Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
JMIR Form Res ; 7: e44500, 2023 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37285185

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Up to 15% of pregnant and postpartum women commonly experience undiagnosed and untreated mental health conditions, such as depression and anxiety, which may result in serious health complications. Mobile health (mHealth) apps related to mental health have been previously used for early diagnosis and intervention but not among pregnant and postpartum women. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the acceptability of using mHealth to monitor and assess perinatal and postpartum depression and anxiety. METHODS: Focus group discussions with pregnant and postpartum women (n=20) and individual interviews with health care providers (n=8) were conducted to inform the acceptability of mHealth and determine its utility for assessing perinatal and postpartum mood symptoms. Participants were recruited via purposive sampling from obstetric clinics and the surrounding community. A semistructured interview guide was developed by an epidemiologist with qualitative research training in consultation with an obstetrician. The first author conducted all focus group discussions and provider interviews either in person or via Zoom (Zoom Video Communications, Inc) depending on the COVID-19 protocol that was in place during the study period. All interviews were audio recorded with consent; transcribed; and uploaded for coding to ATLAS.ti 8 (ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development Gmb H), a qualitative data analysis and retrieval software. Data were analyzed using the deductive content analysis method using a set of a priori codes developed based on the interview guide. Methodological rigor and quality were ensured by adopting a systematic approach during the implementation, data collection, data analysis, and reporting of the data. RESULTS: Almost all women and providers had downloaded and used at least 1 health app. The respondents suggested offering short questions in layperson language that could be understood by women of all educational levels and offering no more than 2 to 3 assessments per day at preferred timings decided by the women themselves. They also suggested that the women themselves receive the alerts first, with other options being family members, spouses, or friends if the women themselves did not respond within 24 to 72 hours. Customization and snooze features were strongly endorsed by women and providers to improve acceptability and utility. Women mentioned competing demands on their time during the postpartum period, fatigue, privacy, and the security of mental health data as concerns. Health care professionals highlighted the long-term sustainability of app-based mood assessment and monitoring as an important challenge. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study show that mHealth would be acceptable to pregnant and postpartum women for monitoring mood symptoms. This could inform the development of clinically meaningful and inexpensive tools for facilitating the continuous monitoring of, the early diagnosis of, and an early intervention for mood disorders in this vulnerable population.

2.
J ECT ; 39(2): 81-83, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36095090

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an evidence-based treatment for severe depression and bipolar disorder in pregnant women. Electroconvulsive therapy involves induction of general anesthesia, muscle relaxation, and positive-pressure ventilation. Airway manipulation may lead to complications such as vocal cord injury, aspiration, inability to ventilate, and death. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were differences in the incidence of airway complications in pregnant patients who underwent mask ventilation (MV) versus endotracheal intubation (ETI) compared with nonpregnant control subjects. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective chart review of all adult pregnant patients who underwent anesthesia for ECT from June 1, 2011, to June 30, 2020. Each ECT treatment delivered to a pregnant patient was matched with 2 ECT treatments delivered to a nonpregnant female control subject. Charts were queried for airway management (MV vs ETI), gestational age, and airway complications. Each ECT treatment was considered an independent event. RESULTS: Seventy-six ECT treatments from 11 pregnant patients were matched with 154 ECT treatments from 13 nonpregnant patients. In pregnant patients, airway management consisted of MV in 57 of the 76 treatments: 12 of 12 in the first trimester, 33 of 44 in the second trimester, and 12 of 20 in the third trimester. All 154 ECT treatments in the control group used MV. No airway complications were experienced in pregnant or nonpregnant patients with MV or ETI. CONCLUSIONS: No airway complications were observed in pregnant patients undergoing MV or ETI regardless of gestational age.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Electroconvulsive Therapy , Adult , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Electroconvulsive Therapy/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Intubation, Intratracheal/adverse effects
3.
Front Hum Neurosci ; 16: 997552, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36248692

