ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To report the experience of a university hospital center with sacral neuromodulation for patients with bladder voiding disorders. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients who underwent sacral neuromodulation between 1998 and 2022 for bladder voiding disorders were included. Medical records were analyzed retrospectively, and population, efficacy and follow-up data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients underwent test implantation and 122 patients were analyzed. 68 patients (56%) were implanted with a definitive neuromodulation device. Mean age was 43±16 years and BMI 25.5±5.4kg/m2. 74% were women. Bladder voiding disorder was due to sphincter hypertonia in 51% of cases, with associated bladder hypocontractility in 29%. The spontaneous micturition rate after implantation increased from 34% to 92%. Implantation results appeared to be better in patients with sphincter hypertonia, whether or not associated with bladder hypocontractility. The benefit was most often present with a frequency of 5Hz (54.4%). Side-effects were present in 52% of cases at 5 years, and in 85% of cases were pain in relation to the implanted devices. They resolved under medical treatment or after revision of the device (27% of cases at 5 years). CONCLUSION: SNM is effective in micturition recovery, but has side effects. Urodynamic mechanism and etiology may provide clues for modulating NMS box settings and determining predictive factors for NMS success. Data from other centers are needed to identify reliable predictive factors.
Subject(s)
Electric Stimulation Therapy , Urinary Bladder Diseases , Urination Disorders , Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Male , Urinary Bladder , Urination , Retrospective Studies , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Urinary Bladder Diseases/therapy , Urination Disorders/therapy , Muscle Hypertonia/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Lumbosacral PlexusABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of mid-urethral slings (MUS) in the surgical management of women presenting with urinary stress incontinence (USI) METHOD: A consensus committee of multidisciplinary experts (CUROPF) was convened and focused on PICO questions concerning the efficacy and safety of MUS surgery compared to other procedures and concerning which approach (retropubic (RP) vs transobturator (TO)) should be proposed as a first-line MUS surgery for specific subpopulations (obese; intrinsic sphincteric deficiency (ISD); elderly) RESULTS: As compared to other procedures (urethral bulking agents, traditional slings and open colposuspension), the MUS procedure should be proposed as the first-line surgical therapy (strong agreement). MUS surgery can be associated with complications and proper pre-operative informed consent is mandatory (strong agreement). Mini-slings (SIS/SIMS) should only be proposed in clinical trials (strong agreement). Both RP and TO approaches may be proposed for the insertion of MUS (strong agreement). However, if the woman is willing to accept a moderate increase in per-operative risk, the RP approach should be preferred (strong agreement) since it is associated with higher very long-term cure rates and as it is possible to completely remove the sling surgically if a severe complication occurs. The RP approach should be used for the insertion of MUS in a woman presenting with ISD (strong agreement). Either the RP or TO approach should be used for the insertion of MUS in an obese woman presenting with USI (strong agreement). In very obese women (BMI ≥35-40kg/m2), weight loss should be preferred prior to MUS surgery and bariatric surgery should be discussed (strong agreement) CONCLUSION: The current Opinion provides an appropriate strategy for both the selection of patients and the best therapeutic approach in women presenting with USI.
Subject(s)
Suburethral Slings , Urethral Diseases , Urinary Incontinence, Stress , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Suburethral Slings/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Urethra , Urethral Diseases/complications , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/etiology , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methodsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Vaginal LASER therapy is increasingly used in the field of urogynecology, but several points remain unclear. Our goal was to produce a systematic review of available evidence and provide a critical appraisal of available data. METHODS: A systematic review until march 2020 was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane and Embase databases. All studies about vaginal LASER use in the field of urogynecology were included. RESULTS: Forty studies have been included (8 for genitourinary syndrome of menopause, 19 for stress urinary incontinence, 3 for overactive bladder, 7 for urogenital prolapse, 3 for other indications). Data were heterogeneous, and level of evidence was weak or very weak. Few studies were comparative, and only 3 were randomized). Mild improvement of symptoms and quality of life and limited satisfaction were seen for genitourinary syndrome, stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder and prolapse. Few adverse events were reported. However, major methodological biases were noted regarding efficacy and safety evaluation. No long-term results were available. CONCLUSIONS: While Vaginal LASER therapy seem to provide encouraging results, the level of evidence supporting its use was weak, especially regarding long-term outcomes. Studies of better quality are warranted before any recommendation can be made. Current use should be limited to clinical research.
Subject(s)
Laser Therapy , Urinary Incontinence, Stress , Urology , Female , Humans , Lasers , Quality of Life , Urinary Incontinence, Stress/surgery , VaginaABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The main purpose was to assess the failure free survival of adjustable continence therapy ACT®/proACT® after continence was obtained and to seek factors influencing it. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, single-center survival study of peri-urethral balloons implanted between 2007 and 2014. Efficacy was defined by the wearing of 0 or 1 safety pad per day. The primary end point was time to failure estimated from a survival curve (Kaplan-Meier). Factors that could influence failure free survival were: sex, age, radiotherapy, diabetes, number of pad before surgery, number of balloon inflation, early complications, mixed urinary incontinence and previous ACT®/proACT® placement. They were analyzed in a COX regression. RESULTS: Of the 82 peri-urethral balloons placed, 41 were effective in 36 patients. The failure free survival was 50 % at 60 months. Radiotherapy, diabetes and previous peri-urethral balloon placement appeared to significantly decrease survival (P=0.031;P=0.025;P=0.029, respectively). Fifteen peri-urethral balloons were still effective at the last follow-up, one was lost to follow-up and 25 required re-intervention for loss of efficacy. The main cause of efficacy loss was system leakage. Fifty-two percent of peri-urethral balloons that became ineffective were replaced by new peri-urethral balloons and 28% by an artificial urinary sphincter. CONCLUSION: Patients who became continent with adjustable continence therapy (ACT®/proACT®) had a 50 % new surgery probability at 5 years for a loss of efficacy. Radiotherapy seems to be the main risk factor of the efficacy loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
