Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pediatr Urol ; 15(5): 527.e1-527.e6, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31537436

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Although the pediatric urologic community has embraced a multidisciplinary genetic and endocrine evaluation for newborns with ambiguous genitalia, this approach has been reserved for the most severe cases of undervirilized 46,XY individuals despite growing evidence that genetic differences are found even in patients whose only genitourinary anomaly appears to be proximal hypospadias. Identifying these genetic differences is vital for counseling patients as they move through puberty to parenthood as well as parents on future pregnancies. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to evaluate genetic diagnosis in patients with proximal hypospadias. The authors hypothesized the more sensitive genetic evaluation available in the modern era will reveal a high rate of patients with proximal hypospadias and descended testicles who are found to have a genetic difference, supporting a thorough genetic evaluation in these patients. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent surgical correction for proximal hypospadias at a single institution from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016. Those with midshaft hypospadias were excluded as were patients whose primary surgery was performed at an outside institution. Patient characteristics, including demographics, clinical presentation, genetic evaluation, and referral to a multidisciplinary difference of sex development (DSD) clinic, were collected. The chi-squared test and t-test were used for analysis. RESULTS: There were 112 patients with proximal hypospadias who met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 91 had bilaterally descended testicles, whereas 21 had one or more undescended testicles. Thirty-three percent of patients with isolated proximal hypospadias received genetic testing of some kind, with 24% seen in the multidisciplinary DSD clinic. Four patients had an associated genetic syndrome identified, and 5 had a genetic difference of unknown clinical significance. Overall, 10% of patients with proximal hypospadias and descended testicles had an identifiable genetic difference vs 33% with associated cryptorchidism. Of these, one patient with proximal hypospadias and descended testicles had a genetic difference of known clinical significance that was likely to have been missed in the absence of an evaluation by a geneticist. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: There was a high rate of identifiable genetic differences in patients whose only genitourinary abnormality was proximal hypospadias, especially with the 1% risk of a likely missed diagnosis. These findings support the discussion of a genetic evaluation for all patients with proximal hypospadias, regardless of the testicular location.


Subject(s)
Cryptorchidism/genetics , Genetic Testing/methods , Hypospadias/genetics , Sexual Development/physiology , Sexual Maturation/physiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cryptorchidism/diagnosis , Cryptorchidism/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Hypospadias/diagnosis , Hypospadias/surgery , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Retrospective Studies , Urologic Surgical Procedures, Male/methods
3.
J Pediatr Urol ; 14(4): 322.e1-322.e6, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30078549

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There have been few prior studies on patient-centered outcomes of adults with bladder exstrophy; those performed have been single institution reviews. In collaboration with the Association for the Bladder Exstrophy Communities (ABeC) - an international support network for patients and families living with bladder exstrophy - an anonymous social media survey was performed of patient-reported genital appearance and erectile function. OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated the Penile Perception Score (PPS) and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) in adult men with bladder exstrophy. It was hypothesized that scores would be significantly lower than prior reported scores for men without the condition. STUDY DESIGN: After review by an anonymous patient advocate volunteer, the ABeC performed an anonymous online survey using social media. RESULTS: Adult men with bladder exstrophy reported PPS, and satisfaction with penile length and axis that were lower than prior published controls (n = 54, P < 0.05). Orgasmic function, sexual desire, and overall satisfaction were also lower (n = 46, P < 0.05). There was no difference in erectile function or intercourse satisfaction compared to controls. There was an association between PPS and erectile function, intercourse satisfaction, and overall satisfaction (P < 0.05) (Summary Fig.). Respondents identified urinary issues, genital appearance, and sexual function as the three main domains that warranted further research. CONCLUSION: This study found that PPS and IIEF-15 were low in adult men with bladder exstrophy, and worse perception of genital appearance was associated with worse sexual satisfaction. Social media is a novel tool for patient-centered outcomes research, and continued collaboration with patients and patient advocate groups is vital.


Subject(s)
Bladder Exstrophy/surgery , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Patient Satisfaction , Penis/anatomy & histology , Social Media , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Orgasm , Penile Erection , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...