Dyssynchronous apraxia: failure to combine simultaneous preprogrammed movements.

Limb apraxia, a defect in skilled, learned purposive movement, may be related to impairment of either representational or innervatory components of praxis processing. Innervatory motor patterns, in turn, may involve on-line motor programs (visual feedback-controlled) or prepared movement programs (independent of continuous visual feedback). We evaluated movement abilities ofthe innervatory pattern system in TB,a 26-year-old patient with apraxia from a left dorsolateral frontal stroke. TB and four controls performed nonmeaningful single and multi-joint movements to command, with multi-joint movements combined sequentially (e.g. "open and close your hand and then bend your elbow") or simultaneously (e.g. "open and close your hand; keep doing that while bending your elbow"). TB showed no difference between single-joint (71.5% correct) and multi-joint movements in sequential combinations (68% correct), but she was significantly worse at simultaneous movement combinations (28.6% correct; P < .02). Controls performed consistently at > 90% mean accuracy. TB and four normals also performed the Fitts (1954) task, in which they alternately tapped with a pen between two target circles of varying size. TB was proportionately slower than controls on the larger Fitts circles, which call predominantly on prepared movement programs; her performance on the smaller circles (involving more on-line programs) was comparable to normals. We conclude that functional synchrony of one innervatory pattern subtype, prepared movement programs, may require late-level frontal processing, and that failure at this level can result in both apraxia and defective programming of nonmeaningful movements.

Transitive movements in a deafferented man.

It has not been determined if the performance of transitive movement requires sensory feedback from the limb to the brain. We tested a deafferented patient's ability to pantomime, imitate, and use actual objects in both eyes open and eyes closed conditions. Although his performance deteriorated when his eyes were closed, the major error made by this patient was the inability to correctly orient the instrument (or pretended instrument) toward the object of the instrument's action.

Apraxia after a superior parietal lesion.

We studied a patient who had unilateral (left) limb apraxia associated with a lesion of her right superior (Brodmann areas 5 and 7) and inferior parietal lobes. In monkeys areas 5 and 7 contain "hand-manipulation neurons" that are thought to be important in proprioceptive guidance. Therefore, we tested our patient with her eyes open and closed. Her left hand performance with pantonime, imitation, and use of actual objects dramatically deteriorated in the absence of visual guidance. In addition, although the patient did not have optic ataxia and had normal proprioception, she had difficulty using her left forelimb in tasks that require transcoding from a visual to a somatesthetic spatial coordinate system. We propose that each superior parietal lobe is not only responsible for transcoding from a visual-spatial code into a somatesthetic-spatial code but is also critical for transcoding spatial-temporal representations of skilled movement into a somatesthetic-spatial code.