Association between Group B Streptococcus and clinical chorioamnionitis by gestational week at delivery- a multicenter cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: In the era of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP), GBS colonization has been associated with a lower risk of chorioamnionitis, possibly due to a protective effect of IAP. We sought to confirm this finding and assess whether this association varies by gestational week at delivery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of term (37.0-42.6 weeks), singleton parturients with known GBS status who delivered from 2005-2021 at two academic medical centers in Israel. We excluded patients who underwent planned cesarean, out of hospital birth, or had a fetal demise. Patients received GBS screening and IAP for GBS positivity as routine clinical care. The primary outcome was a diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis as determined by ICD-10 code, compared between GBS positive and negative groups, and assessed by gestational week at delivery. RESULTS: Of 292,126 deliveries, 155,255 met inclusion criteria. 30.1% were GBS positive and 69.9% were negative. GBS positive patients were 21% less likely to be diagnosed with clinical chorioamnionitis than GBS negative patients, even after controlling for confounders (1.5% vs. 2.2%, aOR 0.79, 95%CI [0.68-0.92]). When assessed by gestational week at delivery, there was a significantly greater difference in rates of clinical chorioamnionitis between GBS positive vs. GBS negative groups with advancing gestational age: 1.5 fold difference at 38-40 weeks, but a 2-fold difference at 42 weeks. The risk of clinical chorioamnionitis remained stable in the GBS positive group, but increased significantly in the GBS negative group at 41 and 42 weeks gestation (2.0% vs. 2.9%, p<0.01 at 41 weeks; up to 3.9% at 42 weeks, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: In a large multicenter cohort with universal GBS screening and IAP, GBS positivity was associated with a lower risk of chorioamnionitis, driven by an increasing rate of chorioamnionitis among GBS negative patients after 40 weeks.

Labor Induction in Women with Isolated Polyhydramnios at Term: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Background: With the increasing popularity of elective induction after 39 + 0 weeks, the question of whether induction of labor (IOL) is safe in women with isolated polyhydramnios has become more relevant. We aimed to evaluate the pregnancy outcomes associated with IOL among women with and without isolated polyhydramnios. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort that included women who underwent induction of labor at term. The study compared women who underwent IOL due to isolated polyhydramnios to low-risk women who underwent elective IOL due to gestational age only. The main outcome measure was a composite adverse maternal outcome, while the secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal adverse pregnancy outcomes. Results: During the study period, 1004 women underwent IOL at term and met inclusion and exclusion criteria; 162 had isolated polyhydramnios, and 842 had a normal amount of amniotic fluid. Women who had isolated polyhydramnios had higher rates of the composite adverse maternal outcome (28.7% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.02), prolonged hospital stay, perineal tear grade 3/4, postpartum hemorrhage, and neonatal hypoglycemia. Multivariate analyses revealed that among women with IOL, polyhydramnios was significantly associated with adverse composite maternal outcome [aOR 1.98 (1.27-3.10), p < 0.01]. Conclusions: IOL in women with isolated polyhydramnios at term was associated with worse perinatal outcomes compared to low-risk women who underwent elective IOL. Our findings suggest that the management of women with polyhydramnios cannot be extrapolated from studies of low-risk populations and that clinical decision-making should take into account the individual patient's risk factors and preferences.

Induction of labor in term pregnancies with isolated polyhydramnios: Is it beneficial or harmful?

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes in term pregnancies complicated by polyhydramnios between women who had induction of labor (IOB) versus women who had expectant management. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included term pregnancies complicated by isolated polyhydramnios. Patients who underwent IOB were compared with those who had expectant management. The primary outcome was defined as a composite adverse maternal outcome, and secondary outcomes were various maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. Univariate analyses were followed by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 865 pregnancies with term isolated polyhydramnios were included: 169 patients underwent IOB (19.5%), while 696 had expectant management and developed spontaneous onset of labor (80.5%). Women who underwent IOB had significantly higher rates of composite adverse maternal outcome (23.1% vs 9.8%, P < 0.01), prolonged hospital stay, perineal tear grade 3/4, intrapartum cesarean, postpartum hemorrhage, blood products transfusion, and neonatal asphyxia compared with expectant management. While the perinatal fetal death rate was similar between the groups (0.6% vs 0.6%, P = 0.98), the timing of the loss was different. Four women in the expectant management group had a stillbirth, while in the induction group one case of intrapartum fetal death occurred due to uterine rupture. Multivariate analyses revealed that IOB was associated with a higher rate of composite adverse maternal outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.28-3.83]; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: IOB in women with term isolated polyhydramnios is associated with higher rates of adverse maternal outcomes in comparison to expectant management. Further research is needed to determine the optimal approach for the management of isolated polyhydramnios at term.