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is increasingly used to treat the symptoms of various neurologic and psychiatric conditions. People can undergo the procedure during reproductive years but the safety of DBS in pregnancy remains relatively unknown given the paucity of published cases. We thus conducted a review of the literature to determine the state of current knowledge about DBS in pregnancy and to determine how eligibility criteria are approached in clinical trials with respect to pregnancy and the potential for pregnancy. Methods: A literature review was conducted in EMBASE to identify articles involving DBS and pregnancy. Two reviewers independently analyzed the articles to confirm inclusion. Data extracted for analysis included conditions treated, complications at all stages of pregnancy, neonatal/pediatric outcomes, and DBS target. A second search was then conducted using www.clinicaltrials.gov. The same two reviewers then assessed whether each trial excluded pregnant individuals, lactating individuals, or persons of childbearing age planning to conceive. Also assessed was whether contraception had to be deemed adequate prior to enrollment. Results: The literature search returned 681 articles. Following independent analysis and agreement of two reviewers, 8 pregnancy related DBS articles were included for analysis. These articles described 27 subjects, 29 pregnancies (2 with subsequent pregnancies), and 31 infants (2 twin pregnancies). There was 1 preterm birth at 35 weeks, and 3 patients who experienced discomfort from the DBS battery (i.e., impulse generator) placement site. All 27 patients had a DBS device implanted before they became pregnant, which remained in use throughout their pregnancy. There was exclusion of pregnant individuals from 68% of 135 interventional trials involving DBS. Approximately 44% of these trials excluded persons of childbearing age not on "adequate contraception" or wishing to conceive in the coming years. Finally, 22% excluded breastfeeding persons. Conclusion: The data from 29 pregnancies receiving DBS treatment during pregnancy was not associated with unexpected pregnancy or post-partum complication patterns. Many clinical trials have excluded pregnant individuals. Documentation of outcomes in larger numbers of pregnancies will help clarify the safety profile and will help guide study designs that will safely include pregnant patients.

4.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(25): 6180-6184, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34044744

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Assess women's perceptions of the impact of COVID-19 on their health care and well-being, access to and satisfaction with medical care due to the changes in delivery of care triggered by the pandemic. METHODS: An online survey of women having health care appointments in the outpatient facilities across all divisions of a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at a tertiary care referral center in North Central Florida. Patients had outpatient appointments that were scheduled, canceled or rescheduled, in person or by telemedicine, between 11 March 2020 and 11 May 2020, a time during which a COVID-19 stay-at-home order was enacted across our state. A total of 6,697 visits were planned. Patients with multiple visits were unified, leaving 6,044 unique patients to whom the survey was emailed between 20 July 2020 and 31 July 2020. The survey was closed on 21 August 2020. Analyses were focused on simple descriptive statistics to assess frequency of responses. Analyses of variance and chi-square analyses were conducted to compare outcomes when all cells were ≥ 10, based on sub-specialty and insurance status; otherwise, frequencies were examined for the entire sample only. Missing data were excluded listwise. RESULTS: A total of 6044 patients were contacted. Completed surveys numbered 1,083 yielding a response rate of 17.9%. The most common sub-specialty visit was gynecology (56.7%) followed by obstetrics (31.5%,), pelvic floor disorders (4.8%), gynecological oncology (2.9%,), and reproductive endocrinology (0.5%). A substantial percentage of women had visits canceled (19.2%), rescheduled (32.8%) or changed (42.1%) to telemedicine. In our patient population, 32.6% were worried about visiting the clinic and 48.1% were worried about visiting the hospital. COVID-19 triggered changes were perceived to have a negative impact by 26.1% of respondents. Refusal of future telemedicine visits was by 17.2%, however, 75.2% would prefer to use both in-person and telemedicine visits. CONCLUSION: During the initial COVID-19 surge with lockdown, the majority of survey respondents were following public health precautions. However, there were significant concerns amongst women related to obstetric and gynecologic medical appointments scheduled during that period. During pandemics, natural disasters and similar extreme circumstances, digital communication and telemedicine have the potential to play a critical role in providing reassurance and care. Nevertheless, given the concerns expressed by survey respondents, communication and messaging tools are needed to increase comfort and ensure equity with the rapidly changing methods of care delivery.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicine , Humans , Female , COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Pandemics , Telemedicine/methods , Women's Health
5.
Front Psychiatry ; 12: 734883, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34887784

