Impaired attention predicts falling in Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND: Cognitive deficits, in particular deficits of attention and executive function, may affect postural sway and balance in Parkinson's disease (PD). Our objective was to determine whether measures of attention were associated with falls in a large cohort of subjects with PD studied prospectively. METHODS: Patients meeting UK PD Society Brain Bank Criteria were included. Assessment included UPDRS III and the Cognitive Drug Research computerised assessment battery (CDR) from which Power of Attention, Continuity of Attention, cognitive reaction time and reaction time variability were derived. Falls were assessed prospectively using monthly fall diaries returned over a year following baseline assessment. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty four subjects completed fall diary datasets. One hundred and three (63%) fell one or more times during the 12 month period. Regression analysis revealed an association of fall frequency with poorer Power of Attention and increased reaction time variability, which was retained after correcting for UPDRS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced power of attention and increased reaction time variability are associated with increased fall frequency in PD. This has implications for the identification of those most at risk of falling, and for the management and prevention of falls in this patient group.

Poor attentional function predicts cognitive decline in patients with non-demented Parkinson's disease independent of motor phenotype.

BACKGROUND: Postural instability gait difficulty (PIGD) motor phenotype in Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with a faster rate of cognitive decline than in tremor dominant cases and may be a risk factor for incident dementia. People with PD display attentional deficits; however, it is not clear whether attentional deficits in patients with non-demented PD are associated with (i) PIGD phenotype and/or (ii) subsequent cognitive decline. AIMS: (i) To examine rates of cognitive decline (Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG)) over 3 years in subjects with non-demented PD aged over 65 years, (ii) using Cognitive Drug Research computerised assessment test battery, determine the rate of change in power of attention (PoA) scores over time (sum of mean choice reaction time, simple reaction time and digit vigilance reaction time scores), (iii) determine whether the PIGD phenotype is associated with changes in PoA and (iv) establish whether baseline PoA is associated with subsequent cognitive decline. RESULTS: 14 subjects (38%) were classified as PIGD motor phenotype at baseline. Cognitive decline was greater in PIGD compared with non-PIGD subjects (p < or = 0.02). PIGD phenotype was not associated with baseline PoA score although it was associated with subsequent worsening in PoA (mean PoA increase/year: non-PIGD subjects 11.4 ms; PIGD subjects 244.0 ms; p = 0.01). Higher baseline PoA scores were associated with greater cognitive decline (MMSE, p = 0.03; CAMCOG, p = 0.05) independent of PIGD status. CONCLUSION: PIGD phenotype and attention deficits are independently associated with a greater rate of cognitive decline in patients with non-demented PD. We propose that subtle attentional deficits in patients with non-demented PD predict subsequent cognitive impairment.

Effect of levodopa on cognitive function in Parkinson's disease with and without dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies.

BACKGROUND: Levodopa (L-dopa) is the gold standard treatment for Parkinson's disease, but a lack of clear efficacy combined with a perceived liability to neuropsychiatric side effects has limited L-dopa use in patients with parkinsonism and dementia. Therefore, the effect of L-dopa on the cognitive profile of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson's disease with dementia (PDD) is unclear. AIM: To ascertain the acute and long-term effects of L-dopa on aspects of attention and cognition in patients with DLB and PDD, and to compare these with the effects in Parkinson's disease. METHOD: Baseline cognitive and motor function was assessed off L-dopa in patients with Parkinson's disease (n = 22), PDD (n = 27) and DLB (n = 11) using standard "bedside" measures and a computerised programme detecting reaction times and accuracy. All patients then underwent an acute L-dopa challenge with subsequent subjective and objective analysis of alertness, verbal recall, reaction times and accuracy. The same parameters were measured after 3 months on L-dopa to assess the prolonged effect. RESULTS: Acute L-dopa challenge considerably improved motor function and subjective alertness in all patients without compromising either reaction times or accuracy, but increased fluctuations were noted in both groups with dementia. Neuropsychiatric scores improved in patients with Parkinson's disease both with and without dementia on L-dopa at 3 months. Although patients with Parkinson's disease also had better mean global cognitive function at this time, mean verbal attention and memory deteriorated, and patients with PDD had slower reaction times in some tests. No patient had a marked deterioration over this time. Patients with DLB did not experience any adverse cognitive or neuropsychiatric effects after 3 months of L-dopa treatment. CONCLUSION: The use of L-dopa in patients with parkinsonism with dementia does not adversely affect cognitive function.

Motor subtype and cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease, Parkinson's disease with dementia, and dementia with Lewy bodies.

BACKGROUND: A previous cross sectional study found over-representation of a postural instability gait difficulty (PIGD) motor subtype in Parkinson's disease patients with dementia (PDD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), compared with Parkinson's disease (PD). AIMS: (1) To examine rates of cognitive and motor decline over two years in PD (n=40), PDD (n=42) and DLB (n=41) subjects, compared with age matched controls (n=41), (2) to record whether motor phenotypes of PD, PDD, and DLB subjects changed during the study, (3) to find out if cognitive and motor decline in PD was associated with baseline motor subtype, and (4) to report the incidence of dementia in PD patients in relation to baseline motor subtype. RESULTS: Most of PDD and DLB participants were PIGD subtype at baseline assessment. In the non-demented PD group, tremor dominant (TD) and PIGD subtypes were more evenly represented. Cognitive decline over two years was greater in PDD and DLB groups (mean decline in MMSE -4.5 and -3.9, respectively), compared with PD (-0.2) and controls (-0.3). There was an association between PIGD subtype and increased rate of cognitive decline within the PD group. Of 40 PD patients, 25% of the 16 PIGD subtype developed dementia over two years, compared with none of the 18 TD or six indeterminate phenotype cases (chi2=6.7, Fisher's exact test p<0.05). CONCLUSION: A PIGD motor subtype is associated with a faster rate of cognitive decline in PD and may be considered a risk factor for incident dementia in PD.