Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
2.
Basic Clin Androl ; 28: 13, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30397480

ABSTRACT

On the occasion of the XIIIth International Symposium on Spermatology held from 9 to 13 May 2018 in Stockholm (Sweden), participants (guest speakers and audience) collectively felt the need to make a public statement on the general issue of male reproductive health. Our intention is to raise awareness of what we believe is a neglected area of research despite alarming situations around the world. The disclosure strategy desired by the co-authors is to bring it to the attention of the greatest number partly by considering co-publication in the various periodicals dealing with Reproductive Biology and Andrology. BaCA's editorial office accepted this mission and found it natural that our periodical, the official journal of the French Andrology Society (SALF), should carry this message.


A l'occasion du XIII eme Symposium international sur la Spermatologie qui s'est. tenu du 9 au 13 Mai 2018 à Stockholm (Suède), les participants (orateurs invités et l'auditoire) ont ressenti collectivement le besoin de faire une déclaration publique sur la question générale de la santé reproductive masculine. Notre intention est. de mieux faire connaître ce que nous pensons être un domaine de recherche négligé malgré des situations alarmantes dans le monde entier. La stratégie de divulgation souhaitée par les co-auteurs est. de le porter à l'attention du plus grand nombre en envisageant pour partie une co-publication dans les différents périodiques traitant de Reproduction et d'Andrologie. Le bureau éditorial de BaCA, a accepté cette mission et a trouvé naturel que notre périodique, journal officiel de la Société d'Andrologie en Langue Française (SALF) porte ce message.

3.
Methods Mol Biol ; 927: 27-37, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22992901

ABSTRACT

Sperm morphology is an important measure of testicular health, spermiation, and fertility potential. The World Health Organization (WHO) Semen Manuals advocate different sperm morphology schemes, but, like the schemes themselves, do not describe classification sequence or rules that can be unambiguously applied in a standard method. Our novel dichotomous key provides a rational decision framework for a sperm morphology classification algorithm. Classification order hierarchy is standardized and sperm characteristics are defined. Normal morphology is derived after eliminating abnormal and borderline normal forms. By defining and categorizing borderline normal forms separately from either normal or abnormal, the method can simultaneously produce results for Strict and traditional morphology schemes as adopted by different versions of the WHO Semen Manuals. The algorithm can be used for "recalibration" to a less stringent and potentially more relevant standard of normal, while reducing shift, drift, and variation in classification within and among analysts.


Subject(s)
Semen Analysis/methods , Semen Analysis/standards , Spermatozoa/cytology , Algorithms , Humans , Male , Spermatozoa/classification , World Health Organization
4.
MLO Med Lab Obs ; 39(4): 18-20, 22-7; quiz 28-9, 2007 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17494543

ABSTRACT

At the heart of better semen analysis is professionalism. The walls of many labs are covered with slogans like, "at the end of every test is a worried patient who needs an answer". Semen analysis is no different. At its end is a couple desperate to have a child or start a family. In spite of the importance of semen analysis in fertility diagnosis and treatment, it remains in most clinical laboratories "the neglected laboratory test". The tips and recommendations in this article should help any lab improve the quality of semen analysis while reducing the effort required to produce better results. Knowledge and simple, repeatable procedures, combined with QC and competency benchmarks, can put the interest and satisfaction back into a test that is the gateway for fertility treatment. After all, what is not to love about a cell that swims and comes in so many interesting shapes?


Subject(s)
Semen , Sperm Count/methods , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Education, Continuing , Humans , Male , Spermatozoa/growth & development , Spermatozoa/physiology , United States
5.
J Androl ; 24(6): 853-61, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14581511

ABSTRACT

Collection of ejaculated semen at a remote site (outside of the laboratory) would facilitate participation rates and geographic diversity in reproductive epidemiology studies. Our study addressed concerns that remote collection and overnight mail return might induce chromosome/DNA damage. We collected semen from 10 healthy men. Part of each sample was snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and the rest held at 22 +/- 1 degrees C for 24 hours in a transport container (simulating ambient temperature during overnight return) then snap frozen. DNA breakage and fragmentation were measured using tandem-label sperm-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end-labeling (TUNEL), and neutral comet assay. Tandem-label sperm-FISH and TUNEL detected no statistically significant difference between sperm fresh frozen (FF) and those frozen after 24 hours (F24). The mean frequency of chromosome breakage per 10 000 cells scored in sperm-FISH for FF and F24 was 10.5 +/- 1.3 breaks and 11.2 +/- 1.1 breaks, respectively (P =.69, Student's t test). The mean frequency of TUNEL-positive cells per 2000 cells scored in FF and F24 was 136 +/- 29 and 213 +/- 28 cells, respectively, which approached but did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.07, Student's t test). The neutral comet assay detected a statistically significant difference in DNA strand breakage between the 2 groups (percentage of DNA in the tail P = 0.037; tail moment P = 0.006; and tail length P = 0.033, all Student's t test). The mean frequency of damage denoted by tail length in micro m per 100 cells scored in FF and F24 was 175.0 +/- 15.5 and 152.2 +/- 17.6 micro m, respectively. Tandem-label sperm-FISH, TUNEL, and neutral comet assay are useful analytical techniques for laboratory-based studies of human sperm genomic integrity; however, for field studies incorporating the nonrefrigerated return of semen after 24 hours, only chromosome breakage at a level that can be detected using tandem-label sperm-FISH was unaffected. TUNEL and neutral comet assay need further study before they are used in specimens collected at remote sites and transported to a central laboratory.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Breakage , DNA Damage , Semen , Specimen Handling/methods , Spermatozoa/physiology , Comet Assay , Cryopreservation , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , In Situ Nick-End Labeling , Male , Reference Values , Semen Preservation , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...