Assessing Knowledge, Usage, and Perceptions of the Frazier Free Water Protocol: A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Dysphagia is very common among hospitalized patients and is associated with increased length of hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality. Diet restrictions for dysphagia cause dehydration and discontent. The Frazier Free Water Protocol (FFWP) was developed to improve hydration and quality of life in dysphagia patients by establishing the safety of allowing sips of water between meals. Despite these potential benefits, we hypothesized that the FFWP is not widely utilized. We sought to determine barriers to utilization by assessing the familiarity, usage, and perceptions of the FFWP among health-care providers at our institution. METHODS: We distributed an anonymous questionnaire to a convenience sample of nurses in the hospital during daily huddles. The questionnaire was adapted from a validated framework to assess provider acceptability of health-care interventions. RESULTS: Of the 66 surveys distributed, we had 58 completed (88%). Only 10 nurses (17%) had heard of the "FFWP" by name. For those that were familiar with the indications, benefits, and risks of giving free water to patients with dysphagia (n = 18), less than half (39%) reported doing so. No nurses that had less than 10 y of patient care experience gave water to dysphagia patients, even if they knew the indications, benefits, and risks. Similarly, less than a fifth (19%) of all nurses surveyed were comfortable giving water to dysphagia patients, but comfort increased for some if the protocol was recommended by a speech-language pathologist (33%) or physician (13%). Nursing experience of >10 y or in intensive care settings did not yield significant differences in knowledge, usage, or comfort level than those with less years or nonintensive care experience, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses are essential to the implementation of the FFWP, yet many are unfamiliar and uncomfortable with utilizing it. Education about the protocol is necessary to improve patient outcomes and quality of life. We plan to provide targeted education about the FFWP as well as assess other members of the health-care team, in an attempt to increase utilization of the protocol and improve dysphagia management.

A Toddler Parenting Intervention in Primary Care for Caregivers With Depression Symptoms.

Caregiver depression impacts parenting behaviors and has deleterious effects on child behavior. Evidence-based interventions to address parenting have not been adapted for use with depressed caregivers in pediatric primary care settings. Our study examined the feasibility and explored outcomes of an evidence-based parenting program implemented in primary care and adapted for caregivers with depressive symptoms caring for toddlers. We conducted a randomized controlled trial with a wait-list control. Participants were caregivers who screened positive for depressive symptoms in pediatric settings with a toddler. Our study was implemented from July 2011 to June 2012. We adapted the Incredible Years Parents, Babies and Toddlers program with the addition of depression psychoeducation (12 weekly sessions), and assessed caregivers at baseline and immediately post-intervention. We assessed participation rates, depressive symptoms, parenting discipline practices, social support, and parenting stress. Our results revealed that 32 caregivers participating in the intervention group had significantly greater improvement in self-reported parenting discipline practices compared to the 29 wait-list control group caregivers. We found no differences between groups in depressive symptoms, social support, or parenting stress. Our study demonstrated that the average attendance was poor (mean attendance = 3.7 sessions). We adapted an evidence-based parenting intervention for caregivers with depressive symptoms and toddlers in primary care; however, participation was challenging. Alternative intervention strategies are needed to reach and retain low-income caregivers with depression symptoms as they face multiple barriers to participation in groups within center-based services. Trial Registration Clinical Trials.gov identifier NCT01464619.

Screening for Parental Depression in Urban Primary Care Practices: A Mixed Methods Study.

We sought to determine feasibility and acceptability of parental depression screening in urban pediatric practices. We recruited seven practices to participate. Patient Health Questionnaire-2, a validated two-item screening tool, was used to screen for depressive symptoms at 1-3 year old well visits. We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians to identify barriers and facilitators to screening. Of 8,621 eligible parents, 21.1% completed screening with site-specific rates ranging from 10.1% to 48.5%. Among those screened, 8.1% screened positive for depressive symptoms with site-specific rates ranging from 1.2% to 16.9%. Electronic alerts improved screening rates from 45 / month to 170 / month. Fifteen clinicians completed interviews and endorsed screening to provide help for families, build stronger ties with parents, and improve outcomes for children. However, insufficient time, need to complete activities with higher priority, lack of mental health availability, few resources for parents with limited English proficiency, and discomfort addressing depression were thought to limit screening.

Patient navigation to facilitate early intervention referral completion among poor urban children.

INTRODUCTION: Few eligible children participate in early intervention (EI) programs. The objective of this study was to determine feasibility and outcomes of a novel patient navigation program on EI referrals among a diverse group of at-risk children. METHODS: During a 6-month period, a patient navigator was assigned to an urban pediatric clinic to engage families, provide education on early child development and EI, and assist families with completing multidisciplinary evaluations. Families were eligible to participate if they spoke English, had a child <34 months old with a suspected developmental delay, and were referred to EI for evaluation. Families completed measures of demographics, language preference, and the Newest Vital Sign, a validated literacy measure. Outcomes on completion of EI referrals were obtained from the county EI provider. RESULTS: Of 88 EI referrals during the study period, 53 patients were eligible and enrolled. Patients were predominantly male, racially diverse, on public health insurance, with a mean age of 18.4 months. Most caregivers of patients had less than a high school education, spoke a non-English language at home, and had limited literacy. Forty-two families (79.2%) completed a referral, and 34 (81.0%) of those were eligible for EI services. There were no significant differences in demographic, language, or literacy measures between those who completed and did not complete EI referrals. DISCUSSION: A patient navigation program to facilitate EI referrals was feasible in a diverse urban patient population. Preliminary results of the patient navigation program on EI referral completion were promising and warrant further study. (PsycINFO Database Record