responses to two preventive intervention strategies over time.

OBJECTIVE: To examine long-term effects of two forms of preventive intervention designed to increase families' understanding of parental affective disorder and to prevent depression in children. METHOD: Thirty-six families who had a nondepressed child between ages 8 and 15 years and a parent who had experienced affective disorder were enrolled and randomly assigned to either a clinician-facilitated intervention or a lecture discussion group. Each parent and child were assessed prior to randomization, after intervention, and approximately 1 1/2 years after enrollment. Assessments included standard diagnostic interviews, measures of child and family functioning, and interviews about experience of parental affective disorder and intervention effects. RESULTS: Children in the clinician-facilitated group reported greater understanding of parental affective disorder, as rated by self-report, rater-generated scales, and parent report, and had better adaptive functioning after intervention. Parents in the clinician-facilitated intervention group reported significantly more change. CONCLUSION: Findings from both interventions support the value of a future-oriented resiliency-based approach. The greater effects of the clinician-facilitated intervention support the need for linking cognitive information to families' life experience and involving children directly in order to achieve long-term effects.

Examination of preventive interventions for families with depression: evidence of change.

Thirty-seven families who had a child between the ages of 8 and 15 (mean age = 12.0 years) and had at least one parent, who had experienced a recent episode of affective disorder were assigned randomly to one of two psychoeducational interventions. The interventions (clinician-facilitated or lecture-group discussion) were designed to prevent childhood depression and related problems through decreasing the impact of related risk factors and encouraging resiliency-promoting behaviors and attitudes. They were similar in content but differed in the level of the children's involvement and the degree to which the families' individual life experiences were linked to the educational material. Assessments included standard diagnostic and social functioning instruments and interviews designed specifically for this project to assess behavior and attitude change. Each parent and child was individually assessed by separate assessors who were blind to information about the other family members. Parent participants in both groups reported being satisfied with the intervention. Clinician group participants reported a significantly larger number of overall changes, as well as higher levels of change regarding communications about the illness with their children and increased understanding by the children of their illness. Significantly more children in the clinician group also reported they gained a better understanding of parental affective illness as a result of their participation in the project.

Response of families to two preventive intervention strategies: long-term differences in behavior and attitude change.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the long-term impact of two forms of preventive intervention designed to diminish risk to children in families in which one or both parents suffered from affective disorder. METHOD: Fifty-four parents in 18 families were initially assessed and randomly assigned to one of two interventions--a clinician-facilitated, manual-based, psychoeducational preventive intervention or a standardized lecture-group discussion in which similar educational information was presented. Assessments included standard diagnostic interviews, child behavior scales, and semistructured interviews with parents about the effects of the intervention. Follow-up assessments were conducted three times over the 3-year follow-up interval. RESULTS: No harmful effects were reported for either intervention, and ratings of degree of upset about reported concerns declined across time for both conditions. Families receiving the clinician-facilitated intervention reported more behavior and attitude changes than did lecture-group families when assessed after intervention. The difference between the two groups was sustained at further follow-up assessments. CONCLUSION: Although both preventive interventions produced changes in behaviors and attitudes, parents in the clinician-facilitated intervention reported more benefit. These data support the hypothesis that linking cognitive information to the family's life experience produces long-term changes.

Comparison of preventive interventions for families with parental affective disorder.

Twenty families participated in a random assignment trial of two cognitive psychoeducational preventive interventions for families with parental affective disorder. Twelve families were assigned to a clinician-based intervention and eight to a lecture-based intervention, with assessment prior to intervention and an average of 18 weeks following intervention. Both groups were satisfied and believed they received help from the intervention. The clinician-based group was significantly more satisfied overall, and reported significantly more changes in both behaviors and attitudes about their illness from pre- to postintervention. Both groups showed significant decrease in degree of upset over issues of concern from pre- to postintervention. The clinician-based group reported receiving significantly more help with their primary concern. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Initial findings on preventive intervention for families with parental affective disorders.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a clinician-based cognitive, psychoeducational, preventive intervention for families with parental affective disorder that would be suitable to widespread use, test its feasibility and safety, and define the areas affected by the intervention. The intervention was designed to increase understanding of parental illness and resilience in the children. METHOD: The authors studied the first seven families (14 parents) to receive the intervention. Enrollment criteria included affective disorder during the preceding year in at least one parent, presence of at least one child between the ages of 8 and 14 years who was not psychiatrically ill at the time of participation, and willingness to participate in the research study. The intervention consisted of parent, child, and family sessions. Assessment included semistructured interviews with parents about affective disorders, standard ratings of marital satisfaction and therapeutic alliance, and a recently developed semistructured interview to assess response to the intervention. RESULTS: Overall satisfaction with the intervention was rated moderate to high by parents. No harm was reported. Ten of 14 parent subjects reported five or more behavior and attitude changes that they attributed to the intervention. The most frequent behavior and attitudinal changes reported were increased discussion of the illness and related issues and increased understanding of information about affective illness. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that the intervention is safe and feasible in families with parental affective disorder.