First Report of Pseudomonas Grapevine Bunch Rot Caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae.

Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, a Gammaproteobacterium belonging to genomospecies 2 within the P. syringae complex, is distributed worldwide, and it is responsible for bacterial canker on >100 different hosts, including the grapevine. P. syringae pv. syringae induces necrotic lesions in the leaf blades, veins, petioles, shoots, rachis, and tendrils on grapevine cultivars in different areas. P. syringae pv. syringae has been associated with severe economic losses in different grape cultivars in Australia, where it causes inflorescence rot. In midsummer to late summer 2017, symptoms of berry rots differing from those caused by the common berry rots agents were observed in different cultivar Red Globe vineyards of Apulia (southern Italy). As proven by fulfillment of Koch's postulates, these symptoms were caused by a bacterium that, according to the results of biochemical, physiological, nutritional, antimicrobial activity, and pathogenicity tests and sequencing of 16S ribosomal DNA, gyrB, rpoB, and rpoD genes, was identified as P. syringae pv. syringae. This is the first report of Pseudomonas grapevine bunch rot.

Characterization of Monilinia spp. Populations on Stone Fruit in South Italy.

Monilinia spp. are responsible for brown rot decay of stone and pome fruit in the field as well as in postharvest. Monilinia laxa and M. fructigena are considered indigenous to Europe, while M. fructicola is a quarantine pathogen in the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization area included in the A2 List. In Italy, it was first reported in 2009 in Piedmont (northern Italy) and rapidly spread to central Italy. We carried out a monitoring program on the occurrence of Monilinia spp. in southern Italy and a comparative characterization of the three main fungal pathogens. Molecular assays based on direct polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and real-time quantitative PCR for molecular identification of Monilinia spp. from rotted fruit were set up, validated, and applied in a monitoring program. Of the tested 519 isolates from 26 orchards, 388 (74.8%) were identified as M. fructicola, 118 (22.7%) as M. laxa, 10 (1.9%) as M. fructigena, and 3 (0.6%) were M. polystroma. M. fructicola colonies grew faster and had a higher optimal temperature for growth (26°C) than M. laxa (23°C) and M. fructigena (20°C). No relevant difference in virulence could be observed on artificially inoculated apricot, cherry, and peach fruit. The fungal species showed different responses to fungicides, because M. fructicola was more sensitive than M. laxa, especially to cyflufenamid, and M. fructigena revealed a lower sensitivity to succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (boscalid, fluopyram, and fluxapyroxad) and quinone outside inhibitors (mandestrobin). In summary, the two species M. fructicola and M. polystroma were first detected in southern Italy where M. fructicola has largely displaced the two indigenous pathogens M. laxa and M. fructigena; the relative proportions of the three pathogens in orchards should be considered when defining the management of brown rot of stone fruit due to differences in their responses to fungicides.

Efficacy and Safety of Nifedipine Coat-Core versus Amlodipine in Patients With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension: Comparison of 24-Hour Mean Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure.

BACKGROUND: Calcium channel blockers have been successfully used for the treatment of hypertension. In this study, the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of the dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers nifedipine coat-core 30 mg and amlodipine 5 mg were evaluated. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, prospective, randomized, parallel-arm study compared once daily administration of nifedipine coat-core 30 mg with once daily amlodipine 5 mg in subjects with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. A 4-week placebo run-in period was followed by an 8-week active treatment period. Blood pressure reduction was measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and casual office blood pressure measured by mercury sphygmomanometer. RESULTS: Nifedipine coat-core and amlodipine produced equivalent reductions in mean diastolic blood pressure, as determined by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Mean reduction in diastolic blood pressure was 5.4 mmHg and 5.8 mmHg for nifedipine coat-core and amlodipine, respectively. Both drugs were well tolerated and neither treatment resulted in a significant change in heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: Nifedipine coat-core 30 mg once-daily is comparable to amlodipine 5 mg once-daily for blood pressure reduction.