The association between unintended hysterotomy extensions with cesarean delivery and subsequent preterm birth.

BACKGROUND: An increased risk for preterm birth has been observed among individuals with a previous second stage cesarean delivery when compared with those with a previous vaginal delivery. One mechanism that may contribute to the increased risk for preterm birth following a second stage cesarean delivery is the increased risk for cervical injury because of extension of the uterine incision (hysterotomy) into the cervix. The contribution of hysterotomy extension to the rate of preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy has not been investigated and may shed light on the mechanism underlying the observed relationship between the mode of delivery and subsequent preterm birth. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify the association between unintended hysterotomy extension and preterm birth in a subsequent delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study using electronic perinatal data collected from 2 university-affiliated obstetrical centers. The study included patients with a primary cesarean delivery of a term, singleton live birth and a subsequent singleton birth in the same catchment (2005-2021). The primary outcome was subsequent preterm birth <37 weeks' gestation; secondary outcomes included subsequent preterm birth at <34, <32, and <28 weeks' gestation. We assessed crude and adjusted associations between unintended hysterotomy extensions and subsequent preterm birth with log binomial regression models using rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Adjusted models included several characteristics of the primary cesarean delivery such as maternal age, length of active labor, indication for cesarean delivery, chorioamnionitis, and maternal comorbidity. RESULTS: A total 4797 patients met the study inclusion criteria. The overall rate of unintended hysterotomy extension in the primary cesarean delivery was 6.0% and the total rate of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy was 4.8%. Patients with an unintended hysterotomy extension were more likely to have a longer duration of active labor, chorioamnionitis, failed vacuum delivery attempt, second stage cesarean delivery, and persistent occiput posterior position of the fetal head in the primary cesarean delivery and higher rates of smoking in the subsequent pregnancy. Multivariable analyses that controlled for several confounders showed that a history of hysterotomy extension was not associated with a higher risk for preterm birth <37 weeks' gestation (adjusted rate ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-2.47), but it was associated with preterm birth <34 weeks' gestation (adjusted rate ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-5.42). CONCLUSION: Patients with a uterine incision extension have a 2.5 times higher rate of preterm birth <34 weeks' gestation when compared with patients who did not have this injury. This association was not observed for preterm birth <37 weeks' gestation. Future research should aim to replicate our analyses with incorporation of additional data to minimize the potential for residual confounding.

Trial of labor after 2 previous cesareans: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Trial of labor after cesarean after 2 cesarean deliveries is linked to a lower success rate of vaginal delivery and higher rates of adverse obstetrical outcomes than trial of labor after cesarean after 1 previous cesarean delivery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the factors associated with failed trial of labor after cesarean among women with 2 previous cesarean deliveries. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study, which included all women with singleton pregnancies attempting trial of labor after cesarean after 2 previous cesarean deliveries between 2003 and 2021. This study compared labor, maternal, and neonatal characteristics between women with failed trial of labor after cesarean and those with successful trial of labor after cesarean. Univariate analysis was initially performed, followed by multivariable analysis (adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals). RESULTS: The study included a total of 1181 women attempting trial of labor after cesarean after 2 previous cesarean deliveries. Among these cases, vaginal birth after cesarean was achieved in 973 women (82.4%). Women with failed trial of labor after cesarean had higher rates of maternal and neonatal morbidities. Several factors were found to be associated with failed trial of labor after cesarean, including longer interpregnancy and interdelivery intervals, lower gravidity and parity, lower rates of previous successful vaginal delivery, smoking, earlier gestational age at delivery (38.3±2.1 vs 39.5±1.3 weeks), late preterm delivery (34-37 weeks of gestation), lower cervical dilation on admission, no use of epidural, and smaller neonatal birthweight. Our multivariable model revealed that late preterm delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 3.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-10.47) and cervical dilation on admission for labor <3 cm (adjusted odds ratio, 2.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-4.54) were associated with higher odds of failed trial of labor after cesarean. CONCLUSION: In the investigated population of women with 2 previous cesarean deliveries undergoing trial of labor after cesarean, admission at the late preterm period with a cervical dilation of <3 cm, which reflects the latent phase, may elevate the risk of failed trial of labor after cesarean and a repeated intrapartum cesarean delivery.

The association between discordant umbilical arterial resistance in growth-restricted fetuses and adverse outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Assessing the umbilical artery pulsatility index via Doppler measurements plays a crucial role in evaluating fetal growth impairment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate perinatal outcomes associated with discordant pulsatility indices of umbilical arteries in fetuses with growth restriction. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, all singleton pregnancies were included if their estimated fetal weight and/or abdominal circumference fell below the 10th percentile for gestational age (2017-2022). Eligible cases included singleton pregnancies with concurrent sampling of both umbilical arteries within 14 days of birth at the ultrasound evaluation closest to delivery. The exclusion criteria included births before 22 weeks of gestation, evidence of absent or reverse end-diastolic flow in either umbilical artery, and known fetal genetic or structural anomalies. The study compared cases with discordant umbilical artery pulsatility index values (defined as 1 umbilical artery pulsatility index at ≤95th percentile and the other umbilical artery pulsatility index at >95th percentile for gestational age) to pregnancies where both umbilical artery pulsatility indices had normal pulsatility index values and those with both umbilical arteries displaying abnormal pulsatility index values. The primary outcome assessed was the occurrence of composite adverse neonatal outcomes. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed, adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS: The study encompassed 1014 patients, including 194 patients (19.1%) with discordant umbilical artery pulsatility index values among those who had both umbilical arteries sampled close to delivery, 671 patients (66.2%) with both umbilical arteries having normal pulsatility index values, and 149 patients (14.7%) with both umbilical arteries exhibiting abnormal values. Pregnancies with discordant umbilical artery pulsatility index values displayed compromised sonographic parameters compared with those with both umbilical arteries showing normal pulsatility index values. Similarly, the number of abnormal umbilical artery pulsatility index values was associated with adverse perinatal outcomes in a dose-response manner. Cases with 1 abnormal (discordant) umbilical artery pulsatility index value showed favorable sonographic parameters and perinatal outcomes compared with cases with both abnormal umbilical artery pulsatility index values, and cases with both abnormal umbilical artery pulsatility index values showed worse sonographic parameters and perinatal outcomes compared with cases with discordant UA PI values. Multivariate analysis revealed that discordant umbilical artery pulsatility indices were significantly and independently associated with composite adverse perinatal outcomes, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.75 (95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.47; P = .002). CONCLUSION: Evaluating the resistance indices of both umbilical arteries may provide useful data and assist in assessing adverse perinatal outcomes among fetuses with growth restriction.

Evaluating the validity of ChatGPT responses on common obstetric issues: Potential clinical applications and implications.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of ChatGPT responses to common issues in obstetrics and assess its ability to provide reliable responses to pregnant individuals. The study aimed to examine the responses based on expert opinions using predetermined criteria, including "accuracy," "completeness," and "safety." METHODS: We curated 15 common and potentially clinically significant questions that pregnant women are asking. Two native English-speaking women were asked to reframe the questions in their own words, and we employed the ChatGPT language model to generate responses to the questions. To evaluate the accuracy, completeness, and safety of the ChatGPT's generated responses, we developed a questionnaire with a scale of 1 to 5 that obstetrics and gynecology experts from different countries were invited to rate accordingly. The ratings were analyzed to evaluate the average level of agreement and percentage of positive ratings (≥4) for each criterion. RESULTS: Of the 42 experts invited, 20 responded to the questionnaire. The combined score for all responses yielded a mean rating of 4, with 75% of responses receiving a positive rating (≥4). While examining specific criteria, the ChatGPT responses were better for the accuracy criterion, with a mean rating of 4.2 and 80% of the questions received a positive rating. The responses scored less for the completeness criterion, with a mean rating of 3.8 and 46.7% of questions received a positive rating. For safety, the mean rating was 3.9 and 53.3% of questions received a positive rating. There was no response with an average negative rating below three. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates promising results regarding potential use of ChatGPT's in providing accurate responses to obstetric clinical questions posed by pregnant women. However, it is crucial to exercise caution when addressing inquiries concerning the safety of the fetus or the mother.

