Researching the level of agreement among experts on terms used to describe wounds: An international study.

Establishing a common language that allows univocal and objective communication in describing wounds and their healing is of utmost importance in defining the diagnostic hypothesis and proper wound management. To measure the level of agreement on the description of wounds, an international study was performed among experts of different professional backgrounds on several common terms used to describe ulcerative lesions. A panel of 27 wound care experts anonymously completed a multiple-choice questionnaire on 100 images of 50 ulcerative lesions. The participants were asked to describe each image using a set of pre-defined terms. An expert data analyst interpreted the questionnaires to map the level of agreement on the used terminology. Our findings show a very low level of agreement among experts in using the proposed terminology to describe the wound bed, the wound edge, and the surrounding skin conditions. Efforts should be planned to find a consensus on the correct use of terminology for wound description. To this aim, partnership, consensus, and agreement with educators in medicine and nursing are necessary.

"I Cry. I Simply Cry." An Ethnography of a Lymphedema Summer Camp.

Background: The aim of this study was to explore how self-management is taught, learnt, and experienced during a 3-day educational Lymphedema Camp for parents of children with lymphedema. Methods: Participants (professionals, parents, and children) were observed during camp activities and interviewed informally and formally in focus groups. The embodied nature of the experience expressed by professionals, parents, and researchers became the analytical focus for understanding the felt tensions in the teaching and learning of self-management to families. Findings: The affective sensibilities associated with the uncertainties involved in teaching and learning self-management skills were palpable given that: young people are now expected to take up strict time-consuming self-management regimens (often via the support of a parent) where "evidence-based" outcomes are uncertain or may not match the outcomes wanted by a young person (varying in age and therefore ability or willingness to engage); or where there are tensions within the family; and the variety of different professionals involved means that techniques varied but where these professionals also lacked the necessary skills training to guide them in how to teach self-management. An analytical focus on the distress, doubt, fear, loneliness, guilt, and moralism felt by professionals, parents, and the researchers supports us to identify the character of the problems associated with performing best practice care guidance where there is a lack of practical support or resources for how self-management in this population should be achieved. Conclusion: To avoid these issues more training and research are needed on "how" to self-manage and stop victim-blaming that generates tensions and drives a wedge between the carer and the cared-for. When systemic problems get located with individuals (professionals, parents, or children), this directs our attention and understanding away from systems of care that lack coordination, may be under-resourced, and where effective training is absent.

A Study Using Visual Art Methods to Explore the Perceptions and Barriers of Self-Management in Children and Adolescents with Lymphedema.

Background: The aims of this study were to explore, using visual art methodology, how children and adolescents perceive their lymphedema and conceptualize the barriers and enablers in self-management and to explore the role of an educational camp in promoting self-efficacy. Methods: Participants (speaking English, French, and Italian) were recruited during an educational camp for children with lymphedema. Children and adolescents used different methodologies to depict living and self-managing their condition. Younger children (aged 5-12 years) drew pictures, and all children and adolescents (aged 5-18 years) were given cameras and asked to take photographs that depicted their experience of learning self-management of their condition during the camp. Rose's critical visual methodology framework was used for analysis. Results: Analysis of the data produced five categories: Normal versus altered childhood, living with lymphedema; perceptions of lymphedema and self-care in younger children; adolescents' perception of living and managing lymphedema; learning self-efficacy; and insights into cultural differences in self-care. Conclusions: The study has shown that self-management is complex. Children and adolescents face many daily challenges and frustrations in managing their condition in addition to the normal challenges of development and growth that impact on: home life, time with friends, school activities, and relationships. Children expressed a deep longing for cure and a recognition that their lives were altered by having the condition that led to limitations in sport and wearing fashionable clothes and shoes. The importance of relationships with professionals was critical as was the experience of meeting and learning with other children through the camp experience. Attempts to simplify self-management techniques would appear to be a key priority as would a greater understanding of the self-beliefs young people have of their ability to influence and control their condition and its impact on their life.

Improving the quality of clinical research on chronic wound infection treatment: expert-based recommendations.

OBJECTIVE:: To produce recommendations for the design of reliable and informative clinical investigations in chronic wound infection. METHOD:: A multidisciplinary panel of international experts from four countries (Italy, UK, Ireland and the US) were involved in a detailed, semi-structured discussion on how to better select and describe a target population, interventions and outcomes, and which infection-related criteria to apply in order to achieve a high-quality trial. Consent among the experts was measured using the Delphi method and GRADE Working Group suggestions. The project was fully supported by AISLeC 2016 (Italian Nursing Society for Wound Care Study). RESULTS:: In total, 37 recommendations achieved substantial agreement among the experts; 10 concerned the most appropriate description and selection of a target population, four related to interventions and 15 to outcomes. A further eight statements about critical methodological points were approved. CONCLUSION:: Developing recommendations in a systematic manner through a representative group of experts could generate tools for improving the design of clinical trials in this challenging area.

Identifying the factors that influence surgeon's compliance with excisional margins of non-melanoma skin cancer.

The rising incidence of Non Melanoma Skin Cancers (NMSC) leads to a high number of surgical procedures worldwide. The strict compliance with international guidelines with regard to excisional margins may help decrease the number of re-excision procedures and reduce the risk of NMSC recurrence. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of excisional margins as recommended by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) and the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) guidelines, and the factors (demographic or clinical) that influence surgeons' compliance with these guidelines.This was a prevalence study looking at surgical excisions of NMSCs performed over a period of 2 years (2011-2012). A sample size of 1669 patients was considered. Definition of excisional margins recommended by the international guidelines (EADV and EDF) were used as point of reference for the analysis. Tumor and histologic specimen size were calculated ex vivo by 5 different pathologists. The size of skin specimens was measured with a major axis and a minor axis. The same was done for the tumor present on the skin specimens. The differences between the major and minor axes of surgical specimen and tumor were calculated. These differences were subsequently divided by two, hypothesizing that the lesion had the same distance from the margins of the surgical specimen. The differences obtained were named "Delta", the formulas applied being the following:Delta major = (major axis specimen-major axis tumor)/2; Delta minor = (minor axis specimen-minor axis tumor)/2.Results show a significant statistical difference, associated with factors such as: age of the patient, anatomical localization of the tumor, histological diagnosis, and surgeons' experience.The identification of these factors sheds light on clinicians' practice and decision-making regarding excisional margins. Hopefully a higher level of adherence to the guidelines can be achieved in the future.

Researching the lived experiences of cancer patients with malignant fungating wounds.

BACKGROUND: Researching the experiences of terminally ill patients with disfiguring wounds is likely to be a challenge anywhere, and this investigation came face-to-face with different attitudes on the part of both patients and nurses and doctors in England (the South-East) and Italy (Tuscany). AIM: To highlight the complexity of researching sensitive subjects and the difficulties encountered from the perspective of the researcher(s). METHODS: Some 14 patients were interviewed. In England access was relatively straightforward, with nurses linked to the hospice doing most of the recruitment. Access was more difficult in Italy, with some doctors expressing opposition. DISCUSSION: How ethical is it to treat dying patients as subjects for research? How does research of this kind vary from one culture to another? CONCLUSIONS: Interviewees can find it therapeutic to talk about their experiences to a sympathetic listener--although the listening does pose a considerable strain on the researcher.