Identification of biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis responsive to DMARDs but with progressive bone erosion.

Introduction: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease that may cause joint destruction and disability. The pharmacological treatment of RA aims at obtaining disease remission by effectively ceasing joint inflammation and arresting progressive bone erosions. Some patients present bone lesions accrual even after controlling joint inflammation with current therapies. Our study aimed to analyze lymphocyte subsets and levels of circulating cytokines in patients with RA with progressive bone erosions. Methods: We enrolled 20 patients with a diagnosis of RA and 12 healthy donors (HD). Patients with RA were divided into patients with bone erosions (RA-BE+) and without bone erosions (RA-BE-). Lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood were evaluated by flow cytometry. Circulating cytokines levels were evaluated by protein array. Results: The distribution of lymphocyte subsets was not able to separate HD from AR patients and RA-BE+ and RA-BE- in cluster analysis. We observed a significant expansion of CXCR5- PD1+ T peripheral helper cells (Tph cells) and a reduction in both total memory B cells and switched memory B cells in RA patients compared to HD. We observed an expansion in the frequency of total B cells in RA-BE+ patients compared to RA-BE- patients. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis of 39 cytokines resulted in a fairly good separation of HD from RA patients but not of RA-BE+ patients from RA-BE- patients. RA-BE+ patients showed significantly higher levels of IL-11 and IL-17A than RA-BE- patients. Conclusion: We show that patients with progressive erosive disease are characterized by abnormalities in B cells and in cytokines with a proven role in bone reabsorption. Understanding the role played by B cells and the cytokine IL-11 and IL-17A in progressive erosive disease can help identify novel biomarkers of erosive disease and design treatment approaches aimed at halting joint damage in RA.

Entheseal power Doppler ultrasonography: a comparison of psoriatic arthritis and fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) pictures of peripheral entheses in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and fibromyalgia (FM). METHODS: Thirty patients with PsA and 30 with FM participating in a study aimed at identifying the clinical features that distinguish the 2 conditions underwent the PDUS assessment of 14 major peripheral entheses. All of the detected entheseal changes were recorded and scored, and the data were statistically analyzed by means of univariate analysis and receiver-operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty entheseal sites were assessed in each group of patients. At least 1 lesion was detected in each of the patients with PsA and in 80% of the patients with FM (p = 0.01), but inflammatory changes were present in respectively 70% and 23% (p = 0.001). A cutoff point of ≥ 3 involved sites had the greatest discriminating power in the patients with PsA, who were the only patients with bony erosions. PDUS signs of plantar fascia enthesopathy and Achilles tendon inflammation were highly specific of PsA. CONCLUSION: PDUS assessment of the peripheral entheses distinguishes patients with PsA and patients with FM in terms of the number and distribution of the involved sites, and the presence of inflammatory changes.

Identification of the clinical features distinguishing psoriatic arthritis and fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the clinical features that can help to distinguish between psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and fibromyalgia (FM). METHODS: Our cross-sectional study was carried out in 10 Italian rheumatology centers between January and September 2009, and enrolled all consecutive patients with PsA and FM who agreed to participate. Standard clinical and laboratory data for PsA and FM were collected from all patients. Records were made of somatic symptoms, response to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID), self-evaluated pain, general health, disability, and responses to the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire. Data were statistically analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses, and receiver-operating characteristic curves. The analysis concentrated on the clinical features shared by the 2 conditions. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-six patients with PsA (mean age 51.7 yrs; disease duration 10.2 yrs) and 120 patients with FM (mean age 50.2 yrs; disease duration 5.6 yrs) were evaluated. Univariate analysis showed that patients with FM had higher mean tender point and enthesitis scores, more somatic symptoms, and responded less to NSAID. Multivariate analysis showed that the presence of ≥ 6 FM-associated symptoms and ≥ 8 tender points was the best predictor of FM. CONCLUSION: The shared clinical features of PsA and FM that had the greatest discriminating power for FM were the number of FM-associated symptoms and tender point count.