An analysis of postpartum walking balance and the correlations to anthropometry.

BACKGROUND: Falls caused by balance issues during pregnancy are quite common, and these issues can continue postpartum, potentially posing a danger to both the mother and baby. While there has been research on changes to walking gait during pregnancy, walking balance in the postpartum period has yet to be examined. Therefore, the aims of this study were to examine if balance changes persist in postpartum and the contribution of anthropometry changes. METHODS: This was done through longitudinal observational cohort study at 16 and 40 weeks gestation and at four-week intervals postpartum. Balance was measured as lateral center of mass motion during treadmill walking, and recorded with motion capture cameras following anthropometric measurements. Balance variables were statistically analyzed to observe how they changed over time. Hierarchical regression analyses determined correlations between balance and anthropometry. RESULTS: Balance was observed to improve significantly just following birth. Additionally, there were changes that continued to indicate improvement throughout the postpartum period. Anthropometry changes were significantly, but minimally, correlated with balance changes. SIGNIFICANCE: Many women begin to return to normal activities soon after birth. With women participating in various forms of exercise, potentially rigorous work requirements, and tasks around the home, it is important that they, their medical providers, and employers understand and consider the continued risks of imbalance.

Anthropometry, standing posture, and body center of mass changes up to 28 weeks postpartum in Caucasians in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Anthropometric models are used when body center of mass motion is calculated for assessment of dynamic balance. It is currently unknown how body segments and posture change in the postpartum period. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the longitudinal changes in anthropometry, center of mass, and standing posture postpartum. METHODS: Seventeen pregnant women were tested at nine different times: 16-20 weeks and 36-40 weeks gestation, and then in 4-week intervals from childbirth to 28 weeks postpartum. Anthropometry was measured and then participants conducted a static standing and static laying trial. Force plate data and motion capture data were used in combination with anthropometry to calculate the masses of individual segments and the body center of mass. Change over time was determined through a linear mixed model analysis. RESULTS: Anthropometric changes related to the abdomen or fluid retention during pregnancy immediately regress to early pregnancy levels following childbirth. However, other changes related to breast tissue and fat deposits persist postpartum. As such, masses of different segments affect an anthropometric model for center of mass calculation, and body center of mass changes in the lateral and anterior directions postpartum. Vertical body center of mass position was unaffected. SIGNIFICANCE: Increased postpartum breast mass may be the cause of persistent lordotic curvature changes in the lumbar spine. There is potential that this affects postpartum back pain. Future research should explore how body center of mass changes postpartum for individuals that do not breast feed, and thus may not have significant breast mass postpartum.

Improving Quality and Safety through Positive Patient Identification.

The World Health Organization recognizes that patient misidentification can contribute to medication, surgical and charting errors. Accreditation Canada has set national standards and the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has listed patient identification as a national patient safety goal. A qualitative and observational evaluation of patient identification practices in the Pre-Admission Clinic, Admitting Department and the Perioperative Care Center uncovered confusion, with 90% (n = 55) of patient verification occurrences not matching current policies. These discrepancies identify an opportunity to reassess and standardize workflow, clarify what identification methods are acceptable and determine additional appropriate identification verification practices with ID bracelets and patient charts.

Comparing two anesthesia information management system user interfaces: a usability evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: Anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) have been developed by multiple vendors and are deployed in thousands of operating rooms around the world, yet not much is known about measuring and improving AIMS usability. We developed a methodology for evaluating AIMS usability in a low-fidelity simulated clinical environment and used it to compare an existing user interface with a revised version. We hypothesized that the revised user interface would be more useable. METHODS: In a low-fidelity simulated clinical environment, twenty anesthesia providers documented essential anesthetic information for the start of the case using both an existing and a revised user interface. Participants had not used the revised user interface previously and completed a brief training exercise prior to the study task. All participants completed a workload assessment and a satisfaction survey. All sessions were recorded. Multiple usability metrics were measured. The primary outcome was documentation accuracy. Secondary outcomes were perceived workload, number of documentation steps, number of user interactions, and documentation time. The interfaces were compared and design problems were identified by analyzing recorded sessions and survey results. RESULTS: Use of the revised user interface was shown to improve documentation accuracy from 85.1% to 92.4%, a difference of 7.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference 1.8 to 12.7). The revised user interface decreased the number of user interactions by 6.5 for intravenous documentation (95% CI 2.9 to 10.1) and by 16.1 for airway documentation (95% CI 11.1 to 21.1). The revised user interface required 3.8 fewer documentation steps (95% CI 2.3 to 5.4). Airway documentation time was reduced by 30.5 seconds with the revised workflow (95% CI 8.5 to 52.4). There were no significant time differences noted in intravenous documentation or in total task time. No difference in perceived workload was found between the user interfaces. Two user interface design problems were identified in the revised user interface. DISCUSSION: The usability of anesthesia information management systems can be evaluated using a low-fidelity simulated clinical environment. User testing of the revised user interface showed improvement in some usability metrics and highlighted areas for further revision. Vendors of AIMS and those who use them should consider adopting methods to evaluate and improve AIMS usability.

Resistin worsens cardiac ischaemia-reperfusion injury.

We provide the first report of direct effects of resistin upon haemodynamic and neurohumoral parameters in isolated perfused rat heart preparations. Pre-conditioning with 1 nmol L-1 recombinant human resistin prior to ischaemia significantly impaired contractile recovery during reperfusion, compared with vehicle-infused hearts (P<0.05, n=12). This was accompanied by a significant increase in both A-type and B-type natriuretic peptides (P<0.05, n=12 both ANP and BNP vs vehicle), creatine kinase, and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) release in resistin-infused hearts. Resistin had no significant effect on myocardial glucose uptake. Co-infusion of resistin with Bay 11 7082 (an NF-kappaB inhibitor) improved contractile recovery following ischaemia and reduced both natriuretic peptide and creatine kinase release. This is the first evidence indicating resistin impairs cardiac recovery following ischaemia, stimulates cardiac TNF-alpha secretion, and modulates reperfusion release of natriuretic peptides and biochemical markers of myocardial damage. A TNF-alpha signalling related mechanism is suggested as one component underlying these effects.

Cardiovascular changes and catecholamine release following anaesthesia in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and snapper (Pagrus auratus).

We investigated recovery from anaesthesia in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) with and without surgery. Fish either underwent light sedation on exposure to 60 ppm AQUI-S or surgical depth anaesthesia with 120 ppm AQUI-S. Surgical depth anaesthesia experiments were replicated using New Zealand snapper (Pagrus auratus). During light sedation, there was no evidence of catecholamine release in salmon despite changes in heart rate and blood pressure. Following surgical anaesthesia both salmon and snapper released high concentrations of catecholamines into the circulation. Plasma half-life of adrenaline in salmon was 9.3+/-0.7 min (n = 7) and in snapper was 4.4+/-3.3 min (n = 7). There was no further release of catecholamines, despite attempts by both species to escape their enclosures. Though clearance of the catecholamines was rapid, the cardiovascular effects of anaesthesia were prolonged. Dorsal aortic blood pressure (P(DA)) and heart rate (HR) were high following anaesthesia, falling by 60 min in the 60 ppm exposed salmon but remaining high in the 120 ppm group. Following anaesthesia ventral aorta blood pressure (P(VA)) in snapper was positively correlated with HR, as was P(DA) and haematocrit in salmon. Recovery of cardiovascular control processes is prolonged in recovery from anaesthesia if the fish become hypoxic.