Impacted fetal head extraction methods at second stage cesarean and subsequent preterm delivery: A multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: Second-stage cesarean delivery (CD) is associated with subsequent preterm birth (PTB). It has been suggested that an increased risk of PTB after second-stage cesarean delivery could be linked to a higher chance of cervical injury due to the extension of the uterine incision. Previous studies have shown that reverse breech extraction is associated with lower rates of uterine incision extensions compared to the "push" method. We aimed to investigate the association between the method of fetal extraction during second-stage CD and the rate of spontaneous PTB (sPTB), as well as other maternal and neonatal outcomes during the subsequent pregnancy. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. The study population included women in their first subsequent singleton delivery following a second-stage CD between 2004 and 2021. The main exposure of interest was the method of fetal extraction in the index CD ("push" method vs. reverse breech extraction). The primary outcome of this study was sPTB <37 weeks in the subsequent pregnancy. Secondary outcomes were overall PTB, trial of labor, and other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: During the study period, 2969 index CD during second stage were performed, of those 583 met the inclusion criteria, of whom 234 (40.1%) had fetal extraction using the reverse breech extraction method, while 349 (59.9%) had the "push" method for extraction. In univariate analysis, women in those two groups had statistically similar rates of sPTB (3.7% vs. 3.0%; odds ratio [OR] 1.25, 95% CI: 0.49-3.19) and overall PTB (<37, <34 and <32 weeks), as well as other maternal, neonatal, and trial of labor outcomes. This was confirmed by multivariate analyses with an adjusted OR of 1.27 (95% CI: 0.43-3.71) for sPTB. CONCLUSION: Among women with a previous second-stage CD, no significant difference was observed in PTB rates in the subsequent pregnancies following the "push" method compared to the reverse breech extraction method.

Is a pregnancy following a second trimester uterine evacuation associated with increased adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies following a uterine evacuation in the second trimester, in comparison to a first trimester spontaneous pregnancy loss. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of data of women who conceived ≤6 months following a uterine evacuation due to a spontaneous pregnancy loss and subsequently delivered in a single tertiary medical center between 2016 and 2021. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between women with second trimester (14-23 weeks) and first trimester (<14 weeks) pregnancy loss. The primary outcome of this study was the preterm delivery (<37 weeks) rate. Secondary outcomes were adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression models; adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: During the study period, 1365 women met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 272 (19.9 %) women gave birth following a second trimester uterine evacuation and 1093 (80.1 %) women following a first trimester uterine evacuation. There were no demographic differences between the two groups. No difference was found in the preterm delivery rate in the subsequent pregnancy (5.1 % vs. 5.3 %, p = 0.91), further confirmed in the multivariate analysis [aOR 1.02 (0.53-1.94), p = 0.96]. No differences were identified with respect to other maternal and neonatal parameters examined, including hypertension disorders of pregnancy, third stage placental complications, mode of delivery and neonatal birth weight. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy conceived shortly after second trimester uterine evacuation as compared to first trimester, confers no additional risk for preterm delivery or other adverse perinatal outcomes. Further studies to strengthen these findings are needed.

Impact of prior use of topical hemostatic agents on trial of labor after cesarean: Insights from a multicenter cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between a topical hemostatic agent used at the time of cesarean delivery and uterine scar disruption (rupture or dehiscence) at the subsequent trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC). METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted (2005-2021). Parturients with a singleton pregnancy in whom a topical hemostatic agent was placed during the primary cesarean delivery were compared with patients in whom no such agent was placed. We assessed the uterine scar disruption rate after the subsequent TOLAC and the rate of adverse maternal outcomes. Univariate analyses were followed by multivariate analysis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]; 95% confidence interval [CI]). RESULTS: During the study period, 7199 women underwent a trial of labor and were eligible for the study; 430 (6.0%) had prior use of a hemostatic agent, 6769 (94.0%) did not. In univariate analysis, a history of topical hemostatic agent use was not found to be significantly associated with uterine scar rupture, dehiscence, or failed trial of labor. This was also confirmed on multivariate analysis for uterine rupture (aOR 1.91, 95% CI 0.66-5.54; P = 0.23), dehiscence of uterine scar (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 0.56-4.68; P = 0.37), and TOLAC failure (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79-1.48; P = 0.61). CONCLUSION: A history of hemostatic agent use is not associated with an increased risk for uterine scar disruption after subsequent TOLAC. Further prospective studies in other settings are needed to strengthen these findings.

Operative delivery in the second stage of labor and preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantify the association between mode of operative delivery in the second stage of labor (cesarean delivery vs operative vaginal delivery) and spontaneous preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, EmCare, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science: Core Collection, and Scopus were searched from database inception to April 1, 2023. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: All retrospective cohort studies with participants who had a second-stage cesarean delivery (defined as intrapartum cesarean delivery at full cervical dilation) or operative vaginal delivery (including forceps- and/or vacuum-assisted delivery) and that reported the rate of preterm birth (either spontaneous or not specified) in subsequent pregnancy were included. METHODS: Both a descriptive analysis and a meta-analysis were performed. A meta-analysis was performed for dichotomous data using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model and used the odds ratio as an effect measure with 95% confidence intervals. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's 2022 Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Exposure tool. RESULTS: After screening 2671 articles from 7 databases, a total of 18 retrospective cohort studies encompassing 605,138 patients were included. The pooled rates of spontaneous preterm birth in a subsequent pregnancy were 6.9% (12 studies) after second-stage cesarean delivery and 2.6% (8 studies) after operative vaginal delivery. A total of 7 studies encompassing 75,460 patients compared the primary outcome of spontaneous preterm birth after second-stage cesarean delivery vs operative vaginal delivery in an index pregnancy with an odds ratio of 2.01 (95% confidence interval, 1.57-2.58) in favor of operative vaginal delivery. However, most studies did not include important confounding factors, did not address exposure misclassification because of failed operative vaginal delivery, and considered operative vaginal delivery as a homogeneous category with no distinction between forceps- and vacuum-assisted deliveries. CONCLUSION: Although a synthesis of the existing literature suggests that the risk of spontaneous preterm birth is higher in those with a previous second-stage cesarean delivery than in those with operative vaginal delivery, the risk of bias in these studies is very high. Findings should be interpreted with caution.

The Correlation between Fetal Monitor Decelerations Area and Neonatal Cord pH among Preeclamptic parturient: an Automated Approach to a Clinical Challenge.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether a correlation exists between electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) in the final 120 minute prior to delivery and neonatal cord blood pH among parturients with preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of parturients with term and near-term preeclampsia who delivered at Soroka University Medical Center between 2013 and 2020 was conducted. EFM tracings, demographical data, and obstetrical outcomes were retrieved from the patients' electronic medical records. Using MATLAB program, area under the curve (AUC) measurements were applied. Correlation was calculated using the Spearman's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: EFM of 88 parturients with preeclampsia were assessed. A significant negative correlation was demonstrated between cord blood pH and the decelerations AUC, total decelerations duration, and deceleration depth. No correlation was demonstrated between area over the curve (acceleration) and cord blood pH. In a multivariate linear regression, total deceleration AUC was found independently negatively associated with cord blood pH (beta = -0.264, p = 0.011) controlling for second stage of labor duration and induction of labor. CONCLUSION: Among parturients with preeclampsia, EFM indices may assist in the diagnosis of fetal acidemia. Further studies are needed to strengthen and establish the use of electronic EFM in the management of labor and delivery. KEY POINTS: · A negative correlation was demonstrated between cord blood pH and the decelerations AUC.. · Total deceleration AUC was found independently negatively associated.. · Among parturients with preeclampsia, EFM indices may assist in the diagnosis of fetal acidemia..

The Impact of Advanced Maternal Age on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

The aim of this multicenter retrospective cohort study was to examine the impact of maternal age on perinatal outcomes in multiparas, stratified according to maternal age in one- and two-year increments. The analysis involved 302,484 multiparas who delivered between the years 2003 and 2021 in four university-affiliated obstetrics departments. Maternal age was considered both as a continuous variable and in two-year intervals, as compared with a comparison group of parturients aged 25-30 years. The study focused on cesarean delivery and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission as primary outcomes. The findings revealed that cesarean delivery rates increased as maternal age advanced, with rates ranging from 6.7% among 25-30 year olds, rising continuously from 13.5% to 19.9% between the age strata of 31 and 42, to exceeding 20% among those aged ≥ 43 years (p < 0.01 for each stratum when compared to 25-30 year old group). Similarly, NICU admission rates rose from 2.7% in the comparison group to 6% in parturients aged 45-46 years (p < 0.01 for each stratum when compared to 25-30 year old group). The study highlights the association between incrementally advanced maternal age and increased rates of maternal and neonatal complications, necessitating global awareness of these implications for family planning decisions and maternal care.

