Prospective comparative study evaluating the role of flavonoids after endovenous thermal ablation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of flavonoids in the improvement of post-operative symptoms after endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA). METHODS: A prospective comparative study of 120 consecutive patients undergoing EVTA of the greater saphenous vein associated with phlebectomies was undertaken. Patients were grouped in those receiving micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF- 60 patients) agent 500 mg Bid 7 days pre- and 30 days post- operatively (MPFF group) and those in the control group (60 patients) who did not. Demographics, intra-operative details, Clinical -Etiology- Anatomy- Pathophysiology (CEAP) clinical class, 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (CΙVIQ-20) were recorded. Primary outcome was the postoperative pain assessement using the VAS scale and CIVIQ pain score. Secondary outcomes included assessement of VCSS and CΙVIQ-20 scores. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups regarding demographics, clinical and procedural characteristics. Patients in MPFF group reported significantly lower VAS pain levels than control group at 7- (-3.6 ± 1.2 vs -2.7 ± 1.9, p < .0001) and 30- post-operative day (-4.9 ± 0.1 vs -4.2 ± 1, p < .0001). MPFF group also showed better outcome in terms of CIVIQ pain score at 7- (-3.7 ± 1.3 vs -3.5 ± 1.8, p = .008) and 30- post-operative day (-5.3. ± 1.1 vs -4.4 ± 1, p = .017). Both groups showed a significant improvement in VAS pain score (p = .047), global CIVIQ-20 (p = .009) and VCSS (p = .008) at 7- and 30-days post-operatively. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of flavonoids in patients undergoing EVTA associated with phlebectomies reduces pain by a small amount during early postoperative period.

Prospective comparative study of different endovenous thermal ablation systems for treatment of great saphenous vein reflux.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to compare three different endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA) modalities in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence. METHODS: We performed a single-center, prospective, comparative cohort study that included consecutive patients undergoing EVTA of the GSV. Patients were treated with either segmental radiofrequency ablation (sRFA) or endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with a 1470-nm dual radial fiber or with a 1470-nm jacket-tip fiber. The clinical classification CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic), 10-cm visual analog scale scores for pain, Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSSs), and chronic venous insufficiency quality-of-life questionnaire (CIVIQ-20) scores were recorded. The primary outcome was clinical success, which was defined as the absence of reflux or recanalization of the GSV and procedure-related complications, assessed at 7 and 30 days and 1 year postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were the assessment of postoperative pain using the VAS and improvement in the VCSSs and CIVIQ-20 scores. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients (160 limbs) had undergone sRFA (sRFA group; n = 53 limbs), 1470-nm radial fiber EVLA (EVLA-R group; n = 55 limbs), or 1470-nm jacket-tip fiber EVLA (EVLA-J group; n = 52 limbs). The patient demographics, CEAP clinical class, and intraoperative details were comparable among the three groups. The GSV occlusion rate at 1 year was 93% in the sRFA group, 93% in the EVLA-R group, and 95% in the EVLA-J group. No major complications were observed postoperatively. Endothermal heat-induced thrombosis was observed in 2 (4.4%), 1 (2.2%), and 2 (4.4%) patients in the sRFA, EVLA-R, and EVLA-J groups, respectively (P > .5). The VCSS showed greater improvement in the EVLA-R group at 1 week compared with that in the sRFA (P = .05) and EVLA-J (P = .002) groups. Changes in the CIVIQ-20 score were in favor of the EVLA-R group at 7 days (-14.3 ± 10.3 vs -7.9 ± 5.9; adjusted difference, 6.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57-10.55; P = .01) and 30 days (-12 ± 8 vs -11.2 ± 7; adjusted difference, 5.5; 95% CI, 1.21-9.81; P = .02) postoperatively compared with the sRFA group and at 7 days compared with the EVLA-J group (-14.3 ± 10.3 vs -9.6 ± 7.9; adjusted difference, -4.4; 95% CI, -9.06 to 0.22; P = .05). Analyzing the different components of the CIVIQ-20, pain, and physical scores showed a greater reduction in the EVLA-R group in the early postoperative period compared with that in the sRFA and EVLA-J groups. CONCLUSIONS: All three EVTA modalities showed equal effectiveness and safety for the treatment of GSV reflux. EVLA with the 1470-nm radial fiber showed better outcomes in terms of early postoperative VCSSs and pain and physical CIVIQ scores. The clinical and quality of life benefits were similar for all modalities at 1 year postoperatively.

