Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol ; 11(1): 35-41, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11322743

ABSTRACT

Methylphenidate is the most frequently prescribed stimulant medication for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, the short duration of action of methylphenidate requires that patients take multiple daily doses for optimal efficacy. Recent studies suggest that Adderall, a psychostimulant indicated for the treatment of ADHD, may provide an efficacious, less frequently dosed alternative to methylphenidate. This retrospective review compares the efficacy, safety, dosing frequency, and medication switch rates of Adderall with methylphenidate in children and adolescents with ADHD treated in a private, outpatient psychiatric clinic. Of the evaluable patients, 54 received Adderall, and 75 received methylphenidate. No statistically significant differences were noted between Adderall and methylphenidate in efficacy or safety parameters. Fewer patients receiving Adderall required twice daily, thrice daily, or in-school dosing than those receiving methylphenidate (p < 0.001). During the initial 6-month treatment period, patients treated with Adderall were less likely to switch medications than those receiving methylphenidate (p = 0.0002). In this analysis, Adderall and methylphenidate provided comparable efficacy and safety in children and adolescents with ADHD. The use of Adderall allowed patients to extend their dosing interval and reduced the need for in-school dosing, a measure that may substantially influence compliance.


Subject(s)
Amphetamines/therapeutic use , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/drug therapy , Central Nervous System Stimulants/therapeutic use , Methylphenidate/therapeutic use , Amphetamines/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Stimulants/adverse effects , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Methylphenidate/adverse effects , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
2.
J Am Osteopath Assoc ; 99(5): 259-64, 1999 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10370278

ABSTRACT

Asthma has become a serious challenge to clinical medicine today, with an increase in incidence, morbidity, and mortality over the past two decades. Asthma continues to be a problem despite increased knowledge of the pathophysiology of asthma coupled with the development of a variety of new and innovative medications that can be used to treat asthma. Five areas involving asthma management are reviewed and involve a failure to do the following: (1) identify disease instability and progression; (2) adopt an optimal pharmacologic treatment plan; (3) identify and help the patient avoid environmental triggers; (4) evaluate and treat certain disruptive psychodynamic issues; and (5) use essential non-pharmacologic modes of therapy such as osteopathic manipulation, nutritional considerations, physical training, and controlled breathing techniques that may help to favorably modify the asthma disease process.


Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/therapy , Manipulation, Orthopedic/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/prevention & control , Child , Environmental Pollution/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Osteopathic Medicine/methods , Prognosis , Treatment Outcome
3.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9231318

ABSTRACT

Risperidone is a newly available atypical antipsychotic agent that has been reported to be associated with fewer extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) than conventional neuroleptics in adults with schizophrenia. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of risperidone in 16 children and adolescents (aged 9-20 years, mean 14.9 years) who were clinically diagnosed with psychotic disorders: 13 patients met DSM-III-R criteria for schizophrenia, 2 met criteria for schizoaffective disorder, and 1 had schizophreniform disorder. Eleven of the 16 patients had previous unsuccessful neuroleptic trials. Patient charts were reviewed by the patients' child and adolescent psychiatrist for diagnoses, clinical changes, and adverse events. Clinical response was assessed retrospectively using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale. With the risperidone dose titrated gradually, an optimal clinical response was found at a mean daily risperidone dose of 5.93 mg (range 2-10 mg). All but one of the 16 patients had an adequate clinical response to risperidone therapy. Statistically significant improvements were found in the CGI (p < 0.0001), the BPRS Total Score (p < 0.0001), and the BPRS Negative Symptom Score (p < 0.001). In general, only mild drug-induced side effects were experienced, with 5 patients developing mild sedation and 3 developing EPS. Risperidone appeared to be safe and effective in ameliorating symptoms of schizophrenia in this age group. It is speculated that the gradual titration of risperidone was crucial in achieving a relatively low rate of EPS.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Risperidone/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Child , Humans , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risperidone/adverse effects , Schizophrenic Psychology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL