People with epilepsy and intellectual disability: More than a sum of two conditions.

BACKGROUND: Around 25% of people with Intellectual Disability (PwID) have comorbid epilepsy with seizures in up to two-thirds being drug-resistant. Little is known of the general characteristics and prescribing practices to this population. AIM: Describe and compare characteristics of two cohorts of PwID and epilepsy in two different countries to inform clinical practice better. METHOD: An explorative, retrospective, case-note review in a specialist ID community service in England and in an expert center for PwID and epilepsy in the Netherlands was conducted. Information on ID severity, medical/behavioral/psychiatric/neurodevelopmental/genetic comorbidities, psychotropic, and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for each cohort was collected. FINDINGS: The English cohort consisted of 167 people (98 males; age range 18-73 years; mild/moderate ID- 35%) and the Dutch cohort of 189 people (111 males; age range 18-85 years; mild/moderate ID - 51%). The two cohorts were comparable in their baseline characteristics. The Dutch had higher rates of physical comorbidity, but less mental or behavioral disorders and were more likely to be on anti-psychotic medication. The mean dosages between three most common AEDs prescribed were similar. The most frequently prescribed drug in both centers is valproate. Three-quarters of the Dutch were on three or more AEDs compared to a third in the English cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Structured description of the characteristics, differences, and commonalities of PwID, treatment, and services of both countries is presented. This is the first real-world study to reveal unique characteristics of managing epilepsy for a complex ID population. In particular, it highlights the considerable comorbid psychiatric burden and psychotropic prescribing.

Under representation of people with epilepsy and intellectual disability in research.

PURPOSE: One quarter of people with epilepsy have an intellectual disability (ID) and one fifth of people with an ID have epilepsy. Both conditions are associated with higher levels of morbidity, stigma and premature mortality. There have been calls for action to promote more research in this group. We examined if this group are represented adequately in current research. METHODS: The proportion of research output in epilepsy conferences and publications relevant to ID and the proportion in ID conferences and publications on epilepsy for 2015-2016 were identified. As the percentage of children in the population with epilepsy is 17%, research output of this group was compared with the ID group. Recognised material was classified based on whether it applied to general epilepsy/ID research, children with epilepsy or people with epilepsy and ID. Data was analysed to determine the proportion of presented research specifically identifying people with epilepsy and ID. RESULTS: Fewer than 2% of presentations at epilepsy conferences specifically related to the ID and epilepsy group compared to 15% relating to children with epilepsy. Similarly only 1.4% of the research presented at major ID conferences related to those with people with epilepsy and ID. About 5% of published research in the field of epilepsy related to those with ID as compared with 24% for children with epilepsy. Twelve percent of published research in ID specifically identified epilepsy. CONCLUSION: Publications and conference presentations, on the population with epilepsy and comorbid ID is under-represented. Increased research in this area might assist in improving the quality of care for this relatively neglected group.