Large Diameter (≥29 mm) Proximal Aortic Necks Are Associated with Increased Complication Rates after Endovascular Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of proximal aortic diameter on outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). METHODS: This is a case-control (1:1) retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on 732 AAA patients treated with EVAR in 2 university centers. Patients with an infrarenal neck diameter of 29-32 mm (wide neck, WN group) were compared with patients with a neck diameter of 26-28.9 mm (control group) matched for age, gender, and maximum aneurysmal sac diameter. Any patients treated outside the instructions for use of each endograft or with no adequate follow-up were excluded. The primary end point was any neck-related adverse event (a composite of type Ia endoleak, neck-related secondary intervention, and endograft migration) during follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients with a proximal neck diameter of 29-32 mm (WN group) were compared with a matched control group of 64 patients with a neck diameter of 26-28.9 mm (control group). Oversizing was significantly higher in the study group (17.9% vs. 15.5%, P = 0.001). Overall median available follow-up was 24 months (range 12-84) (WN group 24 months vs. control group 18.5 months, P = 0.943). Primary end point was recorded in 8 patients (12.5%) of the WN group and in 1 patient (1.6%) of the control group. Freedom from the primary end point at 36 months (standard error <10%) was 87.3% for the study versus 98.4% for the control group (log rank = 4.66, P = 0.03). On multiple regression analysis, the presence of a proximal aortic neck >29 mm was the only independent risk factor for neck-related adverse events (odds ratio 7.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2-47.1). CONCLUSIONS: EVAR in the presence of a wide proximal aortic neck is likely to be associated with higher adverse neck-related event rates and thus, in such cases closer follow-up may be required.

Perioperative Management of DOACs in Vascular Surgery: A Practical Approach.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 10-15% of patients on DOACs have to interrupt their anticoagulant before an invasive procedure every year. The perioperative management and monitoring of DOACs have proved to be challenging, as differences in patients' status and in the invasiveness of each procedure develop different situations that need a tailored therapeutic approach to each patient's needs. METHODS: This review aims to summarize current evidence on the perioperative management of DOACs in patients undergoing a vascular surgical procedure focusing with a practical approach on three key clinical questions: (i) can we stop DOAC therapy before the vascular procedure? (ii) is bridging therapy necessary? and (iii) which is the best perioperative strategy for interruption and resumption of the anticoagulant therapy? RESULTS: No specific data exist for the perioperative management of vascular surgery patients on DOACs, as most studies include low number of such patients. Therapeutic strategy on how to handle DOACs perioperatively must be based on their half-life, the bleeding risk of the invasive procedures, and on the thromboembolic risk of the patient. Renal function plays a crucial role in such situations, increasing thromboembolic and bleeding risk. In general, DOACs should be stopped 2 days for high bleed risk, 1 day for low risk and should be resumed 48-72 hrs after high risk, 24 hrs after low-risk procedure. Bridging is almost never needed. CONCLUSION: Further perioperative research studies on patients undergoing vascular surgery are needed to confirm whether currently accepted therapeutic perioperative strategy is appropriate for these patients.

Initial Clinical Experience with the Endologix AFX Unibody Stent Graft System for Treating Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Case Controlled Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: The newly designed unibody AFX endograft system for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair is the only graft with anatomical fixation to the aortic bifurcation in comparison to most other grafts that use the infrarenal neck as the main fixation point. The aim of this study was to assess the preliminary results of the AFX stent-graft system used with infrarenal aortic component and compare them with those obtained in patients treated with a well established endograft of the same material and pure infrarenal fixation as the Gore Excluder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from March 2014 to December 2014 identified 10 elective abdominal aortic aneurysm patients treated with the AFX endograft, in comparison to a matched group of 20 patients treated with the Excluder stent-graft. Endpoints included technical and clinical success, freedom from any secondary intervention, any type of endoleak and aneurysm related death. RESULTS: Primary technical success was achieved in all patients and no 30-day device related complications or deaths were occurred. The two groups were similar in terms of radiation burden, contrast media, duration of the procedure, post implantation syndrome and in-hospital stay. During a median follow-up period of 23 months (range, 18-26 months) there were no differences in clinical success, freedom from reintervention and aneurysm related death. No type I endoleak was observed in either group. Five of the 6 type II endoleaks (1 in the AFX and 4 in the Excluder group) spontaneously resolved, while in only one patient (Excluder) the endoleak remained without however any change in aneurysm sac diameter (log rank=0.34). CONCLUSION: The initial experience with the AFX stent graft system is promising, with successful aneurysm exclusion and good short-term results. Further and larger studies are needed to fully evaluate the sort as well as the long-term results.

Combined coronary artery bypass grafting and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is a reasonable treatment approach: a systematic review.

We reviewed the literature for studies investigating the outcomes of combined 1-stage coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) open repair (OR) procedures. An electronic search of the English literature was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Age, coronary heart disease severity, AAA size, mean duration from CABG to AAA OR procedures, details of each procedure, mortality, and morbidity rates were analyzed. Between 1994 and 2012, 12 studies (256 patients) with 1-stage treatment fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. There were 20 early (30 days) deaths, accounting for a 30-day mortality rate of 7.8%. The early morbidity was 53% (136 of 256). One-stage treatment when necessary can be undertaken with acceptable mortality and reasonable morbidity rates considering the complexity of both the operations. Nowadays, endovascular AAA repair is preferred over OR. The outcomes of combined cardiac surgery and endovascular AAA repair have not been extensively evaluated.

