Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 9(4): 1216-26, 2012 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22690192

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The Philadelphia Lead Safe Homes (LSH) Study was designed to evaluate whether educational and environmental interventions in the first year of life for families of newborns increased knowledge of lead exposure prevention and were associated with less elevation of blood lead levels (BLLs) for these children, when compared to children receiving standard care. METHODS: The current study performed descriptive statistics on the second-year BLL data for both groups and compared these using chi-square tests for proportions and unpaired t-tests for means. RESULTS: A BLL result was found for 159 (50.6%) of the 314 LSH cohort children and 331 (52.7%) of the 628 control children (p = 0.1). Mean and standard deviation for age at draw was 23.8 (3.4) months versus 23.6 (3.1) months (P = 0.6). Geometric mean BLLs were 3.7 versus 3.5 µg/dL (P = 0.4). The percentages of the cohort group with a BLL of ≥ 20, ≥ 10 and ≥ 5 µg/dL, respectively, were 0.6%, 5% and 30%; for the controls 1.2%, 6.6%, and 25%. These percentages were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: A comparison of geometric mean BLLs and percentages above several BLL cut points drawn at age two years in a group of urban newborns benefitting from study interventions versus a group of similar urban children did not yield statistically significant differences. Both groups had relatively lower lead levels when compared to historical cohort groups, which may reflect a continuing downward trend in BLLs in U.S. children. The interventions did result in benefits to the families such as an increase in parental knowledge about lead exposure prevention and in-home wet cleaning activity, and a decrease in lead dust levels in study homes.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Environmental Pollutants/blood , Health Education , Health Promotion , Lead/blood , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Environmental Monitoring , Humans , Philadelphia , Primary Prevention
2.
Public Health Rep ; 126 Suppl 1: 76-88, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21563715

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Lead exposure in children can lead to neuropsychological impairment. This study tested whether primary prevention interventions in the newborn period prevent elevated blood lead levels (BLLs). METHODS: The Philadelphia Lead Safe Homes (LSH) Study offered parental education, home evaluation, and lead remediation to the families of urban newborns. Households were randomized to a standard lead education group or maintenance education group. We conducted home visits at baseline, six months, and 12 months. To compare BLLs, we identified a matched comparison group. RESULTS: We enrolled and randomized 314 newborns in the intervention component; 110 completed the study. There were few significant differences between the randomized groups. In the combined intervention groups, positive results on visual inspection declined from baseline to 12 months (97.0% to 90.6%, p = 0.007). At baseline, 36.9% of homes were above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's lead dust standard, compared with 26.9% at 12 months (p = 0.032), mainly due to a drop in windowsill dust levels. Both groups showed a significant increase in parental scores on a lead education test. Children in the intervention and matched control groups had similar geometric mean initial BLLs (2.6 vs. 2.7, p = 0.477), but a significantly higher percentage of children in the intervention group had an initial blood lead screening compared with those in the matched group (88.9% vs. 84.4%, p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: A study of primary prevention of lead exposure showed a higher blood lead screening rate for the combined intervention groups and mean BLLs at one year of age not statistically different from the comparison group. Most homes had lead hazards. Lead education significantly increased knowledge.


Subject(s)
Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Housing/standards , Lead Poisoning/prevention & control , Primary Prevention/methods , Child, Preschool , Female , Household Work/methods , Household Work/standards , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Lead/blood , Lead Poisoning/blood , Male , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Parents/education , Philadelphia , Poverty Areas , Urban Health
3.
Policy Polit Nurs Pract ; 7(3): 216-26, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17071708

ABSTRACT

A national survey showed that most insurance companies refuse to credential nurse practitioners as primary care providers in nurse-managed health centers. These prohibitive policies, along with weak federal and state laws, threaten the long-term sustainability of nurse-managed health centers as safety-net health care providers and limit the ability for nurse practitioners to become an accepted primary health care source in the United States. Interviews with national managed care organizations revealed that these companies' current business practice and policies are unlikely to change without regulatory change at state and/or federal levels.


Subject(s)
Credentialing , Insurance, Nursing Services , Managed Care Programs/organization & administration , Nurse Practitioners , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Contract Services/organization & administration , Government Regulation , Health Care Surveys , Health Policy , Humans , Professional Autonomy , United States
4.
Nurs Econ ; 24(4): 204-11, 175, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16967891

ABSTRACT

A national survey shows that most insurance companies refuse to credential nurse practitioners in nurse-managed health centers as primary care providers. These prohibitive policies along with weak federal and state laws threaten the long-term sustainability of nurse-managed health centers as safety net health care providers, and the ability for nurse practitioners to become an accepted primary health care source in the United States.


Subject(s)
Choice Behavior , Health Maintenance Organizations/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Insurance, Health/standards , Nurse Practitioners/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Attitude to Health , Community Health Centers/organization & administration , Credentialing/organization & administration , Health Services Research , Humans , Insurance Coverage/organization & administration , Insurance, Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Licensure, Nursing , Medicaid/organization & administration , Medically Underserved Area , Medicare/organization & administration , Nurse's Role , Nursing Administration Research , Organizational Policy , Professional Autonomy , Reimbursement Mechanisms/organization & administration , United States
5.
J Cult Divers ; 12(4): 145-51, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16479841

ABSTRACT

Temple Health Connection exemplifies the education, research, and service missions of the university through the provision of culturally competent and effective primary health care. This article reports on the history and successes of a community-based, community-driven academic nursing center at Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Pender's Health Promotion Model has been used to guide the design of interventions, and theoretical propositions are related to community programs and projects. Demographic characteristics of the population served and statistics on both primary care and community outreach efforts are presented. Collaborative efforts are framed in terms of successful funding and programming initiatives.


Subject(s)
Community Health Services/organization & administration , Community-Institutional Relations , Education, Nursing/organization & administration , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Humans , Models, Organizational , Needs Assessment , Pennsylvania , Program Evaluation
6.
Am J Public Health ; 92(5): 739-41, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11988438

ABSTRACT

Lead poisoning in children has been associated with reduced intelligence, shortened memory, slowed reaction times, poor hand-eye coordination, and antisocial behavior. The cost to society includes not only medical treatment and special education but also higher high-school drop-out rates, which are associated with crime and low earning potential.


Subject(s)
Community Health Planning/organization & administration , Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Health Education/organization & administration , Housing/standards , Lead Poisoning/prevention & control , Social Welfare/ethnology , Urban Health , Adult , Child , Community Participation , Dust/adverse effects , Dust/analysis , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Lead/blood , Lead Poisoning/ethnology , Paint/adverse effects , Philadelphia , Poverty Areas
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...