Experience with eribulin in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer, including a male.

Numerous patient- and disease-related factors must be considered when deciding a treatment approach for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. Hormone therapy (HT) is generally the first option in the absence of compelling reasons for chemotherapy (e.g., rapidly progressive visceral disease). After failure of first-choice HT, alternative HT options are usually attempted until hormone resistance occurs and chemotherapy becomes the treatment of choice. The first two patients presented herein experienced prolonged disease control with third-line eribulin after two lines of HT. The third report involves a case of male breast cancer which typically presents as the HR+/HER2- phenotype. Eribulin in the second line provided prolonged clinical improvement and was well tolerated.

Experience with eribulin in the treatment of elderly women with metastatic breast cancer: case studies.

Although advancing age can greatly increase the complexities of treating metastatic breast cancer, chronological age alone is insufficient to determine the type or intensity of treatment. Older patients require an individualized approach that takes into account the patient's physical ability, social circumstances and mental capacity to tolerate treatment. This section features three older women treated with eribulin for metastatic breast cancer. In the first case, a 70-year-old woman maintained stable disease into her 34th month of treatment with third-line eribulin. In the remaining cases, two heavily pretreated women (80 and 90 years, respectively) with metastatic disease and liver involvement presented objective radiological benefit to later-line eribulin along with prolonged clinical improvement and good tolerability.

Dynamics of circulating tumor cells in early breast cancer under neoadjuvant therapy.

At present, the majority of patients with breast cancer are diagnosed at early stages of disease development. However, a considerable number of such cases develop secondary malignancies after a relatively short period of time. The presence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has been proposed as a strong biomarker to predict disease recurrence in metastatic breast cancer. However, the prognostic significance is not clear in early breast cancer. We present results on CTC determination in peripheral blood in non-metastatic breast cancer patients in the context of neoadjuvant treatment. Twenty-six breast cancer patients, scheduled for neoadjuvant therapy, were enrolled in a prospective study, of which 24 were able to complete therapy. CTC assessment was performed by sorting out cytokeratin-positive cells from 10 ml of peripheral blood using immunomagnetic separation, followed by immunocytochemical characterization of cells. Seventeen blood samples out of 24 patients were CTC-positive when collected prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. No significant correlations were found between the presence of CTCs and lymph node status (p=0.1), histological type (p=0.802), stage (p=0.43) or overall survival (OS) (p=0.599). Thirteen CTC-positive samples were observed in blood samples collected after treatment. Univariate analyses revealed that the presence of CTCs was related to OS when the detection was positive both before and after treatment (p=0.023). CTCs can be a strong prognostic marker in early breast cancer. The persistence of CTCs before and after treatment can identify a subpopulation of patients with an increased risk of recurrence.

Exemestane and chemotherapy as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: results of a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic breast cancer remains largely incurable. Strategies involving the combination of the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen and chemotherapy have been abandoned in view of unacceptable toxicity because of thromboembolic events. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of the third-generation steroidal aromatase inhibitor exemestane plus chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer received 6 cycles of intravenous chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil [5-FU], epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide) and exemestane 25 mg/day that was continued after chemotherapy was completed. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to progression (TTP), and response rates were also assessed. Safety was assessed from adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (median age, 62 years) were included in this study. Twenty patients completed 6 chemotherapy cycles. Median TTP was 13.7 months. Overall response was achieved by 20 patients (73.9%), and the clinical benefit rate was 87%. During the chemotherapy plus exemestane treatments, 50 adverse events were reported in 14 of the 23 patients (60.9%). As expected, the incidence of adverse events decreased during the phase of exemestane treatment alone (19 adverse events in 10 of 20 patients [50%]). There were 2 grade 4 events reported, pulmonary embolism and pneumonia, although pneumonia was not considered to be related. CONCLUSION: Although a small number of patients were included, the combination of exemestane and chemotherapy was well tolerated and only 1 thromboembolic event was reported. Response rates were similar to other comparable series and may encourage further studies to confirm the efficacy of chemotherapy in combination with an aromatase inhibitor.

Advanced breast cancer: chemotherapy phase III trials that change a standard.

At the present time, there is not a standard regimen in upfront metastatic setting for breast cancer. A wide variety of regimens which includes anthracyclines, taxanes, gemcitabine or capecitabine are currently used, however, there is evidence to support the use of many of these drugs in early breast cancer and consequently limiting their use in first line treatment. The aim of this review is to evaluate every randomized phase III trials conducted in first line metastatic breast cancer. For this reason, all randomized studies that evaluated the role of chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer were analyzed and classified according to their protocol design. So far, sixteen major randomized clinical trials have evaluated the role of chemotherapy as front line in metastatic breast cancer. Some of them have analyzed a different anthracyclines-based regimen as the control arm versus new combinations or new drugs. In others, the aim is to evaluate the most effective therapy after progression to an adjuvant anthracyclines-containing regimen. The suitability of the control arm, the prospective definition of patient's subgroups as well as the statistical methodology have been taken into account.

A phase II trial of gemcitabine and weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil in a 48-hour continuous-infusion schedule in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma. A study of the Spanish Cooperative Group for Gastrointestinal Tumour Therapy (TTD).

AIM: A multi-centred, open-labelled, phase 11 study containing 46 patients was conducted to evaluate the clinical benefit of gemcitabine (1,400 mg/m(2)) combined with 5-FU (3 g/m(2)) in a 48 h continuous infusion (CI). METHODS: Both drugs were administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of every 4 week cycle in chemotherapy-naïve patients with locally advanced unresectable metastatic pancreatic carcinoma. The minimum follow-up was 6 months. RESULTS: Clinical benefit response was the primary endpoint and this was achieved by 24.4% of the patients. Quality of life (QoL) improved in 16.6% of patients. Objective response was observed in 7% of the patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.4 weeks and the median overall survival (OS) time was 22.7 weeks. One-year survival was 25%. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (45%), mucositis (7.5%) and hyperbilirubinaemia (10.5%). CONCLUSIONS: This schedule was not superior in terms of clinical benefit, response rate, PFS and OS than standard gemcitabine treatment