Reoperation for sliding hip screws vs cannulated cancellous screws in femoral neck fractures: A study from the Danish Fracture Database Collaborators.

INTRODUCTION: It is still debated whether to use cannulated cancellous screw (CCS) or sliding hip screw (SHS) implants for femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients but there are no studies large enough to evaluate on smaller differences. The aim were to compare the reoperation and mortality rates of a large cohort of FNF patients above 60 years of age with internal fixation using CCS and SHS implants, with stratification by fracture classification. METHODS: This register study employed prospectively collected data from 2014 to 2018 from the Danish Fracture Database, including 2-year follow-up and data on age, sex, surgery, comorbidity and fracture classification. Reoperation data was retrieved from the Danish National Patient Register. The primary outcome was major reoperation, defined as re-osteosynthesis, conversion to arthroplasty, non-union surgery, Girdlestone procedure or deep infection 1-year post-surgery. Relative risk (RR) for the CCS group compared with the SHS group was estimated using Cox proportional hazards modelling, adjusted for age, sex and comorbidity (including 95% confidence intervals). RESULTS: A total of 2,598 FNFs were included, 1,731 with CCS (67%) and 867 with SHS (33%). The overall 1-year major reoperation rate was 15% with CCS and 13% with SHS, yielding an adjusted RR of 1.10 (0.88; 1.37) for CCS compared to SHS. The adjusted RR was 1.15 (0.77; 1.69) for undisplaced FNF, 1.09 (0.68; 1.75) for displaced FNF and 1.35 (0.94; 1.94) for transcervical FNF, which increased to 1.42 (1.01; 2.00) after 2 years. The minor reoperation rate was higher for CCS (3%) than SHS (1%), yielding an adjusted RR of 2.28 (1.14; 4.51). The adjusted RR for CCS compared to SHS was 0.83 (0.62; 1.12) for 30-day mortality and 0.96 (0.82; 1.14) for 1-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference between CCS and SHS in major reoperation rates; however, for transcervical FNF, CCS was associated with higher reoperation rates. Furthermore, CCS was associated with a higher risk of minor reoperation than SHS. There were no differences in mortality rates.

Cemented hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture patients: collarless, polished tapered stem (CPT) versus anatomic matte stem (Lubinus SP2).

BACKGROUND: Cemented hemiarthroplasty is a well-documented treatment for patients with femoral neck fractures (FNFs). However, there are not many cohort studies comparing different types of hemiarthroplasty (HA). OBJECTIVE: To compare CPT and Lubinus SP2 HA for FNF patients concerning complications and radiological measurements. METHODS: From January 1, 2013, CPT was introduced instead of Lubinus SP2 as the new cemented HA due to a regional procurement. Data were retrieved 3 years prior and after the introduction. All patient health records were retrospectively reviewed for types of implant, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and duration of admission. All X-ray images were analyzed for radiological measurements concerning offset, stem angulation and cement filling. Mortality and major complications within 1 year were retrieved from patient health records as well as the Danish National Patient Registry. Major complications were defined as dislocations, periprosthetic fractures and revisions. RESULTS: 584 cemented HA were included, 300 CPT and 284 with Lubinus SP2. The mean age (SD) was 82 (8.2) years, and there was no baseline difference between the groups concerning age, sex, ASA score and mortality. There were 8.7% major complications for CPT and 9.2% for Lubinus SP2 (p = 0.836). There were, however, seven periprosthetic fractures in the CPT group and one in the Lubinus SP2 group (p = 0.04). In contrast, there were 20 dislocations in the Lubinus SP2 group and 10 in the CPT group (p = 0.042). There was no statistical difference between the stem angulation and periprosthetic fractures (p = 0.824) or major complications (p = 0.602). The Lubinus SP2 had a mean plus 2.7 mm offset postoperatively (p = 0.001), while the CPT had plus 10.6 mm (p < 0.000). The mean (SD) angle of the stems was 1.39 (1.75) degrees for Lubinus SP2 and 2.46 (1.99) for CPT. There was no difference in cementation (p = 0.308). CONCLUSION: There was no overall statistical difference between the CPT and Lubinus SP2 stem regarding major complications. However, the CPT had a higher prevalence of periprosthetic fractures, while the Lubinus SP2 had a higher dislocation prevalence. The CPT stem had overcorrection of offset and a higher degree of varus positioning.