[Is the ureteral length associated with the patient's size?] / La longueur de l'uretère est-elle liée à la taille du patient ?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relation between the ureteral length and the patients' size. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Prospective study made between September 2012 and May 2014, on 87 patients with 42 men and 45 women, in whom the ureteral measure was performed during the various procedures that require the use of a pigtail stent. The average age of the population was 53 years old (±15.9) with an average height of 168.3cm (±8.4). This has been achieved through ureteral catheter combining fluoroscopy and endoscopy. RESULTS: The ureteral average length was 23.5cm (±2.33). The ureteral average length was 23.8cm (±2.18) for man and 23.2cm (±2.44) for women. In this population, there were a positive correlation between the size of the patients and the length of the ureters (r=0.75; P=0.01). However, this correlation was not found in all subgroups, particularly among women (r=0.16; P=0.30) and on the right side of men (r=0.34; P=0.12). This correlation was still true for the left side in the men's group (r=0.50; P=0.02). CONCLUSION: In this study, there is a positive correlation between the patients' size and the ureteral length. But this correlation is not found in some subgroups. It is better to perform in vivo the ureteral measurement to have the precise length in order to set up a pigtail stent adapted to the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Sexual function before surgery for pelvic organ prolapse]. / Prolapsus uro-génital : analyse de la sexualité préopératoire.

AIM: The aim of our study was to assess the link between pelvic organ prolapse (POP) characteristics and sexual well-being using validated tools. MATERIAL: A prospective analysis was carried out in 148 women with a POP. The degree of prolapse was measured by using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POPQ). Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20) questionnaire score was used to estimate the severity of symptoms. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire short form (PISQ-12) scores determined sexual function level. RESULTS: No correlation was found concerning the global sexual function score and the POP stage (P=0.24). Pelvic and urinary symptoms were associated with a decrease in sexual function score (P=0.04 and P=0.002). Defecation symptoms were correlated with decreased sexual satisfaction (P ≤ 0.05) and were associated with premature ejaculation (P ≤ 0.05). Urinary symptoms were associated with dyspareunia (P ≤ 0.01), avoidance of sexual activities (P ≤ 0.05), negative emotions during intercourse (P ≤ 0.01) and decreased sexual excitement (P ≤ 0.05). Pelvic symptoms were significantly tied to avoidance of sexual activities (P ≤ 0.01), dyspareunia (P ≤ 0.05) and a poorer orgasm quality (P ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: The degree of pelvic organ prolapse was not statistically associated with sexual function. However, urinary, pelvic and defecatory (ano-rectal) symptoms were associated with a decrease in the couple's sexual well-being.

[Analysis of the evolution of surgery for the treatment of primary renal tumors during the period 2006-2010: report of 458 consecutive surgeries]. / Analyse de l'évolution des pratiques chirurgicales pour la prise en charge des tumeurs primitives du rein dans la période 2006-2010: à propos d'une série de 458 chirurgies consécutives.

OBJECTIVE: Most of small renal masses are accessible to conservative surgery, which has proved to maintain carcinological outcome, with a lower cardiovascular morbidity, hospital stay and mortality. Current international guidelines for the management of renal tumours recommend that partial nephrectomy be the new standard of treatment of T1 tumours. In this study, the authors assessed evolutive trends in the surgical management of renal tumours in the period 2006 to 2010 in a university hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a cohort of 446 consecutive patients treated for renal tumour between 2006 and 2010. RESULTS: Overall, 458 surgeries were performed, divided in 184 (40.2%) partial nephrectomy and 274 (49.8%) radical nephrectomy. During the study period, the number of partial nephrectomy increased significantly, with a mean annual increase rate of 10% in T1a tumours (P=0.002). We also observed a non significant increasing trend for conservative surgery in T1b tumours. Furthermore, the number of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy increased significantly, with a mean annual increase rate of 8% (P=0.02). At the end of the study period, one in two patients, whatever the stage, was treated by partial nephrectomy. This change in practice occurred without any increase in per- and postoperative morbidity (P=0.39). CONCLUSION: Analysis of this cohort of patients operated for renal tumour between 2006 and 2010 in our university hospital did not highlight underuse of conservative surgery, taking into account the current international guidelines. This trend for more partial nephrectomy did not underscore an increase in surgical morbidity or decrease in carcinological outcome. However, the higher rate of positive surgical margins in the laparoscopic partial nephrectomy group should incite to caution.