ABSTRACT

Despite growing research and policy attention, perinatal behavioral health conditions (i.e., mental health and substance use disorders) remain prevalent, burdensome for families, and largely untreated in the US. Researchers have documented an array of barriers to accurate detection, linkage with effective treatment, and improved outcomes for perinatal women with behavioral health disorders. It is clear that a multi-component approach that integrates evidence-based detection and management of perinatal behavioral health in the context of obstetrics care can be effective. This paper presents the initial development of a clinical quality improvement program that includes evidence-based components of behavioral health integration in obstetrics in the state of Florida in the US. The FL BH Impact (Improving Maternal and Pediatric Access, Care and Treatment for Behavioral Health) program, guided by the RE-AIM model for program implementation, has been developed over the past 2 years. Program components, initial implementation, and preliminary findings are presented. Following the implementation phase, the program has enrolled 12 obstetrics practices and 122 obstetrics providers in program engagement and training activities. The primary program component allows for obstetrics clinician telephone access to a statewide listing of behavioral health referral resources for patients and access to consultation with psychiatry. Since program implementation, the program has received a total of 122 calls to this line, with an expected increasing trajectory of calls over time. Results suggest this program is feasible to implement across a large geographic area. Challenges to implementation and future directions are discussed. These types of multi-component approaches to improved management and outcomes for perinatal behavioral health are promising and must be expanded and sustained in the US.

6.
JBRA Assist Reprod ; 21(4): 330-335, 2017 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29068182

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore awareness of the reproductive versus the medical risks of obesity in a medical and non-medical college educated population. METHODS: An exploratory prospective research design was used. A 26-question online survey was developed and offered to a sample of medical students/residents (n=325) and non-medical college students (n=102). The data were analyzed using Graph Pad software. RESULTS: 102 non-medical undergraduate students (28% male and 72% female) and 325 resident physicians and medical students (46% male, 47% female, 7% unspecified) responded. Both groups reported higher awareness of the general risks of obesity as compared to the reproductive risks. As expected, lay students reported less awareness of female reproductive issues as compared to the medical group (all p-values <0.01). Over 90% of respondents would be motivated to lose weight before pregnancy if they knew of these risks, with more than half planning to have children in the future. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study found that despite having at least a college education, the populations studied had relatively low levels of awareness of obesity-related reproductive risks. The medical population had much more knowledge about the other health risks of obesity. The survey provided initial data that might be used to consider knowledge gaps and strategies for engaging and educating medical trainees and the public about the reproductive risks of obesity.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Infertility/etiology , Obesity/complications , Reproduction/physiology , Adult , Education, Medical , Female , Humans , Infertility/physiopathology , Male , Obesity/physiopathology , Physicians , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Students, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires , Universities
7.
Obstet Gynecol ; 129(6): 1068-1077, 2017 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28486356

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the geographic variation in the average teenage birth rates by county in the contiguous United States. METHODS: Data from the National Center for Health Statistics were used in this retrospective cohort to count the total number of live births to females aged 15-19 years by county between 2006 and 2012. Software for disease surveillance and spatial cluster analysis was used to identify clusters of high or low teenage births in counties or areas of greater than 100,000 teenage females. The analysis was then adjusted for percentage of poverty and high school diploma achievement. RESULTS: The unadjusted analysis identified the top 10 clusters of teenage births. The cluster with the highest rate was a city and the surrounding 40 counties, demonstrating an average teen birth rate of 67 per 1,000 females in the age range, 87% higher than the rate in the contiguous United States. Adjustments for poverty rates and high school diploma achievement shifted the top clusters to other areas. CONCLUSION: Despite an overall national decline in the teenage birth rate, clusters of elevated teenage birth rates remain. These clusters are not random and remain higher than expected when adjusted for poverty and education. This data set provides a framework to focus targeted interventions to reduce teenage birth rates in this high-risk population.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy in Adolescence/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adolescent Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Cohort Studies , Demography , Female , Humans , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Population Surveillance , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
8.
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol ; 30(4): 456-459, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28108212