Trial of labor following cesarean in patients with bicornuate uterus: a multicenter retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether a trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) in women with a bicornuate uterus is associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity compared to women with a non-malformed uterus. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at two university-affiliated centers between 2005 and 2021. Parturients with a bicornuate uterus who attempted TOLAC following a single low-segment transverse cesarean delivery (CD) were included and compared to those with a non-malformed uterus. Failed TOLAC rates and the rate of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared using both univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Among 20,844 eligible births following CD, 125 (0.6%) were identified as having a bicornuate uterus. The overall successful vaginal delivery rate following CD in the bicornuate uterus group was 77.4%. Failed TOLAC rates were significantly higher in the bicornuate group (22.4% vs. 10.5%, p < 0.01). Uterine rupture rates did not differ between the groups, but rates of placental abruption and retained placenta were significantly higher among parturients with a bicornuate uterus (9.8% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.01, and 9.8% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.01, respectively). Neonatal outcomes following TOLAC were less favorable in the bicornuate group, particularly in terms of neonatal intensive care unit admission and neonatal sepsis. Multivariate analysis revealed an independent association between the bicornuate uterus and failed TOLAC. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that parturients with a bicornuate uterus who attempted TOLAC have a relatively high overall rate of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). However, their chances of achieving VBAC are significantly lower compared to those with a non-malformed uterus. Obstetricians should be aware of these findings when providing consultation to patients.

Failed vacuum and preterm delivery risk in the subsequent pregnancy: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Second-stage cesarean delivery is associated with subsequent preterm delivery. Failed vacuum-assisted delivery is a subgroup of second-stage cesarean delivery in which the fetal head is engaged deeper in the pelvis and, thus, is associated with an increased risk of short-term maternal complications. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of women at their subsequent delivery after a second-stage cesarean delivery with failed vacuum-assisted extraction vs after a second-stage cesarean delivery without a trial of vacuum-assisted extraction. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. The study population included all women in their subsequent pregnancy after a second-stage cesarean delivery who delivered in all university-affiliated obstetrical centers (n=4) in a single geographic area between 2003 and 2021. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of women who had second-stage cesarean delivery after a failed vacuum-assisted delivery were compared with women who had second-stage cesarean delivery without a trial of vacuum-assisted delivery. The primary outcome of this study was preterm delivery at <37 weeks of gestation. The secondary outcomes were vaginal birth rate and other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: During the study period, 1313 women met the inclusion criteria, of whom 215 (16.4%) had a history of failed vacuum-assisted delivery at the previous delivery and 1098 (83.6%) did not. In univariate analysis, women with previously failed vacuum-assisted delivery had similar preterm delivery rates (<37, <34, <32, and <28 weeks of gestation), a successful trial of labor after cesarean delivery rates, uterine rupture, and hysterectomy. However, multivariable analyses controlling for confounders showed that a history of failed vacuum-assisted delivery is associated with a higher risk of preterm delivery at <37 weeks of gestation (adjusted odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-3.79; P=.02), but not with preterm delivery at <34 or <32 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSION: Among women with a previous second-stage cesarean delivery, previously failed vacuum-assisted delivery was associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery at <37 weeks of gestation in the subsequent birth.

Association between one abnormal value on 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestation.

AIM: To investigate whether women with twin gestation and one abnormal value on the diagnostic 3-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) are at an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter study of women with twin gestation, comparing four groups: (1) normal 50-g screening, (2) normal 100-g 3-hour OGTT, (3) one abnormal value on the 3-hour OGTT, and (4) GDM. Multivariable logistic regressions adjusted for maternal age, gravidity, parity, previous CDs, fertility treatments, smoking, obesity and chorionicity were used. RESULTS: The study included 2,597 women with twin gestations, of which 79.7% had a normal screen, and 6.2% had one abnormal value on the OGTT. In adjusted analyses, women with one abnormal value were found to have higher rates of preterm delivery < 32 weeks, large for gestational age neonates, and composite neonatal morbidity of at least one fetus, however, similar maternal outcomes as those with a normal screen. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that women with twin gestation and one abnormal value on the 3-hour OGTT are at an increased risk of unfavorable neonatal outcomes. This was confirmed by multivariable logistic regressions. Further research is needed to determine whether interventions such as nutritional counseling, blood glucose monitoring, and treatment with diet and medication would improve perinatal outcomes in this population.