Multidisciplinary lymphedema treatment program.

Lymphedema is an underrecognized and undertreated condition that requires a multidisciplinary approach in an individualized program that will address the special needs of each patient. In an ideal setting of an outpatient management program the team should be composed of a vascular surgeon, a dermatologist, a physiotherapist, a dietician, a psychologist, a social worker, and an office employee, working together in the assessment and management of all aspects of lymphedema. All treatment strategies and actions taken should ultimately focus on the improvement of the quality of life of patients suffering from lymphedema and on the prevention of lymphedema in high-risk patients.

A positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) evaluation of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms: another point of view.

BACKGROUND: To assess the prevalence of increased (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in aneurysmal walls, adopting a case-control approach in a population of asymptomatic patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: This study included 40 males (mean age: 74 years, range: 59-93 years), consecutive, white Caucasian patients, with asymptomatic infrarenal AAA. The mean diameter of AAA was 4.9 cm (range: 4.8-5.4 cm), detected by computed tomography (CT) scan. Control Subjects: 44 age-matched controls subjects (mean age: 71 years, range: 59-85 years, 24 males, 20 females) who were selected according to a case-control criterion among a population of patients without any clinical evidence of atherosclerotic disease. Patients and controls underwent simultaneous FDG-positron emission tomography (PET) and CT imaging from the skull base to the femoral neck by using an integrated PET/CT scanner. PET/CT studies were analysed both visually and quantitatively. For quantitative analysis, circular CT-based regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on the AAA, on all the aortic segments, and on the large vessel included in the study (carotid, subclavian, and iliac arteries). FDG uptake was quantified by calculating the mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) within each ROI and normalizing for the blood-pool SUV to obtain the final target-to-background ratio. Arterial calcium load was graded according to a semiquantitative five-point scale based on calcification of the arterial ring. RESULTS: Metabolic activity in the aneurysmal aortic segment was even lower with respect to both the adjacent--nonaneurysmal--samples of patient group and the corresponding arterial segments of control subjects (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). In visual analysis, no patients showed an increased focal uptake of degree adequate to identify the aneurysmal arterial wall. AAA patients showed significantly higher values of total calcium load (ACL) than controls in ascending aorta and subclavian and iliac arteries (P < 0.01), and only in AAA patient group, a significant correlation was present between values of ACL in both iliac arteries and abdominal aorta on one side and wall metabolic activity in the same arteries on the other (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our results suggest that FDG hot spot, as well an increased diffuse uptake of FDG, in PET/CT studies is an extremely rare finding in patients with AAA of diameter close to surgical indications.

Telemedicine in vascular surgery: clinical experience in a single centre.

Over a three-year period we performed 630 carotid endarterectomy procedures in 588 patients. From these we selected 90 patients (group A) who fulfilled the criteria for discharge one day after surgery. These patients were given an electronic blood pressure meter, a video phone for use at home and an antihypertensive drug (amlodipine). Using web-based video conferencing, we monitored the patients every 4 hours for the first two days. The other 498 patients (group B) were discharged on the second postoperative day. There were no significant differences between the groups in demographic characteristics, risk factors, carotid lesions, operative time, postoperative complications or blood loss. No cervical hematomas developed in group A. No patients needed to be readmitted because of major complications relating to the carotid endarterectomy. During the video-communication, 28 patients (31%) with a hypertensive crisis were treated by administration of amlodipine. At discharge, a questionnaire showed that there was a feeling of insecurity in both groups: 87% in group A vs. 79% in group B (P > 0.05). In group A, insecurity decreased after the first video connection and disappeared after the 8th day postoperatively. Telemedicine appears feasible and useful in carotid endarterectomy and may have other applications in vascular surgery care.

Role of interactive home telemedicine for early and protected discharge 1 day after carotid endarterectomy.

Our aim was to prove the feasibility and safety of a protocol for early and protected discharge 1 day after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using a system of telemedicine (TMD) monitoring. Among 147 patients operated upon for 163 CEAs, we selected a group (A) of 36 patients fulfilling criteria for discharge 1 day after surgery. An electronic blood pressure manometer, a videophone, an antihypertensive drug (amlodipine), and a customer satisfaction questionnaire were given to every group A patient. With a video-communication program linked to the Web, we monitored every 4 hours (from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.) for 2 days the surgical wound, blood pressure, and heart frequency of the patients. Other patients were included in group B. No differences regarding demographic characteristics, risk factors, carotid lesions, operative time, postoperative complications, or blood loss were noted between group A and group B. Twenty-one patients in group A were actually discharged 1 day after surgery. No cervical hematoma developed. Three hypertensive crises were treated successfully in group A. From the questionnaire a feeling of insecurity at discharge emerged, but it rapidly resolved. The overall cost of video connections was 25.39 +/- 0.25 Euros per patient. CEA can be safely done as 1-day surgery using a TMD monitoring system in selected cases. Our protocol allowed early discharge safely, leading to reduced hospital costs.