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the effectiveness and effect of educational seminars given at 2 sites in north central Florida on the knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV), perceived barriers to HPV vaccination, and willingness to vaccinate against HPV in eligible patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was performed in conjunction with the Committee for the Healthcare of Underserved Women, District XII, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. One hundred participants, ages 18-65 years, were included in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Community outreach educational seminars, approximately 30 minutes in length, were given at 2 sites in Gainesville, Florida. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Before and after seminar surveys were given to evaluate the effect of the seminars on knowledge of HPV, willingness to vaccinate against HPV, and barriers to vaccination. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant improvement in the willingness to accept the HPV vaccine and an improvement in knowledge of several HPV-related facts. There was a statistically significant decrease in several perceived barriers to HPV vaccination. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates the utility of educational seminars in patients' acceptance of health care options. Improving the educational opportunities of patients and families in relation to the HPV vaccine has the opportunity to make a significant outcome on vaccination rates.


Subject(s)
Health Education/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Papillomavirus Infections/prevention & control , Papillomavirus Vaccines/therapeutic use , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Florida , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/immunology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
9.
J Reprod Med ; 61(7-8): 347-350, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30408380

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In July 2012 the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) published Committee Opinion No. 530, stating that postpartum sterilization should be considered an urgent surgical procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine whether active dissemination of the ACOG Committee Opinion and education of staff (our intervention) would result in higher rates of postpartum sterilizations. STUDY DESIGN: Two separate studies were conducted: (1) a retrospective chart review that examined postpartum sterilization rates prior to our intervention and (2) a prospective study that examined postpartum sterilization rates after the intervention. RESULTS: In the 3 months prior to the ACOG publication, 14 of 23 (61%) intended postpartum sterilization procedures were performed. During the 4 months after publication, 29 of 52 (55%) were completed (x² p=0.619). In the 5 months after education efforts, 69 of 79 (87%) were completed, showing a statistically significant improvement frot both prior time periods (x² p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients who desired postpartum sterilization during the prospective study were 5 times less likely to have their procedure canceled than were patients in the retrospective study. The Committee Opinion had. no significant effect on. com- pletion rates. Education of staff and the ongoing study were instrumental in facilitating desired tubal sterilizations.


Subject(s)
Patient Education as Topic , Postpartum Period , Sterilization, Tubal , Female , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Sterilization
10.
J Addict Med ; 9(3): 222-5, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25984838

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the length of stay for observation and treatment of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS), as well as the hospital costs associated with the medical care of affected newborns. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted at Shands Hospital at the University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Data were collected for newborns diagnosed with NAS, including their hospital length of stay and the associated hospital charges, from December 1, 2008, to November 30, 2011. RESULTS: One hundred-sixty eligible newborns were included in the study. During the 3-year study period, hospital charges related to the diagnosis and treatment of NAS increased from $1.1 million per year to $1.8 million per year. Compared with the cost of caring for newborns without the risk of NAS, an additional $4.1 million was spent in the medical care of these newborns. CONCLUSIONS: The costs associated with treating newborns with NAS are exponentially higher than the costs associated with newborns not affected with NAS. The societal costs associated with treatment of newborns with NAS, as well as infant symptomatology experienced with NAS, can be reduced by encouraging physicians to be proactive in screening for drug use, urging women who use chronic opioids to actively engage in family planning and contraception, and encouraging pregnant women who use opioids to seek substance treatment.


Subject(s)
Hospital Costs , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/economics , Opioid-Related Disorders/complications , Pregnancy Complications/economics , Female , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/diagnosis , Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome/therapy , Opioid-Related Disorders/economics , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...