Prosthesis-prosthesis anastomosis using barbed sutures compared to conventional sutures under high, long-term pressure; in vitro extracorporeal circulation setup.

BACKGROUND: While barbed sutures have been extensively utilized in other disciplines, they have not been widely adopted in cardiac surgery. The lack of safety and feasibility data has limited its use within the field. To aide in the further understanding of how cardiac surgeons can use barbed sutures, we sought to develop a high-pressure in vitro simulation model. We compared knotless barbed sutures in a highly pressurized anastomosis to conventional sutures. METHODS: Ten specimens in total were utilized in prosthesis anastomosis, using 34 mm Gelweave Plexus (Terumo Aortic, Sunrise, FL 33325, USA) and 34 mm Hemabridge (Intergard Woven Hemabridge, Getinge, Göteborg, Sweden). Five models of size 3-0 barbed suture anastomoses using non-absorbable, barbed, self-retaining, monofilament polypropylene sutures (Filbloc® 3-0, Assut Europe, Rome, Italy) were compared against five conventional anastomoses using size 4-0 polypropylene monofilament (Ethicon, USA). The systems were connected using a novel-designed extracorporeal circulation system. Pressure was rapidly increased in the specimen to a mean pressure of 300-350 mmHg, running then for a minimum of 48 hours to assess anastomosis strength and endurance. RESULTS: No anastomotic dehiscence or rupture was recorded. Complex, angular anastomosis required extra stitch leakage sutures in both conventional and barbed suture specimens. CONCLUSION: Using knotless barbed sutures with an additional self-locking maneuver for prosthesis-prosthesis anastomosis in cardiac surgery is feasible in an in vitro model under long term, high-mean pressure when compared to conventional sutures. In vivo trials should be performed to further validate the in vitro findings.

Feasibility of Robotic Mitral Valve Repair Using Barbed Nonabsorbable Sutures: A Preliminary Single-Center Experience.

OBJECTIVE: Barbed nonabsorbable sutures have been widely adopted for tissue closure in noncardiac robotic surgery to improve intraoperative efficiency. Here, we examine the profile in robotic mitral valve repair (rMVR), which utilized barbed nonabsorbable sutures. To our knowledge, this is the first report to describe clinical outcomes for rMVR with barbed nonabsorbable sutures. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 90 patients who underwent rMVR using barbed nonabsorbable sutures at our center between 2019 and 2021. The primary outcome measure was dehiscence, while other relevant outcomes included 30-day readmission and 30-day mortality. RESULTS: In addition to fixation of the mitral annuloplasty band, barbed nonabsorbable sutures were employed commonly in concomitant pericardiectomy closure (100.0%, 90 of 90), atriotomy closure (100.0%, 90 of 90), and left atrial appendage closure (if eligible; 98.8%, 83 of 84). One patient who underwent mitral valve annuloplasty using only barbed nonabsorbable suture required reoperation for annuloplasty ring dehiscence. Immediate postoperative ring dehiscence was not observed in any patients after the routine reinforcement of barbed nonabsorbable sutures with everting pledgeted polyester sutures, and no additional patients required reoperation for suture-related complications. Clinical signs of dehiscence were not observed after pericardiectomy, atriotomy, or left atrial appendage closure with barbed nonabsorbable sutures. The 30-day readmission rate was 3.3% (3 of 90), and 30-day mortality was 0% (0 of 90). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest the initial feasibility of barbed nonabsorbable sutures in robotic cardiac surgery, specifically within rMVR. Further research is necessary to explore the long-term safety and efficacy profile of such approach.

An alternate approach: Percutaneous axillary cannulation for minimally invasive cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous axillary artery cannulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) offers a novel alternate approach to mechanical circulatory support for patients with contraindications to femoral perfusion. To our knowledge, this has not yet been reported in minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS). AIM: We aim to highlight our experience using percutaneous axillary artery cannulation to safely facilitate CPB for minimally invasive cardiac surgery MICS. METHODS: Four patients who underwent robotic cardiac surgery utilizing the axillary artery for percutaneous cannulation between November 2019 and August 2021 at a single center were identified and included in the analysis. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected and analyzed to support this case series. RESULTS: There were no perioperative hematomas, brachial plexus injuries, or neurovascular injuries. Within 30-days postoperatively there was no mortality, vessel injury, stroke, new onset atrial fibrillation, or other life-threatening bleeding. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous cannulation of the axillary artery is a novel and promising CPB modality for robotic cardiac surgery in patients with extensive peripheral and aortic atherosclerotic disease.