Short Interpregnancy Interval Following a Multifetal Pregnancy: Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with short interpregnancy intervals (IPI < 6 months) following a multifetal pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective cohort study of women with an index multifetal delivery and a subsequent singleton gestation between 2005 and 2021. The obstetrical outcomes of pregnancies following short IPI (<6 months) were compared to those with an IPI of 18-48 months. Additional analyses were also conducted for the other IPI groups: 7-17 months, and longer than 49 months, while women with an IPI of 18-48 months served as the reference group. The primary outcome was preterm birth (<37 weeks) rate. Secondary outcomes were other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 2514 women had a primary multifetal delivery with a subsequent singleton gestation at our medical centers; 160 (6.4%) had a short IPI, and 1142 (45.4%) had an optimal IPI. Women with a singleton gestation following a short IPI were younger, with lower rates of previous cesarean and fertility treatments. Women in the short IPI group had significantly higher rates of preterm birth <37 weeks, anemia (Hb < 11 gr%) on admission to the delivery room, and placental abruption. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that short IPI is associated with an increased risk for preterm birth (aOR 2.39, 95% CI 1.12-5.11, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Short IPI following a multifetal gestation is associated with an increased risk for preterm birth in subsequent singleton pregnancy.

Unintended lower-segment hysterotomy extension at cesarean delivery and the risk for uterine rupture during a subsequent trial of labor.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between unintended uterine extension in cesarean delivery and uterine scar disruption (rupture or dehiscence) at the subsequent trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC). METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study (2005-2021). Parturients with a singleton pregnancy who had unintended lower-segment uterine extension during the primary cesarean delivery (excluding T and J vertical extensions) were compared with patients who did not have an unintended uterine extension. We assessed the subsequent uterine scar disruption rate following the subsequent TOLAC and the rate of adverse maternal outcome. RESULTS: During the study period, 7199 patients underwent a trial of labor and were eligible for the study, of whom 1245 (17.3%) had a previous unintended uterine extension and 5954 (82.7%) did not. In univariate analysis, previous unintended uterine extension during the primary cesarean delivery was not significantly associated with uterine scar rupture in the following subsequent TOLAC. Nevertheless, it was associated with uterine scar dehiscence, higher rates of TOLAC failure, and a composite adverse maternal outcome. In multivariate analyses, only the association between previous unintended uterine extension and higher rates of TOLAC failure was confirmed. CONCLUSION: A history of unintended lower-segment uterine extension is not associated with an increased risk for uterine scar disruption following subsequent TOLAC.

Perinatal outcomes in nulliparous women with a history of multiple pregnancy losses according to number of previous pregnancy losses.

BACKGROUND: While it is widely acknowledged that pregnancy losses can lead to negative outcomes for both mothers and fetuses, there is limited information available on the specific levels of risk associated with each additional pregnancy loss. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of number of previous pregnancy losses among nulliparous women on maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. The study population included all nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies who delivered in all university-affiliated obstetrical centers in a single geographic area between 2003 and 2021. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of women who delivered at our medical centers and had varying numbers of previous pregnancy losses were compared with women who had no previous pregnancy loss. The primary outcome of this study was preterm delivery rate at <37 weeks of gestation. The secondary outcomes were adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was performed using multiple logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: During the study period, 97,904 nulliparous women met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of those women, 84,245 (86%) had no previous pregnancy losses (reference group), 10,724 (11%) had 1 previous pregnancy loss, 2150 (2.2%) had 2 previous pregnancy losses, 516 (0.5%) had 3 previous pregnancy losses, 160 (0.2%) had 4 previous pregnancy losses, and 99 (0.1%) had ≥5 previous pregnancy losses. Women who had previous pregnancy losses had significantly higher rates of preterm delivery, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, diabetes mellitus (pregestational and gestational), unplanned cesarean delivery, perinatal death, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, and neonatal hypoglycemia. The risks of preterm delivery and most other adverse obstetrical outcomes correlated with the number of previous pregnancy losses. Multivariate analyses showed that each previous pregnancy loss was associated with an additional, significant, increased risk of preterm delivery of 14% at <37 weeks of gestation, 37% at <34 weeks of gestation, 45% at <32 weeks of gestation, and 77% at <28 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSION: A history of previous pregnancy losses increased the risk of preterm delivery and other perinatal outcomes in a dose-dependent manner. To minimize perinatal complications, obstetricians should be aware of the risks and complications in this unique population, consider close monitoring of the cervical length, and maintain high vigilance in case of complications with special attention to other potentially modifiable risks.